From: Timothy Miller <miller@techsource.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
arjanv@redhat.com, Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 11:43:58 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <417687BE.5020900@techsource.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409101555510.16784-100000@localhost.localdomain>
Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> Wasn't Andrea worried, a couple of months back, about nested interrupts
> overflowing the 4K interrupt stack? He was trying to work out how to
> have an 8K interrupt stack even with the 4K task stack, proposed thread
> info at both top and bottom of stack; but his "current" still looked to
> me like it'd be significantly more costly than the present one.
Yeah, one of the driving forces behind going to 4K task stacks is that
you significantly reduce the amount of kernel memory reserved for user
processes. But then, there came the requirement to keep around a
handful of irq stacks which doesn't hurt.
Given the finite and small number of IRQ stacks required, I see no
reason not to make them 8K, other than for elegance sake. You're not
really wasting much memory by giving IRQ's 8k stacks.
Yes, I know, it does feel icky, though. :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-20 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-09 23:25 [PATCH 1/3] Separate IRQ-stacks from 4K-stacks option Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-09 23:55 ` Brian Gerst
2004-09-09 23:59 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-10 6:40 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 6:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-10 6:52 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 7:15 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-10 7:21 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 7:23 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-10 7:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 9:12 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-10 9:14 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-10 10:27 ` Russell King
2004-09-10 14:30 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-10 15:06 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-10 15:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-09-10 15:12 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-10 15:15 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 15:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-10 15:09 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-10 15:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-12 14:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-12 15:03 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-12 15:45 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 16:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-20 16:27 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-21 15:18 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 19:18 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-12 19:25 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-12 19:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 19:40 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-09-12 19:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 20:33 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-12 21:36 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-12 22:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-12 22:25 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-13 6:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-13 7:27 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-15 19:43 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-15 19:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-15 20:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-15 20:39 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 17:50 ` Timothy Miller
2004-09-13 7:32 ` Jens Axboe
2004-09-13 10:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-09-13 10:34 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-13 12:30 ` Jens Axboe
2004-10-20 17:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-09-13 10:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-09-13 20:26 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-14 5:20 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 15:46 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-20 15:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-10-20 16:39 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 16:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-20 16:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 17:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-20 17:15 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 17:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-20 17:58 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-20 17:55 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 18:25 ` Timothy Miller
2004-10-20 18:28 ` Lee Revell
2004-10-20 18:51 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-20 23:19 ` Lee Revell
2004-09-10 15:16 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-20 15:43 ` Timothy Miller [this message]
2004-10-20 15:35 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-09-10 15:58 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
2004-09-10 16:19 ` Nathan Bryant
2004-09-10 17:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-10 17:54 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-09-10 9:27 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=417687BE.5020900@techsource.com \
--to=miller@techsource.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.