From: "John W. Linville" <linville@lvl7.com>
To: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:05:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D0DEC91.367D9BDB@lvl7.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3D0DA9C2.D78C43E5@imc-berlin.de
Steven Scholz wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I think we should move the board specific defines such as
>
> /*** RPXCLASSIC *****************************************************/
I, for one, think that's a great idea. It is always a PITA to track
down those nits when doing support for a new board or moving board
support from one kernel to the next...
John
--
John W. Linville
LVL7 Systems, Inc.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 14:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D0DEC91.367D9BDB@lvl7.com \
--to=linville@lvl7.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.