All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: "Christopher K. St. John" <cks@distributopia.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/epoll update ...
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 19:13:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3BA950AF.58CFCF29@kegel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20010919151147.davidel@xmailserver.org>

Davide Libenzi wrote:
> 1)      if (recv()/send() == FAIL)
> 2)              ioctl(EP_POLL);

A lot of people, including me, were under the mistaken impression
that /dev/epoll, like /dev/poll, provided an efficient way to
retrieve the current readiness state of fd's.  I understand from your post
that /dev/epoll's purpose is to retrieve state changes; in other
words, it's exactly like F_SETSIG/F_SETOWN/O_ASYNC except that
the readiness change indications are picked up via an ioctl
rather than via a signal.

A scorecard for the confused (Davide, correct me if I'm wrong):

* API's that allow you to retrieve the current readiness state of
  a set of fd's:  poll(), select(), /dev/poll, kqueue().
  Buzzwords describing this kind of interface: level-triggered, multishot.

* API's that allow you to retrieve *changes* to the readiness state of
  a set of fd's: F_SETSIG/F_SETOWN/O_ASYNC + sigtimedwait(), /dev/epoll, kqueue().
  Buzzwords describing this kind of interface: edge-triggered, single-shot.

(Note that kqueue is in both camps.)

Er, I guess that means I'll rip up the /dev/epoll support I based on my
/dev/poll code, and replace it with some based on my O_ASYNC code...

- Dan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-09-20  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-09-19  2:20 [PATCH] /dev/epoll update Dan Kegel
2001-09-19  6:25 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-19  7:04 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 15:37   ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-19 15:59     ` Zach Brown
2001-09-19 17:12     ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 17:39     ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 18:26     ` Alan Cox
2001-09-19 17:25   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 19:03     ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 19:30       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 21:49         ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 22:11           ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 23:24             ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-19 23:52               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20  2:13             ` Dan Kegel [this message]
2001-09-20  2:28               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20  3:03                 ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-20 16:58                   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20  4:32                 ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20  4:43                   ` Christopher K. St. John
2001-09-20  5:05                     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 18:25                       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 19:33                         ` Benjamin LaHaise
2001-09-20 19:58                           ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-20 17:18                   ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24  0:11                     ` Gordon Oliver
2001-09-24  0:33                       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 19:23                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 20:04                       ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-21  5:59             ` Ton Hospel
2001-09-21 16:48               ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-19 17:21 ` Davide Libenzi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-03-20  3:49 [patch] " Davide Libenzi
     [not found] <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BB03C6A.7D1DD7B3@kegel.com>
     [not found] ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAEB39B.DE7932CF@kegel.com>
     [not found]   ` <local.mail.linux-kernel/3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25 17:36     ` [PATCH] " Jonathan Lemon
2001-09-25 18:34       ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-24  4:16 Dan Kegel
2001-09-24 19:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-09-24 19:34   ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 20:09     ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 21:56       ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:08         ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:09           ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:20             ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-24 22:21               ` Jamie Lokier
2001-09-24 22:30                 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-25  9:25             ` Dan Kegel
     [not found] ` <3BAF83EF.C8018E45@distributopia.com>
2001-09-25  8:12   ` Dan Kegel
2001-09-21  6:22 Dan Kegel
2001-09-21 18:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-09-07 19:27 Davide Libenzi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3BA950AF.58CFCF29@kegel.com \
    --to=dank@kegel.com \
    --cc=cks@distributopia.com \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.