From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
To: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
Cc: "Markus Törnqvist" <mjt@nysv.org>,
"Claudio Martins" <ctpm@ist.utl.pt>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com,
"Marcel Hilzinger" <marcel@hilzinger.hu>
Subject: Re: reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not)
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 01:08:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FF7601.9070509@namesys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FCCC4F.6040709@slaphack.com>
David Masover wrote:
>
>
> Markus Törnqvist wrote:
> | On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 04:03:44PM -0500, David Masover wrote:
> |
> | But hopefully sys_reiser4 will be the standard, yes?
> | (Also, rename it to sys_reiser, the number makes it a bit more unclear,
> | more bound to the fs, not to the guy behind it)
>
> How many versions of Reiser will there be?
One every 3-5 years for ~30 years.
> If you can get a separate
> system call for each one, go for it. Then you can always support
> sys_reiser4 on newer versions, and people use sys_reiser5 and so on to
> support newer features.
That was the idea.
>
> Unless, that is, you've already made it so modular that people who call
> sys_reiser on reiser4 won't find it broken on reiser5. If you can do
> that without cruft, you are amazing, and the number should go.
I am not amazing, and prefer to keep the number.;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-22 8:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 12:34 Atomic filesystem or not Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 12:54 ` Claudio Martins
2004-07-15 13:25 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 19:43 ` David Masover
2004-07-15 19:52 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-16 1:46 ` David Masover
2004-07-19 8:33 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-19 9:23 ` Toby Dickenson
2004-07-19 21:03 ` reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not) David Masover
2004-07-19 22:07 ` John D. Heintz
2004-07-20 5:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:28 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 5:27 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:04 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 6:52 ` mjt
2004-07-20 7:39 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 8:03 ` mjt
2004-07-21 5:10 ` David Masover
2004-07-21 8:25 ` mjt
2004-07-22 8:08 ` Hans Reiser [this message]
2004-07-20 14:30 ` reiser acceptance Hubert Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FF7601.9070509@namesys.com \
--to=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=ctpm@ist.utl.pt \
--cc=marcel@hilzinger.hu \
--cc=mjt@nysv.org \
--cc=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.