From: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
To: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>,
Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests: riscv: Add braces around EXPECT_EQ()
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 11:46:53 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34fbc75a-ae74-8337-3107-80957707bc8f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d79b23d2-f8e8-b92e-cad4-5cbdf7690f12@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2026, Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > From: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
> >
> > EXPECT_EQ() expands to multiple lines, breaking up one-line if
> > statements. This issue was not present in the patch on the mailing list
> > but was instead introduced by the maintainer when attempting to fix up
> > checkpatch warnings. Add braces around EXPECT_EQ() to avoid the error
> > even though checkpatch suggests them to be removed:
> >
> > validate_v_ptrace.c:626:17: error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’
>
> That's annoying. Can't the macro body be wrapped in do { ... } while (0);
> instead, rather than adding these permanent checkpatch warnings?
I guess you haven't had the chance to take a look at this. Or maybe you
took a look at the kselftest harness macro mess and just decided not to
say anything ;-) I did look, after not hearing back, and the way those
macros are used would make it a big and painful lift to straighten out -
definitely not something for the -rc time frame.
So in the short term, I'm planning to take this as a fix to deal with the
immediate issue.
checkpatch.pl clearly needs to be patched to assume that these kselftest
harness macros don't follow the rules. Care to take that on?
- Paul
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>
To: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Sergey Matyukevich <geomatsi@gmail.com>,
Andy Chiu <andybnac@gmail.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests: riscv: Add braces around EXPECT_EQ()
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2026 11:46:53 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <34fbc75a-ae74-8337-3107-80957707bc8f@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d79b23d2-f8e8-b92e-cad4-5cbdf7690f12@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1326 bytes --]
On Fri, 20 Mar 2026, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Mar 2026, Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay wrote:
>
> > From: Charlie Jenkins <thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com>
> >
> > EXPECT_EQ() expands to multiple lines, breaking up one-line if
> > statements. This issue was not present in the patch on the mailing list
> > but was instead introduced by the maintainer when attempting to fix up
> > checkpatch warnings. Add braces around EXPECT_EQ() to avoid the error
> > even though checkpatch suggests them to be removed:
> >
> > validate_v_ptrace.c:626:17: error: ‘else’ without a previous ‘if’
>
> That's annoying. Can't the macro body be wrapped in do { ... } while (0);
> instead, rather than adding these permanent checkpatch warnings?
I guess you haven't had the chance to take a look at this. Or maybe you
took a look at the kselftest harness macro mess and just decided not to
say anything ;-) I did look, after not hearing back, and the way those
macros are used would make it a big and painful lift to straighten out -
definitely not something for the -rc time frame.
So in the short term, I'm planning to take this as a fix to deal with the
immediate issue.
checkpatch.pl clearly needs to be patched to assume that these kselftest
harness macros don't follow the rules. Care to take that on?
- Paul
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 161 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-10 1:52 [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: riscv: Fix compilation issues for v_ptrace and cfi Charlie Jenkins
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] selftests: riscv: Add definition of BIT() macro Charlie Jenkins
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 8:18 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2026-03-10 8:18 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2026-03-21 0:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:48 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-10 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] selftests: riscv: Add braces around EXPECT_EQ() Charlie Jenkins
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 3:50 ` Joe Perches
2026-03-10 3:50 ` Joe Perches
2026-03-10 8:17 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2026-03-10 8:17 ` Sergey Matyukevich
2026-03-21 0:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:24 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-04-03 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
2026-04-03 17:46 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-10 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] riscv: ptrace: Fix BIT() compilation issues Charlie Jenkins
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 2:58 ` Deepak Gupta
2026-03-10 2:58 ` Deepak Gupta
2026-03-21 0:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:53 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-10 1:52 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] selftests: riscv: Add license to cfi selftest Charlie Jenkins
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 1:52 ` Charlie Jenkins via B4 Relay
2026-03-10 2:58 ` Deepak Gupta
2026-03-10 2:58 ` Deepak Gupta
2026-03-21 0:54 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 0:54 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-21 5:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] selftests: riscv: Fix compilation issues for v_ptrace and cfi patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2026-03-21 5:20 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2026-04-03 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2026-04-03 18:30 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=34fbc75a-ae74-8337-3107-80957707bc8f@kernel.org \
--to=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=andybnac@gmail.com \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=geomatsi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=thecharlesjenkins@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.