[LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

[LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

[sanjeev ravindran]

Hi,

I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum priority?

Any help is most appreciated,
Thanks in advance,
Sanjeev 
-- 
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.


Powered by Outblaze
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

[Tóth Nándor]

Hi!

sanjeev ravindran wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum priority?
> 
> Any help is most appreciated,
> Thanks in advance,
> Sanjeev 

http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio

"Priorizing traffic has two sides. First it affects how the excess 
bandwidth is distributed among siblings. Up to now we have seen that 
excess bandwidth was distibuted according to rate ratios. Now I used 
basic configuration from chapter 3 (hierarchy without ceiling and 
bursts) and changed priority of all classes to 1 except SMTP (green) 
which I set to 0 (higher).
 From sharing view you see that the class got all the excess bandwidth. 
The rule is that classes with higher priority are offered excess 
bandwidth first. But rules about guaranted rate and ceil are still met."

-- 
Udv,
   Nandor
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

[sanjeev ravindran]

Thank you for ur response,
Actually I too found the same in user guide of htb... however i was bit confused about the priority of
different classes.... now things are clear...
thanks again
sanjeev



----- Original Message -----
From: "Tóth Nándor" <nug@sch.bme.hu>
To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:12 +0100

> 
> Hi!
> 
> sanjeev ravindran wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with 
> > HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum 
> > priority?
> >
> > Any help is most appreciated,
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Sanjeev
> 
> http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio
> 
> "Priorizing traffic has two sides. First it affects how the excess 
> bandwidth is distributed among siblings. Up to now we have seen 
> that excess bandwidth was distibuted according to rate ratios. Now 
> I used basic configuration from chapter 3 (hierarchy without 
> ceiling and bursts) and changed priority of all classes to 1 except 
> SMTP (green) which I set to 0 (higher).
>  From sharing view you see that the class got all the excess 
> bandwidth. The rule is that classes with higher priority are 
> offered excess bandwidth first. But rules about guaranted rate and 
> ceil are still met."
> 
> -- Udv,
>    Nandor
> _______________________________________________
> LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

-- 
______________________________________________
Check out the latest SMS services @ http://www.linuxmail.org 
This allows you to send and receive SMS through your mailbox.


Powered by Outblaze
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB

[Dmitry Golubev]

Are you sure we do care about priorities of inner classes? It seems for me 
that you do not even have this entry in the memory structure in case of inner 
class - only leaf classes have prios.

Dmitry

On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:47, "sanjeev ravindran" 
<sanjeev_ravindran@linuxmail.org> wrote:
> Thank you for ur response,
> Actually I too found the same in user guide of htb... however i was bit
> confused about the priority of different classes.... now things are
> clear...
> thanks again
> sanjeev
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tóth Nándor" <nug@sch.bme.hu>
> To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
> Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB
> Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:12 +0100
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > sanjeev ravindran wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with
> > > HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum
> > > priority?
> > >
> > > Any help is most appreciated,
> > > Thanks in advance,
> > > Sanjeev
> >
> > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio
> >
> > "Priorizing traffic has two sides. First it affects how the excess
> > bandwidth is distributed among siblings. Up to now we have seen
> > that excess bandwidth was distibuted according to rate ratios. Now
> > I used basic configuration from chapter 3 (hierarchy without
> > ceiling and bursts) and changed priority of all classes to 1 except
> > SMTP (green) which I set to 0 (higher).
> >  From sharing view you see that the class got all the excess
> > bandwidth. The rule is that classes with higher priority are
> > offered excess bandwidth first. But rules about guaranted rate and
> > ceil are still met."
> >
> > -- Udv,
> >    Nandor
> > _______________________________________________
> > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
> > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/