All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* QEMU patch queue
@ 2006-10-22 17:30 Anthony Liguori
  2006-10-22 18:06 ` Ian Pratt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2006-10-22 17:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel, Christian Limpach

Howdy,

Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches just 
going right into unstable?  I took a look at Christian's pq tree on 
xenbits but it appears to have not been updated in a while.

I'm currently looking at the V2E work and there are quite a lot of QEMU 
changes (a lot of which probably get us closer back to mainline).

How do people feel about getting rid of the full QEMU tree in unstable 
and just having a patch queue?  I know there was talk about just using a 
patch queue for linux for 3.0.4.

I'd be willing to submit a patch to add the appropriate makefile magic 
so that make grabbed a copy of QEMU from somewhere and applied the patches.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* RE: QEMU patch queue
  2006-10-22 17:30 QEMU patch queue Anthony Liguori
@ 2006-10-22 18:06 ` Ian Pratt
  2006-10-23  0:37   ` Anthony Liguori
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ian Pratt @ 2006-10-22 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Anthony Liguori, xen-devel, Christian Limpach

> Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches
just
> going right into unstable?  

There already is a patch queue for QEMU within the unstable tree:
 tools/ioemu/patches/

The full tree is kept as a convenience, but the patch queue is the
definitive version.

Ian

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: QEMU patch queue
  2006-10-22 18:06 ` Ian Pratt
@ 2006-10-23  0:37   ` Anthony Liguori
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Anthony Liguori @ 2006-10-23  0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ian Pratt; +Cc: xen-devel, Christian Limpach

Ian Pratt wrote:
>> Are we still maintaining a QEMU patch queue anywhere or are patches
>>     
> just
>   
>> going right into unstable?  
>>     
>
> There already is a patch queue for QEMU within the unstable tree:
>  tools/ioemu/patches/
>
> The full tree is kept as a convenience, but the patch queue is the
> definitive version.
>   

There are changesets (such as the recent VNC password) that don't appear 
to have corresponding patches in tools/ioemu/patches.

Is the idea to apply the patches to the tree and have the patches in 
hg?  Should people be submitting patches against tools/ioemu/patches?

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Ian
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-10-23  0:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-10-22 17:30 QEMU patch queue Anthony Liguori
2006-10-22 18:06 ` Ian Pratt
2006-10-23  0:37   ` Anthony Liguori

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.