2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[Mikael Cluseau]

Hello,

Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?

Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[mjt]

On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
>
>Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?

Afaik no.

Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
Although it was an old snapshot.

The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...

There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)

-- 
mjt

Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[Hans Reiser]

Markus Törnqvist wrote:

>On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
>  
>
>>Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?
>>    
>>
>
>Afaik no.
>
>Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
>freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
>Although it was an old snapshot.
>
>The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
>that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
>
>There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
>
>  
>
After we send to -mm we will work on a mainline patch.

Unfortunately I have to tell you that we are doing contract work for a 
customer not related to reiser4 in order to pay the bills, and for that 
reason reiser4 will most likely not get debugged this week.

Hans

Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[Redeeman]

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 12:24 -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, Jul 05, 2004 at 02:17:20PM +0200, Mikael Cluseau wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>Is there a patch the *vanilla* Linux 2.6.7 kernel ?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Afaik no.
> >
> >Last time something like this was tried, it resulted in random
> >freezings, and there I was not the only one affected.
> >Although it was an old snapshot.
> >
> >The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
> >that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
> >
> >There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
> >
> >  
> >
> After we send to -mm we will work on a mainline patch.
patch applies perfect on vanilla... maybe like 1 EASY EASY failed hunk,
which easily can be fixed. and it works perfect.
> 
> Unfortunately I have to tell you that we are doing contract work for a 
> customer not related to reiser4 in order to pay the bills, and for that 
> reason reiser4 will most likely not get debugged this week.
> 
> Hans
> 
-- 
Redeeman <redeeman@metanurb.dk>

RE: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[Burnes, James]

Is namesys et al trying for 2.6.8 inclusion for Reiser4?

jim burnes
security engineer
great-west, denver
 

> 
> The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
> that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
> 
> There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
> 
> --
> mjt

Re: 2.6.7 reiser4 patch ?

[Vladimir V. Saveliev]

Hello

Burnes, James wrote:
> Is namesys et al trying for 2.6.8 inclusion for Reiser4?
> 

We are going to send it out for inclusion into mm serie of kernel

> jim burnes
> security engineer
> great-west, denver
>  
> 
> 
>>The -mm tree is used because -mm stuff goes into mainline and
>>that's what the Reiser4 people are trying to accomplish...
>>
>>There's nothing wrong with sticking to what Namesys gives :)
>>
>>--
>>mjt
> 
> 
> 
>