* Kernel 2.4?
@ 2006-05-19 13:46 Yuzhong Sun
2006-05-19 13:58 ` Vincent Hanquez
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yuzhong Sun @ 2006-05-19 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 427 bytes --]
I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. However, the stable release of
openMosix is based on Linux Kernel 2.4(They are trying to port it to kernel
2.6).
So, how can I create Linux Kernel 2.4 (i.e., Fedora 1) guest OS on top of
CentOS 4.3?
I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower kernel version such as 2.4 kernel.
There is some open sources based on kernel 2.4.
Thanks for your help in advance!
-Yuzhong
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4235 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Kernel 2.4?
2006-05-19 13:46 Kernel 2.4? Yuzhong Sun
@ 2006-05-19 13:58 ` Vincent Hanquez
2006-05-19 15:11 ` 答复: [Xen-devel] " Yuzhong Sun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vincent Hanquez @ 2006-05-19 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuzhong Sun; +Cc: xen-devel
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +0800, Yuzhong Sun wrote:
> I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. However, the stable release of
> openMosix is based on Linux Kernel 2.4(They are trying to port it to kernel
> 2.6).
There's lots more work to port 2.4 kernels to Xen-3, than to finish 2.6
openmosix. Now you could just use Xen-2, which support 2.4 kernels.
Patching 2.4 kernel on Xen2 with openmosix should be trivial.
> I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower kernel version such as 2.4 kernel.
> There is some open sources based on kernel 2.4.
I wouldn't count openmosix-2.4 as a good source here ...
--
Vincent Hanquez
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* 答复: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.4?
2006-05-19 13:58 ` Vincent Hanquez
@ 2006-05-19 15:11 ` Yuzhong Sun
2006-05-19 15:35 ` Ronald G Minnich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Yuzhong Sun @ 2006-05-19 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Vincent Hanquez'; +Cc: xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1115 bytes --]
In fact, we are trying to build a virtual cluster on a set of VMs on top of
Xen. OpenMosix or Open SSI are available open-source cluster management
tools. Do you know the better guys?
Thanks
-Yuzhong
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Vincent Hanquez [mailto:tab@snarc.org]
发送时间: 2006年5月19日 21:59
收件人: Yuzhong Sun
抄送: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
主题: Re: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.4?
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:46:19PM +0800, Yuzhong Sun wrote:
> I am porting OpenMosix on top of Xen. However, the stable release of
> openMosix is based on Linux Kernel 2.4(They are trying to port it to
kernel
> 2.6).
There's lots more work to port 2.4 kernels to Xen-3, than to finish 2.6
openmosix. Now you could just use Xen-2, which support 2.4 kernels.
Patching 2.4 kernel on Xen2 with openmosix should be trivial.
> I wonder why Xen didn't support the lower kernel version such as 2.4
kernel.
> There is some open sources based on kernel 2.4.
I wouldn't count openmosix-2.4 as a good source here ...
--
Vincent Hanquez
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 7056 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 答复: [Xen-devel] Kernel 2.4?
2006-05-19 15:11 ` 答复: [Xen-devel] " Yuzhong Sun
@ 2006-05-19 15:35 ` Ronald G Minnich
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ronald G Minnich @ 2006-05-19 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yuzhong Sun; +Cc: 'Vincent Hanquez', xen-devel
Yuzhong Sun wrote:
> In fact, we are trying to build a virtual cluster on a set of VMs on top
> of Xen. OpenMosix or Open SSI are available open-source cluster
> management tools. Do you know the better guys?
sure. You can build virtual bproc clusters. bproc is a much lighter
weight system than opemmosix or openssi. We run 12,000 CPUs of cluster
here at LANL with bproc. It's very nice.
If you are interested I can get you a writeup on how we did this. The
work was done about 18 months ago.
for more info on bproc, see clustermatic.org. The next-gen bproc we are
doing, called xcpu, is even lighter weight than bproc, and runs on any
kernel, though for full capability it is good to have kernels >=2.6.14
ron
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-05-19 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-05-19 13:46 Kernel 2.4? Yuzhong Sun
2006-05-19 13:58 ` Vincent Hanquez
2006-05-19 15:11 ` 答复: [Xen-devel] " Yuzhong Sun
2006-05-19 15:35 ` Ronald G Minnich
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.