[Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Marc Collin]

hi

i do:
modprobe kqemu

with  /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
kqemu                  43272  0

does kqemu run corretely?
l'm not suppose to get 2?

thanks
-- 
www.laboiteaprog.com

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[André Braga]

Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.

2005/5/8, Marc Collin <collinm@laboiteaprog.com>:
> hi
> 
> i do:
> modprobe kqemu
> 
> with  /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
> kqemu                  43272  0
> 
> does kqemu run corretely?
> l'm not suppose to get 2?
> 
> thanks
>

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Marc Collin]

Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
>

0 means kqemu is ok?

-- 
www.laboiteaprog.com

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Thibaut LAURENT]

On Sunday 08 May 2005 21:36, Marc Collin wrote:
> hi
>
> i do:
> modprobe kqemu
>
> with  /sbin/lsmod | grep kqemu
> kqemu                  43272  0
>
> does kqemu run corretely?
> l'm not suppose to get 2?

Yes you are if :
 * one instance of qemu is running 
 * this instance was started after kqemu was loaded
 * /dev/kqemu is there and has correct permissions for the account you're 
currently logged in (it might have disappeared because of udev...)

0 means the module is not currently used (no /dev/kqemu ?)

To be on the safe side with kqemu, you can add the following line to 
your /etc/modprobe.conf (or whatever similar file for your distro) :
alias char-major-250 kqemu
The device file itself can be created in a very simple initscript...

BTW, qemu complains if it was compiled with kqemu support and can't use it for 
some reason ("Could not open '/dev/kqemu' - QEMU acceleration layer not 
activated").

Cheers,
Thibaut

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Struan Bartlett]

Marc Collin wrote:

>Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
>  
>
>>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
>>    
>>
>0 means kqemu is ok?
>  
>
I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of 
QEMU, lsmod lists:

kqemu                  43428  2

When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:

kqemu                  43428  0

Struan

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Joe Menola]

On Sun May 8 2005 5:40 pm, Struan Bartlett wrote:
> When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu                  43428  0

The zero represents the number of processes currently using the module. You 
will also get zero if no instance of Qemu is currently running.

-jm

Re: [Qemu-devel] Kqemu charged?

[Marc Collin]

Le 8 Mai 2005 18:40, Struan Bartlett a écrit :
> Marc Collin wrote:
> >Le 8 Mai 2005 17:00, André Braga a écrit :
> >>Unless you have 2 instances of QEMU running, no, you're not supposed to.
> >
> >0 means kqemu is ok?
>
> I don't think so. The way I see it, when I'm running _one_ instance of
> QEMU, lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu                  43428  2
>
> When I run QEMU with the '-no-kqemu' option lsmod lists:
>
> kqemu                  43428  0
>
> Struan
>
>
>

i use suse 9.3 with kernel: 2.6.11.4 maybe kqemu don't support it?

-- 
www.laboiteaprog.com