All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, maule@sgi.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	shaohua.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:19:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44198210.6090109@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060315235544.GA6504@suse.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]

Greg KH wrote:
> No, we don't need a linux/msi.h, these are core pci things that no one
> else should care about.  The other arches handle this just fine, let's
> not mess everything up just because ia64 can't get it right :)

Hmm, it sounds asm/msi.h shouldn't be included from common headers. :<
I think the attached patch might be better. How about this?

Default msi_arch_init() looks sufficient for most ia64 platforms
except for SGI SN2, which seems to need its special version.
gregkh-pci-msi-vector-targeting-abstractions.patch used machvec
to switch the functions between platforms.
For that, it included asm/msi.h from asm/machvec.h and
caused the warnings flood.
The attached patch separates machvec function and the original
inline function. So that we don't need to include asm/msi.h from
common headers.


There is another problem that CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC still doesn't
build due to error in SGI SN specific code.
It needs additional fix.

Thanks,
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc.

[-- Attachment #2: ia64-machvec-based-msi-init.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1293 bytes --]

asm/msi.h is a private header for core pci code.
It should not be included from common header.

Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>

--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/include/asm-ia64/msi.h	2006-03-14 13:54:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/include/asm-ia64/msi.h	2006-03-16 01:36:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ static inline void set_intr_gate (int nr
 extern struct msi_ops msi_apic_ops;
 
 /* default ia64 msi init routine */
-static inline int ia64_msi_init(void)
+static inline int msi_arch_init(void)
 {
+	if (platform_msi_init)
+		return platform_msi_init();
 	msi_register(&msi_apic_ops);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define msi_arch_init		platform_msi_init	/* in asm/machvec.h */
-
 #endif /* ASM_MSI_H */
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/include/asm-ia64/machvec.h	2006-03-16 01:22:49.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/include/asm-ia64/machvec.h	2006-03-16 01:40:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -404,12 +404,7 @@ extern ia64_mv_dma_supported		swiotlb_dm
 # define platform_migrate machvec_noop_task
 #endif
 #ifndef platform_msi_init
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-#include <asm/msi.h>		/* pull in ia64_msi_init() */
-# define platform_msi_init	ia64_msi_init
-#else
 # define platform_msi_init	NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_IA64_MACHVEC_H */

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, maule@sgi.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org,
	shaohua.li@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:19:44 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <44198210.6090109@ce.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060315235544.GA6504@suse.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]

Greg KH wrote:
> No, we don't need a linux/msi.h, these are core pci things that no one
> else should care about.  The other arches handle this just fine, let's
> not mess everything up just because ia64 can't get it right :)

Hmm, it sounds asm/msi.h shouldn't be included from common headers. :<
I think the attached patch might be better. How about this?

Default msi_arch_init() looks sufficient for most ia64 platforms
except for SGI SN2, which seems to need its special version.
gregkh-pci-msi-vector-targeting-abstractions.patch used machvec
to switch the functions between platforms.
For that, it included asm/msi.h from asm/machvec.h and
caused the warnings flood.
The attached patch separates machvec function and the original
inline function. So that we don't need to include asm/msi.h from
common headers.


There is another problem that CONFIG_IA64_GENERIC still doesn't
build due to error in SGI SN specific code.
It needs additional fix.

Thanks,
-- 
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Solutions (America), Inc.

[-- Attachment #2: ia64-machvec-based-msi-init.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1293 bytes --]

asm/msi.h is a private header for core pci code.
It should not be included from common header.

Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com>

--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/include/asm-ia64/msi.h	2006-03-14 13:54:11.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/include/asm-ia64/msi.h	2006-03-16 01:36:44.000000000 -0500
@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ static inline void set_intr_gate (int nr
 extern struct msi_ops msi_apic_ops;
 
 /* default ia64 msi init routine */
-static inline int ia64_msi_init(void)
+static inline int msi_arch_init(void)
 {
+	if (platform_msi_init)
+		return platform_msi_init();
 	msi_register(&msi_apic_ops);
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#define msi_arch_init		platform_msi_init	/* in asm/machvec.h */
-
 #endif /* ASM_MSI_H */
--- linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1.orig/include/asm-ia64/machvec.h	2006-03-16 01:22:49.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.16-rc6-mm1/include/asm-ia64/machvec.h	2006-03-16 01:40:34.000000000 -0500
@@ -404,12 +404,7 @@ extern ia64_mv_dma_supported		swiotlb_dm
 # define platform_migrate machvec_noop_task
 #endif
 #ifndef platform_msi_init
-#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
-#include <asm/msi.h>		/* pull in ia64_msi_init() */
-# define platform_msi_init	ia64_msi_init
-#else
 # define platform_msi_init	NULL
-#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_MSI */
 #endif
 
 #endif /* _ASM_IA64_MACHVEC_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-16 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-14 21:01 [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 21:01 ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 21:45 ` [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of Andrew Morton
2006-03-14 21:45   ` [PATCH] (-mm) drivers/pci/msi: explicit declaration of msi_register Andrew Morton
2006-03-14 21:59   ` Greg KH
2006-03-14 21:59     ` Greg KH
2006-03-14 22:25     ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-14 22:25       ` Matthew Wilcox
2006-03-15  0:51   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15  0:51     ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15 23:55     ` Greg KH
2006-03-15 23:55       ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 15:19       ` Jun'ichi Nomura [this message]
2006-03-16 15:19         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 18:19         ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 18:19           ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 19:32           ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 19:32             ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 19:41             ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 19:41               ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 23:28               ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:28                 ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:37                 ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-16 23:37                   ` Roland Dreier
2006-03-16 23:45                   ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:45                     ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:47                   ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:47                     ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:41           ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:41             ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-16 23:49             ` Greg KH
2006-03-16 23:49               ` Greg KH
2006-03-17  0:41               ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-17  0:41                 ` Grant Grundler
2006-03-17  1:18                 ` Mark Maule
2006-03-17  1:18                   ` Mark Maule
2006-03-16 15:29       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-16 15:29         ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 21:57 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14 21:57   ` Adrian Bunk
2006-03-14 23:55   ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-14 23:55     ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15  0:09     ` Mark Maule
2006-03-15  0:09       ` Mark Maule
2006-03-15  1:04       ` Jun'ichi Nomura
2006-03-15  1:04         ` Jun'ichi Nomura

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=44198210.6090109@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --to=j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maule@sgi.com \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.