From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: Claudio Martins <ctpm@ist.utl.pt>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Marcel Hilzinger <marcel@hilzinger.hu>
Subject: Re: reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:04:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FCC417.7030502@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FCAD39.1040007@namesys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| David Masover wrote:
|>
|> What about JFS + hardware elevator sorting?
|
| I am not familiar with this, unless you mean disk drive hardware
| elevator sorting, which I suspect you don't mean.
If you suspect that, you must already be faster. Because that is
exactly what I mean -- that or SCSI controller hardware elevator sorting.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQIVAwUBQPzEFngHNmZLgCUhAQIueBAAiC/9BPF1n3WbAGVzyjSbzYatLhVZAmck
pG8Sy/5pospByp9TMiT8JxVmoaCVI+ElQa8am/G0gHwXuUezWl0eoW2TAcone5y2
vP5588fVvO4H5z3/KUeVPmYYIAzQQefw5VtBSc3CZ6PPJXFhB9ujMicJN37LHutH
Jz/Q0ptHLWH84v55HzEwDCRLwLxtFlkaUTXg7IguBXSo+A/LF9itVaf4IdVCxX7k
kV7fNsPkegcY2MDM0c62f4HqtIRX/22DE/X/T9rhSis6Cq5T+bD/f2FOZcACIKbM
rpI8KiM7FTxGkDIgUmb+3mgVxOmjaFYK7M3NC8whNkSXYFvdOZ0NyH5RseFrpAH5
4kTjer0JpR7Eq0dCB7GNHeVLbdWaqN705e0F2JUIKKXPFDDJbz7BJLjhm++SRbb9
cvFyxQs8DQXXdArE/2V6e5WlS/VKtj62ocou8BDB18w2Nf6GwjybVLa4zsHBUzyf
Yptgrd8EayQzuiAfDPdweDuXdOrEvLt6xrCQO2Atm4/BiFLOLNEep/5zJE3NYvCb
v5P9OJ/xBv8MIwHOwROSurSRzhseOeCbluMPS8gk5Kd6JrKW1i6+UDqq6dOhb/xX
SXBwkWfpksbcUAyB9tw/Ao1BPQbINwbGO2QAnYvg6dXcvF9B/TdKgh1J6alAidv4
Izik0EWCbJI=
=pscp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 7:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 12:34 Atomic filesystem or not Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 12:54 ` Claudio Martins
2004-07-15 13:25 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 19:43 ` David Masover
2004-07-15 19:52 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-16 1:46 ` David Masover
2004-07-19 8:33 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-19 9:23 ` Toby Dickenson
2004-07-19 21:03 ` reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not) David Masover
2004-07-19 22:07 ` John D. Heintz
2004-07-20 5:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:28 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 5:27 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:04 ` David Masover [this message]
2004-07-20 6:52 ` mjt
2004-07-20 7:39 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 8:03 ` mjt
2004-07-21 5:10 ` David Masover
2004-07-21 8:25 ` mjt
2004-07-22 8:08 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 14:30 ` reiser acceptance Hubert Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FCC417.7030502@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=ctpm@ist.utl.pt \
--cc=marcel@hilzinger.hu \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.