From: David Masover <ninja@slaphack.com>
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
Cc: "John D. Heintz" <jheintz@pobox.com>,
Claudio Martins <ctpm@ist.utl.pt>,
reiserfs-list@namesys.com, Marcel Hilzinger <marcel@hilzinger.hu>
Subject: Re: reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 02:28:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <40FCC982.6070703@slaphack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FCB46A.2020102@namesys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hans Reiser wrote:
| David, I understand you mean well. You just don't understand what
| motivates technology trailers. They have no desire at all to innovate.
This, I do understand, and I thought that was part of why "libfsatom"
would be the way to go. Not only do they have little desire to innovate
(believe me, it's somewhere above "not at all" but way, way below "let's
change the world"), they also don't like to let innovations in unless
they already look pragmatic.
Still, I bow to your experience. I've said my piece. If you still
don't agree with me, saying it again won't change your mind.
And since we're doing things your way, I'll start with Gentoo -- a USE
flag and patches to fileutils. If/when sys_reiser4 is done/documented,
that is.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org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=cMxL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 7:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-15 12:34 Atomic filesystem or not Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 12:54 ` Claudio Martins
2004-07-15 13:25 ` Marcel Hilzinger
2004-07-15 19:43 ` David Masover
2004-07-15 19:52 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-16 1:46 ` David Masover
2004-07-19 8:33 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-19 9:23 ` Toby Dickenson
2004-07-19 21:03 ` reiser acceptance (was Re: Atomic filesystem or not) David Masover
2004-07-19 22:07 ` John D. Heintz
2004-07-20 5:58 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:28 ` David Masover [this message]
2004-07-20 5:27 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 7:04 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 6:52 ` mjt
2004-07-20 7:39 ` David Masover
2004-07-20 8:03 ` mjt
2004-07-21 5:10 ` David Masover
2004-07-21 8:25 ` mjt
2004-07-22 8:08 ` Hans Reiser
2004-07-20 14:30 ` reiser acceptance Hubert Chan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=40FCC982.6070703@slaphack.com \
--to=ninja@slaphack.com \
--cc=ctpm@ist.utl.pt \
--cc=jheintz@pobox.com \
--cc=marcel@hilzinger.hu \
--cc=reiser@namesys.com \
--cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.