Re: [ SEMANAGE ] Introduce record table

[Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@cornell.edu>]

>(*key_free) prototype in src/record_file.h returns int, but the
>implementations return void.  I assume void is correct.
>  
>
void is correct - the free function should not fail.

>Is there any concern about future namespace collision for the
>dbase*/record* types, even though they are private to the library?  What
>about when you start providing real implementations that have to bring
>in external headers that may have conflicts?
>  
>
Yes, I am concerned about namespace collision, since I run into it all 
the time. However, I think it should be possible to eliminate it 
completely. In particular, specific record types should *never* be 
defined in headers. They're to be used in implementations only, and only 
in files that manipulate one type of record.

--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.