From: Ivan Gyurdiev <ivg2@cornell.edu>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: Joshua Brindle <jbrindle@tresys.com>,
SELinux List <SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [ SEPOL ] Move more things to newer debug system
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:24:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <432EE64C.60408@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1127141128.29404.73.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
>What do you expect from the callbacks?
>
That's a good question - I'm not entirely sure. I guess that's why I'm
trying to push the issue outside the library so we don't have to make
that kind of decision.
It's important, IMHO, that the user not be forced to use stdout/stderr
for debugging. I think both approaches accomplish that. Then it's
important to allow the caller to recognize which thread created the
problem - that's Joshua's concern. This means that we *need*
caller-supplied state at the point of debugging, or we can't accomplish
this (whether that's the address of a per-thread buffer, or whether it's
the thread ID available to a callback function, or whatever).
The issue of callback vs buffer is less important - I guess it seems
more flexible to me to have a callback function, instead of having to
worry about allocating buffers, looking inside the buffers, deallocating
buffers... but if you disagree we can use buffers.
>They can certainly do simple
>things like drop the entire message based on level, drop the function
>name information, etc, but constructing an overall error message that is
>presentable to the client/user from the entire set of DEBUG() calls
>seems difficult.
>
>
Yes, I wouldn't expect the callback to have the logic to do that -
that's just a question of policy on how you use the debug system in your
code, and at which point you issue error messages.
>>If we design the debug system properly, we can handle any usage pattern,
>>including this one.
>>
>>
>
>True, but if this is the only usage pattern (in addition to the default
>one of writing all DEBUG output to the user and not using the error
>buffers at all for single-threaded users), then it seems overkill.
>
>
Which part, specifically, seems like overkill?
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-19 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-12 12:06 [ SEMANAGE ] Stub out user/port functionality Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-12 14:14 ` [ SEMANAGE ] Introduce record table Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-13 3:55 ` [ SEPOL ] Move more things to newer debug system Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-13 19:59 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-13 22:26 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-13 23:03 ` Joshua Brindle
2005-09-14 3:33 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 3:37 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 13:16 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 14:05 ` Dale Amon
2005-09-14 18:07 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 23:44 ` Dale Amon
2005-09-14 7:00 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-09-14 12:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 7:01 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-09-14 13:00 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 13:21 ` Joshua Brindle
2005-09-14 13:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 14:45 ` Joshua Brindle
2005-09-14 15:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 15:26 ` info on SELinux support for IPSEC Prakash Saivasan
2005-09-14 18:20 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 15:33 ` [ SEPOL ] Move more things to newer debug system Joshua Brindle
2005-09-14 15:38 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 16:06 ` Joshua Brindle
2005-09-14 16:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 17:16 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 17:21 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 18:53 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-16 13:48 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-09-14 19:37 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 19:50 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 20:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 20:32 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-15 7:31 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-15 12:22 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-15 13:01 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-15 15:17 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-15 16:03 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-16 12:19 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-18 3:14 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-16 13:45 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-09-16 13:55 ` Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
2005-09-18 3:16 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-18 3:52 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-18 15:45 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-19 12:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-19 14:05 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-19 14:45 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-19 16:24 ` Ivan Gyurdiev [this message]
2005-09-19 16:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-19 17:16 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-19 18:26 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 19:57 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 12:35 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 15:51 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-13 19:43 ` [ SEMANAGE ] Introduce record table Stephen Smalley
2005-09-13 22:15 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-13 22:46 ` Ivan Gyurdiev
2005-09-14 15:46 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-09-14 15:45 ` [ SEMANAGE ] Stub out user/port functionality Stephen Smalley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=432EE64C.60408@cornell.edu \
--to=ivg2@cornell.edu \
--cc=SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=jbrindle@tresys.com \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.