All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX offload for rockchip devices
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 20:31:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2839092.mkRqKCgQVQ@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401181840.31255-1-papadakospan@gmail.com>

Hi Leonidas,

Am Montag, 1. April 2019, 20:18:40 CEST schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos:
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Kamil=20Trzci=C5=84ski?= <ayufan@ayufan.eu>
> 
> Some rockchip boards exhibit an issue where tx checksumming does not work with
> packets larger than 1498.
> 
> This is bad for network stability.
> 
> The previous approach was using force_thresh_dma_mode in the board dts, which
> does more than we need.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonidas P. Papadakos <papadakospan@gmail.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 3031f2bf1..807cf5826 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,8 @@ stmmac_probe_config_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, const char **mac)
>  		pr_warn("force_sf_dma_mode is ignored if force_thresh_dma_mode is set.");
>  	}
>  
> +	plat->bugged_tx_coe = of_property_read_bool(np, "rockchip,bugged_tx_coe");
> +

you're adding a new devicetree property, so please
(1) also update the binding doc in
    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.txt
(2) Cc devicetree maintainers and lists (via get_maintainer.pl once
    you've added the binding change) to let them look at it.


Thanks
Heiko

>  	of_property_read_u32(np, "snps,ps-speed", &plat->mac_port_sel_speed);
>  
>  	plat->axi = stmmac_axi_setup(pdev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> index 4335bd771..60c411f43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data {
>  	int pmt;
>  	int force_sf_dma_mode;
>  	int force_thresh_dma_mode;
> +	int bugged_tx_coe;
>  	int riwt_off;
>  	int max_speed;
>  	int maxmtu;
> 





_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: "Leonidas P. Papadakos" <papadakospan@gmail.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX offload for rockchip devices
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 20:31:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2839092.mkRqKCgQVQ@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190401181840.31255-1-papadakospan@gmail.com>

Hi Leonidas,

Am Montag, 1. April 2019, 20:18:40 CEST schrieb Leonidas P. Papadakos:
> From: =?UTF-8?q?Kamil=20Trzci=C5=84ski?= <ayufan@ayufan.eu>
> 
> Some rockchip boards exhibit an issue where tx checksumming does not work with
> packets larger than 1498.
> 
> This is bad for network stability.
> 
> The previous approach was using force_thresh_dma_mode in the board dts, which
> does more than we need.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonidas P. Papadakos <papadakospan@gmail.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> index 3031f2bf1..807cf5826 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_platform.c
> @@ -519,6 +519,8 @@ stmmac_probe_config_dt(struct platform_device *pdev, const char **mac)
>  		pr_warn("force_sf_dma_mode is ignored if force_thresh_dma_mode is set.");
>  	}
>  
> +	plat->bugged_tx_coe = of_property_read_bool(np, "rockchip,bugged_tx_coe");
> +

you're adding a new devicetree property, so please
(1) also update the binding doc in
    Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.txt
(2) Cc devicetree maintainers and lists (via get_maintainer.pl once
    you've added the binding change) to let them look at it.


Thanks
Heiko

>  	of_property_read_u32(np, "snps,ps-speed", &plat->mac_port_sel_speed);
>  
>  	plat->axi = stmmac_axi_setup(pdev);
> diff --git a/include/linux/stmmac.h b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> index 4335bd771..60c411f43 100644
> --- a/include/linux/stmmac.h
> +++ b/include/linux/stmmac.h
> @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ struct plat_stmmacenet_data {
>  	int pmt;
>  	int force_sf_dma_mode;
>  	int force_thresh_dma_mode;
> +	int bugged_tx_coe;
>  	int riwt_off;
>  	int max_speed;
>  	int maxmtu;
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-01 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-01 18:18 [PATCH 1/2] stmmac: introduce flag to dynamically disable TX offload for rockchip devices Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-01 18:18 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-01 18:31 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2019-04-01 18:31   ` Heiko Stübner
2019-04-01 18:54 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-01 18:54   ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-01 19:06   ` Heiko Stübner
2019-04-01 19:06     ` Heiko Stübner
2019-04-01 19:12     ` Philipp Tomsich
2019-04-01 19:12       ` Philipp Tomsich
2019-04-02  7:59       ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-02  7:59         ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-02 11:49         ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-02 11:49           ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-02 11:53           ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-02 11:53             ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-02 22:08             ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-02 22:08               ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-02 22:48               ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-02 22:48                 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-03  7:55                 ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-03  7:55                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-03 15:35                   ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-03 15:35                     ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-03 15:55                     ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-03 15:55                       ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-03 16:12                       ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-03 16:12                         ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-05 10:24                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-05 10:24                           ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-05 17:58                           ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-05 17:58                             ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-05 18:14                           ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-05 18:14                             ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-05 18:29                             ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-05 18:29                               ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-05 18:38                               ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-05 18:38                                 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-11 21:09                                 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-11 21:09                                   ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-12  7:35                                   ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-12  7:35                                     ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-12 11:13                                     ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-12 11:13                                       ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-15  8:15                                       ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-15  8:15                                         ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-15 21:45                                         ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-15 21:45                                           ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-15 22:19                                           ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-15 22:19                                             ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-16  8:01                                             ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-16  8:01                                               ` Jose Abreu
2019-04-16 10:03                                               ` Leonidas P. Papadakos
2019-04-16 10:03                                                 ` Leonidas P. Papadakos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2839092.mkRqKCgQVQ@diego \
    --to=heiko@sntech.de \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=papadakospan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.