All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: ports
       [not found] <20050307032130.C195512043@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net>
@ 2005-03-07  3:28 ` maru
  2005-03-07  6:13   ` ports Kip Macy
                     ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: maru @ 2005-03-07  3:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

Is there any talk of porting OpenBSD to Xen too?
I mean, Free and NetBSD are ported, and Linux and Plan 9
(and seriously, who uses Plan 9?  yeah, It's got some very cool
features, but was it worth porting?) are ported, so why not
OpenBSD?


~Maru
Also, Xen: very awesome.


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: ports
  2005-03-07  3:28 ` ports maru
@ 2005-03-07  6:13   ` Kip Macy
  2005-03-07 14:16   ` Dave Feustel
  2005-03-07 16:00   ` Ronald G. Minnich
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Kip Macy @ 2005-03-07  6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: maru; +Cc: xen-devel

> Is there any talk of porting OpenBSD to Xen too?

This has come up before.

Talk to the OpenBSD folks. Christian Limpach did the work as a NetBSD
developer. Plan 9 was done by a Plan 9 developer. I did the work as a
user of FreeBSD. Only Linux was done by the Xen team. If you or
someone else steps forward, Christian would probably be happy to
answer questions. FreeBSD is too far diverged to really help.

                   -Kip


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: ports
  2005-03-07 16:00   ` Ronald G. Minnich
@ 2005-03-07 11:36     ` Rich Persaud
  2005-03-07 16:37       ` Ronald G. Minnich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Rich Persaud @ 2005-03-07 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ronald G. Minnich; +Cc: maru, xen-devel

Ronald G. Minnich wrote:

>On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, maru wrote:
>
>  
>
>>(and seriously, who uses Plan 9?  yeah, It's got some very cool
>>features, but was it worth porting?)
>>    
>>
>
>This type of question, appearing on a research list, still amazes me.
>
>Yes, the port was worth the effort. 
>
>ron
>  
>
This is what happens when you don't separate xen-users from 
xen-developers. 

Having said that, when I was compiling the index of virtualization 
papers, I could not find papers on the nuances of Xen porting.    
Perhaps this is not a common research topic in virtualization because 
other para-virtualization efforts have not attracted as many ports as 
Xen.  An index of Xen porting resources could help future ports.  In the 
absence of papers, are there known mailing list threads or other notes 
that could be compiled into an index?  E.g. a comparison of the Plan 9 
and NetBSD ports.

Rich


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: ports
  2005-03-07  3:28 ` ports maru
  2005-03-07  6:13   ` ports Kip Macy
@ 2005-03-07 14:16   ` Dave Feustel
  2005-03-07 16:00   ` Ronald G. Minnich
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Feustel @ 2005-03-07 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel

On Sunday 06 March 2005 10:28 pm, maru wrote:
> Is there any talk of porting OpenBSD to Xen too?
> I mean, Free and NetBSD are ported, and Linux and Plan 9
> (and seriously, who uses Plan 9?  yeah, It's got some very cool
> features, but was it worth porting?) are ported, so why not
> OpenBSD?
> 
> 
> ~Maru
> Also, Xen: very awesome.
> 

Maru,

I am only posting this to you since my postings to the xen list often never 
show up. As an OpenBSD user I am waiting for Vanderpool technology(VP) 
which will obviate the need to customize OpenBSD for Xen without VP.
The OpenBSD project does not (IMHO) have enough developer resources 
to support a temporary modification to the OS to permit it to run with the 
current  version of Xen. 

I only speak for myself, not the OpenBSD  developers.

Dave Feustel


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id\x14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: ports
  2005-03-07  3:28 ` ports maru
  2005-03-07  6:13   ` ports Kip Macy
  2005-03-07 14:16   ` Dave Feustel
@ 2005-03-07 16:00   ` Ronald G. Minnich
  2005-03-07 11:36     ` Rich Persaud
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ronald G. Minnich @ 2005-03-07 16:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: maru; +Cc: xen-devel



On Sun, 6 Mar 2005, maru wrote:

> (and seriously, who uses Plan 9?  yeah, It's got some very cool
> features, but was it worth porting?)

This type of question, appearing on a research list, still amazes me.

Yes, the port was worth the effort. 

ron


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: Re: ports
  2005-03-07 11:36     ` Rich Persaud
@ 2005-03-07 16:37       ` Ronald G. Minnich
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ronald G. Minnich @ 2005-03-07 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rich Persaud; +Cc: maru, xen-devel

I started a paper on the plan 9 port, complete with all the mistakes I 
made along the way. I probably ought to finish it.

ron



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2005-03-07 16:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20050307032130.C195512043@sc8-sf-spam2.sourceforge.net>
2005-03-07  3:28 ` ports maru
2005-03-07  6:13   ` ports Kip Macy
2005-03-07 14:16   ` Dave Feustel
2005-03-07 16:00   ` Ronald G. Minnich
2005-03-07 11:36     ` Rich Persaud
2005-03-07 16:37       ` Ronald G. Minnich

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.