From: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:18:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D10A0AC.409EF92B@imc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20020619150520.GA12762@opus.bloom.county
Tom Rini wrote:
> I'm sort-of supprised it works.
I told you, it's not that much to do...
:-)
> Isn't:
> ((uint)0x....)
> in assembly bad?
Hmm. Don't know. Maybe. But these are just DEFINES! So what should that
be bad?
> I think we need to have all of these defines enclosed with the
> __ASSEMBLY__ test, but I can go fix that.
At least spd8xx.h and tqm8xx.h don't have any #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ at
all!?
Cheers,
Steven
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-19 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz [this message]
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D10A0AC.409EF92B@imc-berlin.de \
--to=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.