From: Peter Williams <peterw@aurema.com>
To: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:15:38 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <403E53EA.2010001@aurema.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <403E1A11.5050704@techsource.com>
Timothy Miller wrote:
>
>
> Peter Williams wrote:
>
>> Timothy Miller wrote:
>> > <snip>
>>
>>> In fact, that may be the only "flaw" in your design. It sounds like
>>> your scheduler does an excellent job at fairness with very low
>>> overhead. The only problem with it is that it doesn't determine
>>> priority dynamically.
>>
>>
>>
>> This (i.e. automatic renicing of specified programs) is a good idea
>> but is not really a function that should be undertaken by the
>> scheduler itself. Two possible solutions spring to mind:
>>
>> 1. modify the do_execve() in fs/exec.c to renice tasks when they
>> execute specified binaries
>
>
> We don't want user-space programs to have control over priority.
They already do e.g. renice is such a program.
> This
> is DoS waiting to happen.
>
>> 2. have a user space daemon poll running tasks periodically and renice
>> them if they are running specified binaries
>
>
> This is much too specific. Again, if the USER has control over this
> list,
It would obviously be under root control.
> then it's potential DoS. And if the user adds a program which
> should qualify but which is not in the list, the program will not get
> its deserved boost.
>
> And a sysadmin is not going to want to update 200 lab computers just so
> one user can get their program to run properly.
>
>>
>> Both of these solutions have their advantages and disadvantages, are
>> (obviously) complicated than I've made them sound and would require a
>> great deal of care to be taken during their implementation. However,
>> I think that they are both doable. My personal preference would be
>> for the in kernel solution on the grounds of efficiency.
>
>
> They are doable, but they are not a general solution.
>
Peter
--
Dr Peter Williams, Chief Scientist peterw@aurema.com
Aurema Pty Limited Tel:+61 2 9698 2322
PO Box 305, Strawberry Hills NSW 2012, Australia Fax:+61 2 9699 9174
79 Myrtle Street, Chippendale NSW 2008, Australia http://www.aurema.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-26 20:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-25 14:35 [RFC][PATCH] O(1) Entitlement Based Scheduler John Lee
2004-02-25 17:09 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 22:12 ` John Lee
2004-02-26 0:31 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 2:04 ` John Lee
2004-02-26 2:18 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 2:42 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 4:10 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 4:19 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 19:23 ` Shailabh Nagar
2004-02-26 19:46 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 20:42 ` Shailabh Nagar
2004-02-26 16:10 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 19:47 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-26 22:51 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-27 10:06 ` Helge Hafting
2004-02-27 11:04 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 16:08 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-26 16:51 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 20:15 ` Peter Williams [this message]
2004-02-27 14:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-28 5:00 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-04 21:18 ` Robert White
2004-03-04 23:15 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 2:48 ` Nuno Silva
2004-02-26 4:25 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 15:57 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 19:28 ` Shailabh Nagar
2004-02-26 16:12 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-25 22:51 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-26 3:14 ` John Lee
2004-02-25 23:45 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-26 7:18 ` John Lee
[not found] <fa.f12rt3d.c0s9rt@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ishajoq.q5g90m@ifi.uio.no>
2004-02-25 23:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2004-02-26 8:15 ` Catalin BOIE
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-26 3:30 Albert Cahalan
2004-02-26 6:19 ` Peter Williams
2004-02-26 17:57 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-02-26 23:24 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-01 3:47 ` Peter Williams
[not found] <1tfy0-7ly-29@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1thzJ-A5-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tjrN-2m5-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tjLa-2Ab-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tlaf-3OY-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tljX-3Wf-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tznd-CP-35@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1tzQe-10s-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-02-26 20:14 ` Bill Davidsen
[not found] <1t8wp-qF-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1th6J-az-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <403E2929.2080705@tmr.com>
2004-02-27 3:44 ` Rik van Riel
2004-02-28 21:27 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-28 23:55 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-04 21:08 ` Timothy Miller
[not found] <fa.fi4j08o.17nchps@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ctat17m.8mqa3c@ifi.uio.no>
2004-02-29 11:58 ` Joachim B Haga
2004-02-29 20:39 ` Paul Jackson
2004-02-29 22:56 ` Peter Williams
[not found] <894006121@toto.iv>
2004-03-01 0:00 ` Peter Chubb
2004-03-02 1:25 ` Peter Williams
[not found] <fa.jgj0bdi.b3u6qk@ifi.uio.no>
2004-03-01 1:54 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-03-01 2:54 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-01 3:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2004-03-01 4:18 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-02 23:36 ` Peter Williams
[not found] <fa.ftul5bl.nlk3pr@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.cvc8vnj.ahebjd@ifi.uio.no>
2004-03-01 9:18 ` Joachim B Haga
2004-03-01 10:18 ` Paul Wagland
2004-03-01 19:11 ` Mike Fedyk
[not found] <fa.fi4j08o.17nchps@ifi.uio.no.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <fa.ctat17m.8mqa3c@ifi.uio.no.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <yydjishqw10p.fsf@galizur.uio.no.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <40426E1C.8010806@aurema.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2004-03-03 2:48 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-03 3:45 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-03 10:13 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-03 23:46 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-03 15:57 ` Andi Kleen
2004-03-04 0:41 ` Peter Williams
2004-03-05 3:55 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <1vuMd-5jx-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vuMd-5jx-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vuMd-5jx-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vuMd-5jx-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vuMd-5jx-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vvyx-6jy-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <1vBE2-48V-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
2004-03-03 21:38 ` Bill Davidsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=403E53EA.2010001@aurema.com \
--to=peterw@aurema.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miller@techsource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.