From: John Traill <john.traill@motorola.com>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Steven Scholz <steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de>,
Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>, Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>,
Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
LinuxPPC <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: board specific defines in commproc.h !?!?
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 15:18:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3D13359C.2030803@motorola.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com
Everyone/Anyone,
Does this mean linuxppc_2_4_devel will disappear leaving a 2.4 stable tree and a 2.5 devel ?
Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Steven Scholz writes:
>
>
>>I am not quite sure about the policies now. Could you please explain:
>>
>>linuxppc_2_4 is a stable tree
>>linuxppc_2_4_devel is a devel tree
>>linuxppc_2_5 is a devel tree
>>
>>Is that right?
>
>
> 2_4_devel is stabilizing. Once 2.4.19 comes out the plan is to
> restructure the linuxppc_2_4 tree along the lines of the 2_4_devel
> tree and start moving the stuff from 2_4_devel into 2_4 and submit it
> to Marcelo.
>
> With 2.5, I am hoping to be able to keep Linus' tree in closer sync
> with our linuxppc-2.5 tree than we managed in the past with the 2_4
> trees.
>
> Paul.
>
--
Regards, John
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-21 14:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-17 9:20 board specific defines in commproc.h !?!? Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 14:05 ` John W. Linville
2002-06-17 15:32 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 15:37 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 15:49 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 16:01 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 16:28 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-17 17:25 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <20020617173550.GV13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 17:46 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-17 20:23 ` Wolfgang Denk
[not found] ` <3D106922.7026437A@imc-berlin.de>
2002-06-19 15:05 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:18 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:25 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:33 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 15:47 ` Steven Scholz
2002-06-19 15:51 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-19 21:11 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 21:22 ` Tom Rini
2002-06-20 16:32 ` Dan Malek
2002-06-19 22:15 ` Wolfgang Denk
2002-06-19 23:26 ` Conn Clark
2002-06-20 16:40 ` Dan Malek
[not found] ` <3D12F140.23BA447F@imc-berlin.de>
[not found] ` <15635.12386.415897.593660@argo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
2002-06-21 14:18 ` John Traill [this message]
[not found] <20020617214339.GZ13541@opus.bloom.county>
2002-06-17 22:28 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3D13359C.2030803@motorola.com \
--to=john.traill@motorola.com \
--cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=steven.scholz@imc-berlin.de \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.