From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Subject: re: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 19:20:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA80108.C830D602@kegel.com> (raw)
Davide wrote:
> The /dev/epoll patch has been updated :
>
> *) Stale events removal
> *) Help in Configure.help ( thanks to David E. Weekly )
> *) Fit 2.4.9
> ...
> http://www.xmailserver.org/linux-patches/nio-improve.html
Davide,
I'm getting ready to stress-test /dev/epoll finally.
In porting my Poller_devpoll.{cc,h} to support /dev/epoll, I noticed
the following issues:
1. it would be very nice to be able to expand the interest list
without affecting the currently ready list. In fact, this may
be needed to support existing programs. A quick look at
your code gives me the impression that it would be easy to add
a ioctl(kdpfd, EP_REALLOC, newmaxfds) call to do this. Do you agree?
2. The names made visible to userland by your patch do not follow
a consistent naming convention. May I suggest that you use
EPOLL_ as a uniform prefix, and epoll.h as the user-visible include file?
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007908799/xsh/compilation.html
shows that Posix cares greatly about this kind of namespace issue,
and it'd be nice to follow their lead, even though this isn't a Posix
interface.
3. You modify asm/poll.h. Can your modifications be restricted to epoll.h
instead? (Hey, I don't know much, maybe there's a good reason you did this.)
Thanks,
Dan Kegel
next reply other threads:[~2001-09-19 2:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-19 2:20 Dan Kegel [this message]
2001-09-19 6:25 ` [PATCH] /dev/epoll update Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 7:04 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 15:37 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 15:59 ` Zach Brown
2001-09-19 17:12 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 17:39 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 18:26 ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 17:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 19:03 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 19:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 21:49 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 22:11 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 23:24 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 23:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 2:13 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-20 2:28 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 3:03 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-20 16:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 4:32 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20 4:43 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20 5:05 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 18:25 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 19:33 ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 19:58 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 17:18 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 0:11 ` Gordon Oliver
2001-09-24 0:33 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 19:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 20:04 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-21 5:59 ` Ton Hospel
2001-09-21 16:48 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 17:21 ` Davide Libenzi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-20 3:49 [patch] " Davide Libenzi
[not found] <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BB03C6A.7D1DD7B3@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAEB39B.DE7932CF@kegel.com>
[not found] ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25 17:36 ` [PATCH] " Jonathan Lemon
2001-09-25 18:34 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-24 4:16 Dan Kegel
2001-09-24 19:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 19:34 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 20:09 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 21:56 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:08 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:09 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:20 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:21 ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:30 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-25 9:25 ` Dan Kegel
[not found] ` <3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25 8:12 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-21 6:22 Dan Kegel
2001-09-21 18:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-07 19:27 Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3BA80108.C830D602@kegel.com \
--to=dank@kegel.com \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.