From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "John D. Heintz" <jheintz@pobox.com>
Cc: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>,
Claudio Martins <ctpm@ist.utl.pt>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Marcel Hilzinger <marcel@hilzinger.hu>
Subject: Re: reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not)
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 22:58:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FCB46A.2020102@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FC4619.8070206@pobox.com>
John D. Heintz wrote:
> Innovate then standardize.
Thanks John, I think you understand me.
Trying to innovate in a standards setting way is really hard unless your
competitors understand your ideas and support them and want to help you
create a new market. Ours don't.
David, I understand you mean well. You just don't understand what
motivates technology trailers. They have no desire at all to innovate.
Their only desire is to keep us from innovating because it makes more
work for them. This is not arrogance speaking, this is tired experience
speaking. They want to make nice little tweaks one step at a time,
working a bit every week between their speaking engagements, and none of
them put in the kind of grueling coding/debugging marathons that last
for 4-5 years of despair and a pitiful salary before it finally starts
to work that I put my guys through. We beat them mostly by working
harder and taking harder approaches that no one has chosen before
because it looked like too much work.
Maybe it WAS too much work.... oh well.... did it anyway....
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 12:34 Atomic filesystem or not Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 12:54 ` Claudio Martins
2004-07-15 13:25 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 19:43 ` David Masover
2004-07-15 19:52 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-16 1:46 ` David Masover
2004-07-19 8:33 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-19 9:23 ` Toby Dickenson
2004-07-19 21:03 ` reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not) David Masover
2004-07-19 22:07 ` John D. Heintz
2004-07-20 5:58 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-07-20 7:28 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 5:27 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:04 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 6:52 ` mjt
2004-07-20 7:39 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 8:03 ` mjt
2004-07-21 5:10 ` David Masover
2004-07-21 8:25 ` mjt
2004-07-22 8:08 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 14:30 ` reiser acceptance Hubert Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FCB46A.2020102@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=ctpm@ist.utl.pt \
--cc=jheintz@pobox.com \
--cc=marcel@hilzinger.hu \
--cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.