From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Cc: Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:28:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ae4dbd-b1b8-c640-0dc0-d8c2bbe666e2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122190752.3081016-1-perex@perex.cz>
On 1/22/20 1:07 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> The code which checks the return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link() call
> in soc_tplg_fe_link_create() moved the snd_soc_add_dai_link() call before
> link->dobj members initialization.
>
> While it does not affect the latest kernels, the old soc-core.c code
> in the stable kernels is affected. The snd_soc_add_dai_link() function uses
> the link->dobj.type member to check, if the link structure is valid.
>
> Reorder the link->dobj initialization to make things work again.
> It's harmless for the recent code (and the structure should be properly
> initialized before other calls anyway).
>
> The problem is in stable linux-5.4.y since version 5.4.11 when the
> upstream commit 76d270364932 was applied.
I am not following. Is this a fix for linux-5.4-y only, or is it needed
on Mark's tree? In the latter case, what is broken? We've been using
Mark's tree without issues, wondering what we missed?
>
> Fixes: 76d270364932 ("ASoC: topology: Check return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link()")
> Cc: Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com>
> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
> ---
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> index 92e4f4d08bfa..4e1fe623c390 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> @@ -1906,6 +1906,10 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
> link->num_codecs = 1;
> link->num_platforms = 1;
>
> + link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
> + link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
> + link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK;
> +
> if (strlen(pcm->pcm_name)) {
> link->name = kstrdup(pcm->pcm_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> link->stream_name = kstrdup(pcm->pcm_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1942,9 +1946,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
> - link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
> - link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK;
> list_add(&link->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
>
> return 0;
>
_______________________________________________
Alsa-devel mailing list
Alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
https://mailman.alsa-project.org/mailman/listinfo/alsa-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
ALSA development <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>
Cc: Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 13:28:57 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <26ae4dbd-b1b8-c640-0dc0-d8c2bbe666e2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122190752.3081016-1-perex@perex.cz>
On 1/22/20 1:07 PM, Jaroslav Kysela wrote:
> The code which checks the return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link() call
> in soc_tplg_fe_link_create() moved the snd_soc_add_dai_link() call before
> link->dobj members initialization.
>
> While it does not affect the latest kernels, the old soc-core.c code
> in the stable kernels is affected. The snd_soc_add_dai_link() function uses
> the link->dobj.type member to check, if the link structure is valid.
>
> Reorder the link->dobj initialization to make things work again.
> It's harmless for the recent code (and the structure should be properly
> initialized before other calls anyway).
>
> The problem is in stable linux-5.4.y since version 5.4.11 when the
> upstream commit 76d270364932 was applied.
I am not following. Is this a fix for linux-5.4-y only, or is it needed
on Mark's tree? In the latter case, what is broken? We've been using
Mark's tree without issues, wondering what we missed?
>
> Fixes: 76d270364932 ("ASoC: topology: Check return value for snd_soc_add_dai_link()")
> Cc: Dragos Tarcatu <dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com>
> Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
> ---
> sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> index 92e4f4d08bfa..4e1fe623c390 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
> @@ -1906,6 +1906,10 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
> link->num_codecs = 1;
> link->num_platforms = 1;
>
> + link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
> + link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
> + link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK;
> +
> if (strlen(pcm->pcm_name)) {
> link->name = kstrdup(pcm->pcm_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> link->stream_name = kstrdup(pcm->pcm_name, GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1942,9 +1946,6 @@ static int soc_tplg_fe_link_create(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
> goto err;
> }
>
> - link->dobj.index = tplg->index;
> - link->dobj.ops = tplg->ops;
> - link->dobj.type = SND_SOC_DOBJ_DAI_LINK;
> list_add(&link->dobj.list, &tplg->comp->dobj_list);
>
> return 0;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-22 19:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-22 19:07 [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 19:07 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 19:28 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2020-01-22 19:28 ` [alsa-devel] " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-01-22 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2020-01-22 20:25 ` Mark Brown
2020-01-22 20:49 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 20:49 ` Jaroslav Kysela
2020-01-22 21:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-01-22 21:47 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-01-23 6:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-23 6:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-01-23 12:36 ` [alsa-devel] Applied "ASoC: topology: fix soc_tplg_fe_link_create() - link->dobj initialization order" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2020-01-23 12:36 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=26ae4dbd-b1b8-c640-0dc0-d8c2bbe666e2@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=dragos_tarcatu@mentor.com \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.