From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>,
LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 12:32:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D1203B2.6050409@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020619212246.GA16052@opus.bloom.county
Tom Rini wrote:
> And in the (un)fortunate grand linux tradition, new features with some
> demand from the users behind them get backported too. For example,
> 2.2.current (21? 22?) has all sorts of compat glue for 2.4 drivers and a
> rather current USB stack and all sorts of things like that..
It was probably done in 2.3.xx and backported, but yes, that does happen
and it is a good thing. However, it was first done in the newer, development
tree before it was ported into the current, stable kernel. I think
the first half dozen 2.4 releases were really 2.3.xxx, anyway :-)
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-20 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek [this message]
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D1203B2.6050409@embeddededge.com \
--to=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.