* transparent internet via radio
@ 2003-08-24 23:56 A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: A Gilmore @ 2003-08-24 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
away from central computer lab) is possible. Neither dial-up or
broadband is accessible in these locations.
So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
put a TNC equipped linux gateway at each remote location, to tunnel
TCP/IP over AX.25 to the central LAN with broadband, and route the
TCP/IP from there.
Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
interfacing the protocols?
Sorry if these questions are vague or overly simple, Id just like to
know if this is possible before I spend the next several days
researching it. Most of the information I have found so far, has been
out-dated, and mostly focused on using TCP/IP to carry AX.25, rather
then the vice-versa.
Adrien
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
@ 2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Bates @ 2003-08-25 0:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: A Gilmore; +Cc: linux-hams
Adrien,
You should investigate using wireless ethernet (802.11b). Several of
the 802.11b channels are in the Amateur spectrum. Also, the equipment
is widely available and quite afordable. By utilizing yagi or parabolic
antennas and good transcievers, you should be able to achieve a 15 mile
distance while maintaining at least 1mbps or better.
Of course, one of the drawbacks is that 802.11b requires nearly a
line-of-site path as 2ghz signals are easily reflected or absorbed by
obstructions.
Hope this helps!
Andrew/KB0LND
A Gilmore wrote:
>Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
>into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
>providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
>away from central computer lab) is possible. Neither dial-up or
>broadband is accessible in these locations.
>
>So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
>internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
>put a TNC equipped linux gateway at each remote location, to tunnel
>TCP/IP over AX.25 to the central LAN with broadband, and route the
>TCP/IP from there.
>
>Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
>Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
>transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
>interfacing the protocols?
>
>Sorry if these questions are vague or overly simple, Id just like to
>know if this is possible before I spend the next several days
>researching it. Most of the information I have found so far, has been
>out-dated, and mostly focused on using TCP/IP to carry AX.25, rather
>then the vice-versa.
>Adrien
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
@ 2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-08-26 14:18 ` John Feist
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bob Nielsen @ 2003-08-25 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
See the AX25-HOWTO for information on tcp/ip over AX.25.
The WA4DSY modem will do 56 kbps (http://www.paccomm.com). It operates
at 29 MHz and must be used with a transverter for the appropriate band.
Some hams in Slovenia have designed high speed equipment, see
http://hamradio.si/hid.html for some links.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700, A Gilmore wrote:
> Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
> away from central computer lab) is possible. Neither dial-up or
> broadband is accessible in these locations.
>
> So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
> internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
> put a TNC equipped linux gateway at each remote location, to tunnel
> TCP/IP over AX.25 to the central LAN with broadband, and route the
> TCP/IP from there.
>
> Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> interfacing the protocols?
>
> Sorry if these questions are vague or overly simple, Id just like to
> know if this is possible before I spend the next several days
> researching it. Most of the information I have found so far, has been
> out-dated, and mostly focused on using TCP/IP to carry AX.25, rather
> then the vice-versa.
> Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.net
Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.n7xy.net
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* RE: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
@ 2003-08-26 14:18 ` John Feist
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: John Feist @ 2003-08-26 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
Yup, we have 56k here in San Diego on 70cm, been up for several years 25
miles point-to-point. Some folks up North are using 802.11b 6-7 miles at 6~7
Mbit.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Bob Nielsen
Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 7:59 PM
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: transparent internet via radio
See the AX25-HOWTO for information on tcp/ip over AX.25.
The WA4DSY modem will do 56 kbps (http://www.paccomm.com). It operates
at 29 MHz and must be used with a transverter for the appropriate band.
Some hams in Slovenia have designed high speed equipment, see
http://hamradio.si/hid.html for some links.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700, A Gilmore wrote:
> Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
> away from central computer lab) is possible. Neither dial-up or
> broadband is accessible in these locations.
>
> So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
> internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
> put a TNC equipped linux gateway at each remote location, to tunnel
> TCP/IP over AX.25 to the central LAN with broadband, and route the
> TCP/IP from there.
>
> Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> interfacing the protocols?
>
> Sorry if these questions are vague or overly simple, Id just like to
> know if this is possible before I spend the next several days
> researching it. Most of the information I have found so far, has been
> out-dated, and mostly focused on using TCP/IP to carry AX.25, rather
> then the vice-versa.
> Adrien
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Bob Nielsen, N7XY n7xy (at) n7xy.net
Bainbridge Island, WA http://www.n7xy.net
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
@ 2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor
2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: M Taylor @ 2003-08-25 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: A Gilmore; +Cc: linux-hams
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 04:56:49PM -0700, A Gilmore wrote:
> Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
>
> So I started looking into radio. I will have one LAN with broadband
> internet, and remote LANs without any internet access. The idea is to
>
> Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> interfacing the protocols?
Are you a licensed amateur radio (ham) operator? You don't mention
a callsign, and some of your questions seem quite basic regarding
VHF & higher propagation, which suggests perhaps you are not.
Amateur radio in Canada and elsewhere has content restrictions and
is for non-commercial usage, which are not agreeable to most people's
general Internet usage. So for general wireless Internet access,
I suspect that the amateur radio solution is not the best general
solution.
I would suggest looking into license-free/exempt "WiFi" or 802.11(b)
wireless ethernet. These are low cost (cheaper than a commercial TNC
in most cases) devices provide low power (often 100mW) 2.4 GHz
(microwave) with speeds up to 11Mbps (802.11b) or higher (802.11g).
With a clear line of sight, and a small directional antenna
you can easily get a stable connection over 10km or more.
I would not recommend consumer oriented 802.11b for a Wireless ISP
(WISP) as they tend to have serious issues scaling, and the
license-free status means you must tolerate intereference.
See BC Wireless for more Canadian specific information:
<http://www.bcwireless.net/>
-ve1mct
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor
@ 2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Boone @ 2003-08-25 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
> > Having always had high-speed internet available, I have never looked
> > into radio technology before. However, I have been asked recently if
> > providing internet to a number of locations (varying between 10-50km
> > Is this feasible? Can speed be in the 28kbps or better range?
> > Generally how much would the radio equipment cost? Is providing
> > transparent internet by these means difficult, regarding routing and
> > interfacing the protocols?
> Amateur radio in Canada and elsewhere has content restrictions and is
> for non-commercial usage, which are not agreeable to most people's
> general Internet usage. So for general wireless Internet access, I
> suspect that the amateur radio solution is not the best general
> solution.
However it is certainly feasible to use similar or identical gear on a
licensed commercial frequency. Kantronics and other amateur packet
manufacturers make most of their money selling to commercial
entities.
Since the gear is sold for these purposes, presumably it is possible
to get a business band license for point-to-point data circuits. I
should think it would be relatively simple to get 56k data rates over
circuits of the length described, assuming terrain cooperates, on
VHF-low or -high frequencies. In the U.S., for example, there have
been packet networks spanning a number of southeastern states,
e.g. SEDAN. Needed equipment would be a mast or tower at each
location, beam antennas at most locations (perhaps a vertical at the
central point), data radios, modems capable of the desired speed,
license, and a fair amount of knowledge to integrate it all.
> I would suggest looking into license-free/exempt "WiFi" or 802.11(b)
> wireless ethernet. These are low cost (cheaper than a commercial TNC
> in most cases) devices provide low power (often 100mW) 2.4 GHz
> (microwave) with speeds up to 11Mbps (802.11b) or higher (802.11g).
> With a clear line of sight, and a small directional antenna you can
> easily get a stable connection over 10km or more.
But he specified up to 50 km, which is probably NOT feasible with
802.x technology, at least without relay stations.
Dennis Boone
KB8ZQZ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
@ 2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jeroen Vreeken @ 2003-08-25 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
On 2003.08.25 16:41:30 +0200 Dennis Boone wrote:
>
> But he specified up to 50 km, which is probably NOT feasible with
> 802.x technology, at least without relay stations.
>
I believe the record at the moment is 70km between Gran Canaria and
Tenerife....
So it is possible you just need very good antennas and some coordination
and luck to set it up.
As he wanted relativly low speeds the decrease in speed to 1mbit for 802.11
shouldn't be much of a problem.
Jeroen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
@ 2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
2003-08-25 20:31 ` Dennis Boone
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jaime Robles @ 2003-08-25 19:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
El Lunes, 25 de Agosto de 2003 20:35, Jeroen Vreeken escribió:
> On 2003.08.25 16:41:30 +0200 Dennis Boone wrote:
> > But he specified up to 50 km, which is probably NOT feasible with
> > 802.x technology, at least without relay stations.
> I believe the record at the moment is 70km between Gran Canaria and
> Tenerife....
Yes, people from canariaswireless and ACRI ftp'ed between Gran Canaria &
Tenerife last year.
It was a link done just for the record and it is not a stable link but it is
possible :-)
http://www.canariaswireless.net/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=143&mode=&order=0&thold=0
- --
Un saludo,
Jaime Robles, EA4TV
jaime@robles.nu
Visita:
http://jaime.robles.nu
http://www.redlibre.net - La Red Libre de todos!
http://smsdx.net - El DXCluster en tu movil!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/SmmGER46oL+8yYURAoSZAJ94ZCnb+l7UJnODqEe/s3fsbgR3lQCfatfk
iccEjvPJcPkA0BOwHYM89IA=
=66sw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* Re: transparent internet via radio
2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
@ 2003-08-25 20:31 ` Dennis Boone
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Dennis Boone @ 2003-08-25 20:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-hams
> El Lunes, 25 de Agosto de 2003 20:35, Jeroen Vreeken escribió:
> > On 2003.08.25 16:41:30 +0200 Dennis Boone wrote:
> > > But he specified up to 50 km, which is probably NOT feasible with
> > > 802.x technology, at least without relay stations.
> > I believe the record at the moment is 70km between Gran Canaria and
> > Tenerife....
> Yes, people from canariaswireless and ACRI ftp'ed between Gran Canaria
> & Tenerife last year. It was a link done just for the record and it
> is not a stable link but it is possible :-)
And I suspect over-water ducting played a part in that contact. Over
land it might well be hard to match, even as an experiment with
optimum conditions.
Dennis Boone
KB8ZQZ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hams" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-26 14:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-24 23:56 transparent internet via radio A Gilmore
2003-08-25 0:14 ` Andrew Bates
2003-08-25 2:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2003-08-26 14:18 ` John Feist
2003-08-25 14:06 ` M Taylor
2003-08-25 14:41 ` Dennis Boone
2003-08-25 18:35 ` Jeroen Vreeken
2003-08-25 19:54 ` Jaime Robles
2003-08-25 20:31 ` Dennis Boone
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.