* asdf
@ 2001-10-11 10:53 thunder7
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: thunder7 @ 2001-10-11 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
While compiling 2.4.10-ac11 + keyboard fix for my alpha, I noted that
this is still printed very often:
/usr/src/linux-2.4.10ac11/include/linux/interrupt.h:77: warning: `__cpu_raise_softirq' redefined
/usr/src/linux-2.4.10ac11/include/asm/softirq.h:35: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
Good luck,
Jurriaan
--
You do understand that in my culture what you have just said would
constitute deliberate and possibly dangerous insult?
Michelle West - Sea of Sorrows
GNU/Linux 2.4.10-ac10 SMP/ReiserFS 2x1402 bogomips load av: 0.00 0.10 0.07
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2004-03-02 19:15 Jonathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan @ 2004-03-02 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6 bytes --]
asdf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2004-03-02 21:48 Jonathan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan @ 2004-03-02 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6 bytes --]
asdf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2006-07-06 10:15 Horms
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Horms @ 2006-07-06 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxppc-dev; +Cc: Paul Mackerras, Anton Blanchard
I have been looking at unifying the way that panic_on_oops logs
what it is doing between the different architectures that implement it.
The first cab off the rank is the patch below which removes a seemingly
silly difference between the behaviour on 32 and 64 bit powerpc.
I have not been able to test this as I do not have a ppc64 machine
at my disposal. However I did test that it compiles thanks to
the wonders of crosstool.
Signed-Off-By: Horms <horms@verge.net.au>
arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
index 52f5659..908231a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
@@ -157,10 +157,8 @@ #endif
panic("Fatal exception in interrupt");
if (panic_on_oops) {
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
printk(KERN_EMERG "Fatal exception: panic in 5 seconds\n");
ssleep(5);
-#endif
panic("Fatal exception");
}
do_exit(err);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] libata: put some intelligence into EH speed down sequence Tejun Heo
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide; +Cc: Tejun Heo
* Move forcing device to PIO0 on device disable into
ata_dev_disable(). This makes both old and new EHs act the same
way.
* Speed down only PIO mode on probe failure. All commands used during
probing are PIO commands. There's no point in speeding down DMA.
* Retry at least once after -ENODEV. Some devices report garbled
IDENTIFY data after certain events. This shouldn't cause device
detach and re-attach.
* Rearrange EH failure path for simplicity.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index 417394b..cbd4bf1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -596,6 +596,8 @@ void ata_dev_disable(struct ata_device *dev)
{
if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && ata_msg_drv(dev->ap)) {
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "disabled\n");
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 |
+ ATA_DNXFER_QUIET);
dev->class++;
}
}
@@ -1745,9 +1747,8 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
{
unsigned int classes[ATA_MAX_DEVICES];
int tries[ATA_MAX_DEVICES];
- int i, rc, down_xfermask;
+ int i, rc;
struct ata_device *dev;
- int dnxfer_sel;
ata_port_probe(ap);
@@ -1755,8 +1756,6 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
tries[i] = ATA_PROBE_MAX_TRIES;
retry:
- down_xfermask = 0;
-
/* reset and determine device classes */
ap->ops->phy_reset(ap);
@@ -1804,10 +1803,8 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
/* configure transfer mode */
rc = ata_set_mode(ap, &dev);
- if (rc) {
- down_xfermask = 1;
+ if (rc)
goto fail;
- }
for (i = 0; i < ATA_MAX_DEVICES; i++)
if (ata_dev_enabled(&ap->device[i]))
@@ -1819,27 +1816,29 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
return -ENODEV;
fail:
+ tries[dev->devno]--;
+
switch (rc) {
case -EINVAL:
- case -ENODEV:
+ /* eeek, something went very wrong, give up */
tries[dev->devno] = 0;
break;
+
+ case -ENODEV:
+ /* give it just one more chance */
+ tries[dev->devno] = min(tries[dev->devno], 1);
case -EIO:
- sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
- /* fall through */
- default:
- tries[dev->devno]--;
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
- if (tries[dev->devno] == 1)
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
- if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
- tries[dev->devno] = 0;
+ if (tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
+ /* This is the last chance, better to slow
+ * down than lose it.
+ */
+ sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_PIO);
+ }
}
- if (!tries[dev->devno]) {
- ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0);
+ if (!tries[dev->devno])
ata_dev_disable(dev);
- }
goto retry;
}
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 7b61562..1abfdba 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -1964,8 +1964,7 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
{
struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &ap->eh_context;
struct ata_device *dev;
- int down_xfermask, i, rc;
- int dnxfer_sel;
+ int i, rc;
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
@@ -1994,7 +1993,6 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
}
retry:
- down_xfermask = 0;
rc = 0;
/* if UNLOADING, finish immediately */
@@ -2039,10 +2037,8 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
/* configure transfer mode if necessary */
if (ehc->i.flags & ATA_EHI_SETMODE) {
rc = ata_set_mode(ap, &dev);
- if (rc) {
- down_xfermask = 1;
+ if (rc)
goto dev_fail;
- }
ehc->i.flags &= ~ATA_EHI_SETMODE;
}
@@ -2054,22 +2050,27 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
goto out;
dev_fail:
+ ehc->tries[dev->devno]--;
+
switch (rc) {
- case -ENODEV:
- /* device missing, schedule probing */
- ehc->i.probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
case -EINVAL:
+ /* eeek, something went very wrong, give up */
ehc->tries[dev->devno] = 0;
break;
+
+ case -ENODEV:
+ /* device missing or wrong IDENTIFY data, schedule probing */
+ ehc->i.probe_mask |= (1 << dev->devno);
+ /* give it just one more chance */
+ ehc->tries[dev->devno] = min(ehc->tries[dev->devno], 1);
case -EIO:
- sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
- default:
- ehc->tries[dev->devno]--;
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
- if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1)
- dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
- if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
- ehc->tries[dev->devno] = 0;
+ if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1) {
+ /* This is the last chance, better to slow
+ * down than lose it.
+ */
+ sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_PIO);
+ }
}
if (ata_dev_enabled(dev) && !ehc->tries[dev->devno]) {
--
1.4.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit()
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling Tejun Heo
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide; +Cc: Tejun Heo
Make ata_down_xfermask_limit() accept @sel instead of @force_pio0.
@sel selects how the xfermask limit will be adjusted. The following
selectors are defined.
* ATA_DNXFER_PIO : only speed down PIO
* ATA_DNXFER_DMA : only speed down DMA, don't cause transfer mode change
* ATA_DNXFER_40C : apply 40c cable limit
* ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO : force PIO
* ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 : force PIO0 (same as original with @force_pio0 == 1)
* ATA_DNXFER_ANY : same as original with @force_pio0 == 0
Currently, only ANY and FORCE_PIO0 are used to maintain the original
behavior. Other selectors will be used later to improve EH speed down
sequence.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 9 +++-
drivers/ata/libata.h | 12 +++++-
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index a441c75..417394b 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -1747,6 +1747,7 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
int tries[ATA_MAX_DEVICES];
int i, rc, down_xfermask;
struct ata_device *dev;
+ int dnxfer_sel;
ata_port_probe(ap);
@@ -1828,13 +1829,15 @@ int ata_bus_probe(struct ata_port *ap)
/* fall through */
default:
tries[dev->devno]--;
- if (down_xfermask &&
- ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, tries[dev->devno] == 1))
+ dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
+ if (tries[dev->devno] == 1)
+ dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
+ if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
tries[dev->devno] = 0;
}
if (!tries[dev->devno]) {
- ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, 1);
+ ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0);
ata_dev_disable(dev);
}
@@ -2267,7 +2270,7 @@ int ata_timing_compute(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned short speed,
/**
* ata_down_xfermask_limit - adjust dev xfer masks downward
* @dev: Device to adjust xfer masks
- * @force_pio0: Force PIO0
+ * @sel: ATA_DNXFER_* selector
*
* Adjust xfer masks of @dev downward. Note that this function
* does not apply the change. Invoking ata_set_mode() afterwards
@@ -2279,37 +2282,87 @@ int ata_timing_compute(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned short speed,
* RETURNS:
* 0 on success, negative errno on failure
*/
-int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, int force_pio0)
+int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int sel)
{
- unsigned long xfer_mask;
- int highbit;
+ char buf[32];
+ unsigned int orig_mask, xfer_mask;
+ unsigned int pio_mask, mwdma_mask, udma_mask;
+ int quiet, highbit;
- xfer_mask = ata_pack_xfermask(dev->pio_mask, dev->mwdma_mask,
- dev->udma_mask);
+ quiet = !!(sel & ATA_DNXFER_QUIET);
+ sel &= ~ATA_DNXFER_QUIET;
- if (!xfer_mask)
- goto fail;
- /* don't gear down to MWDMA from UDMA, go directly to PIO */
- if (xfer_mask & ATA_MASK_UDMA)
- xfer_mask &= ~ATA_MASK_MWDMA;
+ xfer_mask = orig_mask = ata_pack_xfermask(dev->pio_mask,
+ dev->mwdma_mask,
+ dev->udma_mask);
+ ata_unpack_xfermask(xfer_mask, &pio_mask, &mwdma_mask, &udma_mask);
- highbit = fls(xfer_mask) - 1;
- xfer_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
- if (force_pio0)
- xfer_mask &= 1 << ATA_SHIFT_PIO;
- if (!xfer_mask)
- goto fail;
+ switch (sel) {
+ case ATA_DNXFER_PIO:
+ highbit = fls(pio_mask) - 1;
+ pio_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
+ break;
+
+ case ATA_DNXFER_DMA:
+ if (udma_mask) {
+ highbit = fls(udma_mask) - 1;
+ udma_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
+ if (!udma_mask)
+ return -ENOENT;
+ } else if (mwdma_mask) {
+ highbit = fls(mwdma_mask) - 1;
+ mwdma_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
+ if (!mwdma_mask)
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+ break;
+
+ case ATA_DNXFER_40C:
+ udma_mask &= ATA_UDMA_MASK_40C;
+ break;
+
+ case ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0:
+ pio_mask &= 1;
+ case ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO:
+ mwdma_mask = 0;
+ udma_mask = 0;
+ break;
+
+ case ATA_DNXFER_ANY:
+ /* don't gear down to MWDMA from UDMA, go directly to PIO */
+ if (xfer_mask & ATA_MASK_UDMA)
+ xfer_mask &= ~ATA_MASK_MWDMA;
+
+ highbit = fls(xfer_mask) - 1;
+ xfer_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
+ break;
+
+ default:
+ BUG();
+ }
+
+ xfer_mask &= ata_pack_xfermask(pio_mask, mwdma_mask, udma_mask);
+
+ if (!(xfer_mask & ATA_MASK_PIO) || xfer_mask == orig_mask)
+ return -ENOENT;
+
+ if (!quiet) {
+ if (xfer_mask & (ATA_MASK_MWDMA | ATA_MASK_UDMA))
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s:%s",
+ ata_mode_string(xfer_mask),
+ ata_mode_string(xfer_mask & ATA_MASK_PIO));
+ else
+ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s",
+ ata_mode_string(xfer_mask));
+
+ ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
+ "limiting speed to %s\n", buf);
+ }
ata_unpack_xfermask(xfer_mask, &dev->pio_mask, &dev->mwdma_mask,
&dev->udma_mask);
- ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING, "limiting speed to %s\n",
- ata_mode_string(xfer_mask));
-
return 0;
-
- fail:
- return -EINVAL;
}
static int ata_dev_set_mode(struct ata_device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 52c85af..7b61562 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ static int ata_eh_speed_down(struct ata_device *dev, int is_io,
return ATA_EH_HARDRESET;
/* lower transfer mode */
- if (ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, 0) == 0)
+ if (ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_ANY) == 0)
return ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_ERR,
@@ -1965,6 +1965,7 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
struct ata_eh_context *ehc = &ap->eh_context;
struct ata_device *dev;
int down_xfermask, i, rc;
+ int dnxfer_sel;
DPRINTK("ENTER\n");
@@ -2064,8 +2065,10 @@ static int ata_eh_recover(struct ata_port *ap, ata_prereset_fn_t prereset,
sata_down_spd_limit(ap);
default:
ehc->tries[dev->devno]--;
- if (down_xfermask &&
- ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1))
+ dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_ANY;
+ if (ehc->tries[dev->devno] == 1)
+ dnxfer_sel = ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0;
+ if (down_xfermask && ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, dnxfer_sel))
ehc->tries[dev->devno] = 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
index 06ccf23..36e08d2 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
@@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ struct ata_scsi_args {
enum {
/* flags for ata_dev_read_id() */
ATA_READID_POSTRESET = (1 << 0), /* reading ID after reset */
+
+ /* selector for ata_down_xfermask_limit() */
+ ATA_DNXFER_PIO = 0, /* speed down PIO */
+ ATA_DNXFER_DMA = 1, /* speed down DMA */
+ ATA_DNXFER_40C = 2, /* apply 40c cable limit */
+ ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO = 3, /* force PIO */
+ ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 = 4, /* force PIO0 */
+ ATA_DNXFER_ANY = 5, /* speed down any */
+
+ ATA_DNXFER_QUIET = (1 << 31),
};
extern struct workqueue_struct *ata_aux_wq;
@@ -68,7 +78,7 @@ extern int ata_dev_revalidate(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int flags);
extern int ata_dev_configure(struct ata_device *dev);
extern int sata_down_spd_limit(struct ata_port *ap);
extern int sata_set_spd_needed(struct ata_port *ap);
-extern int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, int force_pio0);
+extern int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int sel);
extern int ata_set_mode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device **r_failed_dev);
extern void ata_sg_clean(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
extern void ata_qc_free(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc);
--
1.4.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
` (6 more replies)
0 siblings, 7 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide, htejun
Hello,
The current EH speed down code is more of a feature demonstration and
goes through rdiculously many meaningless steps when condition is met.
This patchset tries to put some intelligence into speed down sequence.
The goal is to achieve reasonable number of speed down steps
reasonably spaced from one another and consider NCQ, cable type and
the current protocol when determining speed down steps, while not
bloating the code too much with nitty gritty details.
Roughly, the rules are...
1. If NCQ and protocol/timeout/unknown dev errors occur, turn off NCQ
2. If excessive transfer errors occur, speed down within the current
transfer mode (UDMA/MWDMA/PIO). If UDMA, it's first adjusted down
a step, if error conditions persist, 40c limit is applied. Speed
down is done only twice.
3. If PATA && used up all DMA speed down steps && a LOT of
transmission/unknown errors occur, switch to PIO. So, we never
automatically step down to PIO on SATA. This is intended. Some
SATA hdd even seems to have problem with PIO data transfer
commands.
The last patch makes ahci report HSM violation error on spurious
completion of NCQ commands, thus causing NCQ off after several such
incidents. These drives should be blacklisted for DMA eventually.
This patchset is against...
upstream (eb0e63cca36a3389f0ccab4584f6d479b983fad5)
+ [1] pata_platform-fix-devres-conversion
+ [2] libata-convert-to-iomap
Ric, I guess this resolves the to-do item from you which has been
sitting in my mailbox for way too long. What do you think about the
rules?
Thanks.
--
tejun
[1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/488509
[2] hmm.. can't find it any archive. Might have been ignored due to
size. Jeff, did you receive it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] libata: put some intelligence into EH speed down sequence Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] libata: kill ATA_DNXFER_ANY Tejun Heo
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide; +Cc: Tejun Heo
SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions is a clear protocol
violation. Currently, only some Maxtors with early firmware revisions
are showing this problem. Those firmwares have other NCQ related
problems including buggy NCQ error reporting and occasional lock up
after NCQ errors.
Consider spurious NCQ completions HSM violation and freeze the port
after it. EH will turn off NCQ after this happens several times.
Eventually drives which show this behavior should be blacklisted for
NCQ.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 8f1d753..1d8d377 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -199,7 +199,6 @@ struct ahci_port_priv {
void *rx_fis;
dma_addr_t rx_fis_dma;
/* for NCQ spurious interrupt analysis */
- int ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt;
unsigned int ncq_saw_d2h:1;
unsigned int ncq_saw_dmas:1;
};
@@ -1157,23 +1156,24 @@ static void ahci_host_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
known_irq = 1;
}
- if (status & PORT_IRQ_SDB_FIS &&
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt < 10) {
+ if (status & PORT_IRQ_SDB_FIS) {
/* SDB FIS containing spurious completions might be
- * dangerous, we need to know more about them. Print
- * more of it.
+ * dangerous, whine and fail commands with HSM
+ * violation. EH will turn off NCQ after several such
+ * failures.
*/
const u32 *f = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_SDB;
- ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_INFO, "Spurious SDB FIS during NCQ "
- "issue=0x%x SAct=0x%x FIS=%08x:%08x%s\n",
- readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE),
- readl(port_mmio + PORT_SCR_ACT),
- le32_to_cpu(f[0]), le32_to_cpu(f[1]),
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt < 10 ?
- "" : ", shutting up");
+ ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, "spurious completion during NCQ "
+ "issue=0x%x SAct=0x%x FIS=%08x:%08x",
+ readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE),
+ readl(port_mmio + PORT_SCR_ACT),
+ le32_to_cpu(f[0]), le32_to_cpu(f[1]));
+
+ ehi->err_mask |= AC_ERR_HSM;
+ ehi->action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
+ ata_port_freeze(ap);
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt++;
known_irq = 1;
}
--
1.4.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 4/5] libata: kill ATA_DNXFER_ANY
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:24 ` Subject is [PATCH,RESEND] libata: put some intelligence into speed down sequence Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 16:59 ` asdf Ric Wheeler
6 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide; +Cc: Tejun Heo
ATA_DNXFER_ANY isn't used anymore. Kill it.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 9 ---------
drivers/ata/libata.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
index cbd4bf1..651ab4b 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-core.c
@@ -2327,15 +2327,6 @@ int ata_down_xfermask_limit(struct ata_device *dev, unsigned int sel)
udma_mask = 0;
break;
- case ATA_DNXFER_ANY:
- /* don't gear down to MWDMA from UDMA, go directly to PIO */
- if (xfer_mask & ATA_MASK_UDMA)
- xfer_mask &= ~ATA_MASK_MWDMA;
-
- highbit = fls(xfer_mask) - 1;
- xfer_mask &= ~(1 << highbit);
- break;
-
default:
BUG();
}
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata.h b/drivers/ata/libata.h
index 36e08d2..6fc6260 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata.h
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata.h
@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ enum {
ATA_DNXFER_40C = 2, /* apply 40c cable limit */
ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO = 3, /* force PIO */
ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 = 4, /* force PIO0 */
- ATA_DNXFER_ANY = 5, /* speed down any */
ATA_DNXFER_QUIET = (1 << 31),
};
--
1.4.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/5] libata: put some intelligence into EH speed down sequence
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:22 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation Tejun Heo
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff, alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide; +Cc: Tejun Heo
The current EH speed down code is more of a proof that the EH
framework is capable of adjusting transfer speed in response to error.
This patch puts some intelligence into EH speed down sequence. The
rules are..
* If there have been more than three timeout, HSM violation or
unclassified DEV errors for known supported commands during last 10
mins, NCQ is turned off.
* If there have been more than three timeout or HSM violation for known
supported command, transfer mode is slowed down. If DMA is active,
it is first slowered by one grade (e.g. UDMA133->100). If that
doesn't help, it's slowered to 40c limit (UDMA33). If PIO is
active, it's slowered by one grade first. If that doesn't help,
PIO0 is forced. Note that this rule does not change transfer mode.
DMA is never degraded into PIO by this rule.
* If there have been more than ten ATA bus, timeout, HSM violation or
unclassified device errors for known supported commands && speeding
down DMA mode didn't help, the device is forced into PIO mode. Note
that this rule is considered only for PATA devices and is pretty
difficult to trigger.
One error can only trigger one rule at a time. After a rule is
triggered, error history is cleared such that the next speed down
happens only after some number of errors are accumulated. This makes
sense because now speed down is done in bigger stride.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 184 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
include/linux/libata.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 1abfdba..3173862 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -44,6 +44,12 @@
#include "libata.h"
+enum {
+ ATA_EH_SPDN_NCQ_OFF = (1 << 0),
+ ATA_EH_SPDN_SPEED_DOWN = (1 << 1),
+ ATA_EH_SPDN_FALLBACK_TO_PIO = (1 << 2),
+};
+
static void __ata_port_freeze(struct ata_port *ap);
static void ata_eh_finish(struct ata_port *ap);
static void ata_eh_handle_port_suspend(struct ata_port *ap);
@@ -65,12 +71,9 @@ static void ata_ering_record(struct ata_ering *ering, int is_io,
ent->timestamp = get_jiffies_64();
}
-static struct ata_ering_entry * ata_ering_top(struct ata_ering *ering)
+static void ata_ering_clear(struct ata_ering *ering)
{
- struct ata_ering_entry *ent = &ering->ring[ering->cursor];
- if (!ent->err_mask)
- return NULL;
- return ent;
+ memset(ering, 0, sizeof(*ering));
}
static int ata_ering_map(struct ata_ering *ering,
@@ -1159,87 +1162,99 @@ static unsigned int ata_eh_analyze_tf(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc,
return action;
}
-static int ata_eh_categorize_ering_entry(struct ata_ering_entry *ent)
+static int ata_eh_categorize_error(int is_io, unsigned int err_mask)
{
- if (ent->err_mask & (AC_ERR_ATA_BUS | AC_ERR_TIMEOUT))
+ if (err_mask & AC_ERR_ATA_BUS)
return 1;
- if (ent->is_io) {
- if (ent->err_mask & AC_ERR_HSM)
- return 1;
- if ((ent->err_mask &
- (AC_ERR_DEV|AC_ERR_MEDIA|AC_ERR_INVALID)) == AC_ERR_DEV)
+ if (err_mask & AC_ERR_TIMEOUT)
+ return 2;
+
+ if (is_io) {
+ if (err_mask & AC_ERR_HSM)
return 2;
+ if ((err_mask &
+ (AC_ERR_DEV|AC_ERR_MEDIA|AC_ERR_INVALID)) == AC_ERR_DEV)
+ return 3;
}
return 0;
}
-struct speed_down_needed_arg {
+struct speed_down_verdict_arg {
u64 since;
- int nr_errors[3];
+ int nr_errors[4];
};
-static int speed_down_needed_cb(struct ata_ering_entry *ent, void *void_arg)
+static int speed_down_verdict_cb(struct ata_ering_entry *ent, void *void_arg)
{
- struct speed_down_needed_arg *arg = void_arg;
+ struct speed_down_verdict_arg *arg = void_arg;
+ int cat = ata_eh_categorize_error(ent->is_io, ent->err_mask);
if (ent->timestamp < arg->since)
return -1;
- arg->nr_errors[ata_eh_categorize_ering_entry(ent)]++;
+ arg->nr_errors[cat]++;
return 0;
}
/**
- * ata_eh_speed_down_needed - Determine wheter speed down is necessary
+ * ata_eh_speed_down_verdict - Determine speed down verdict
* @dev: Device of interest
*
* This function examines error ring of @dev and determines
- * whether speed down is necessary. Speed down is necessary if
- * there have been more than 3 of Cat-1 errors or 10 of Cat-2
- * errors during last 15 minutes.
+ * whether NCQ needs to be turned off, transfer speed should be
+ * stepped down, or falling back to PIO is necessary.
+ *
+ * Cat-1 is ATA_BUS error for any command.
*
- * Cat-1 errors are ATA_BUS, TIMEOUT for any command and HSM
- * violation for known supported commands.
+ * Cat-2 is TIMEOUT for any command or HSM violation for known
+ * supported commands.
*
- * Cat-2 errors are unclassified DEV error for known supported
+ * Cat-3 is is unclassified DEV error for known supported
* command.
*
+ * NCQ needs to be turned off if there have been more than 3
+ * Cat-2 + Cat-3 errors during last 10 minutes.
+ *
+ * Speed down is necessary if there have been more than 3 Cat-1 +
+ * Cat-2 errors or 10 Cat-3 errors during last 10 minutes.
+ *
+ * Falling back to PIO mode is necessary if there have been more
+ * than 10 Cat-1 + Cat-2 + Cat-3 errors during last 5 minutes.
+ *
* LOCKING:
* Inherited from caller.
*
* RETURNS:
- * 1 if speed down is necessary, 0 otherwise
+ * OR of ATA_EH_SPDN_* flags.
*/
-static int ata_eh_speed_down_needed(struct ata_device *dev)
+static unsigned int ata_eh_speed_down_verdict(struct ata_device *dev)
{
- const u64 interval = 15LLU * 60 * HZ;
- static const int err_limits[3] = { -1, 3, 10 };
- struct speed_down_needed_arg arg;
- struct ata_ering_entry *ent;
- int err_cat;
- u64 j64;
+ const u64 j5mins = 5LLU * 60 * HZ, j10mins = 10LLU * 60 * HZ;
+ u64 j64 = get_jiffies_64();
+ struct speed_down_verdict_arg arg;
+ unsigned int verdict = 0;
- ent = ata_ering_top(&dev->ering);
- if (!ent)
- return 0;
+ /* scan past 10 mins of error history */
+ memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
+ arg.since = j64 - min(j64, j10mins);
+ ata_ering_map(&dev->ering, speed_down_verdict_cb, &arg);
- err_cat = ata_eh_categorize_ering_entry(ent);
- if (err_cat == 0)
- return 0;
+ if (arg.nr_errors[2] + arg.nr_errors[3] > 3)
+ verdict |= ATA_EH_SPDN_NCQ_OFF;
+ if (arg.nr_errors[1] + arg.nr_errors[2] > 3 || arg.nr_errors[3] > 10)
+ verdict |= ATA_EH_SPDN_SPEED_DOWN;
+ /* scan past 3 mins of error history */
memset(&arg, 0, sizeof(arg));
+ arg.since = j64 - min(j64, j5mins);
+ ata_ering_map(&dev->ering, speed_down_verdict_cb, &arg);
- j64 = get_jiffies_64();
- if (j64 >= interval)
- arg.since = j64 - interval;
- else
- arg.since = 0;
-
- ata_ering_map(&dev->ering, speed_down_needed_cb, &arg);
+ if (arg.nr_errors[1] + arg.nr_errors[2] + arg.nr_errors[3] > 10)
+ verdict |= ATA_EH_SPDN_FALLBACK_TO_PIO;
- return arg.nr_errors[err_cat] > err_limits[err_cat];
+ return verdict;
}
/**
@@ -1257,31 +1272,80 @@ static int ata_eh_speed_down_needed(struct ata_device *dev)
* Kernel thread context (may sleep).
*
* RETURNS:
- * 0 on success, -errno otherwise
+ * Determined recovery action.
*/
-static int ata_eh_speed_down(struct ata_device *dev, int is_io,
- unsigned int err_mask)
+static unsigned int ata_eh_speed_down(struct ata_device *dev, int is_io,
+ unsigned int err_mask)
{
- if (!err_mask)
+ unsigned int verdict;
+ unsigned int action = 0;
+
+ /* don't bother if Cat-0 error */
+ if (ata_eh_categorize_error(is_io, err_mask) == 0)
return 0;
/* record error and determine whether speed down is necessary */
ata_ering_record(&dev->ering, is_io, err_mask);
+ verdict = ata_eh_speed_down_verdict(dev);
- if (!ata_eh_speed_down_needed(dev))
- return 0;
+ /* turn off NCQ? */
+ if ((verdict & ATA_EH_SPDN_NCQ_OFF) &&
+ (dev->flags & (ATA_DFLAG_PIO | ATA_DFLAG_NCQ |
+ ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_OFF)) == ATA_DFLAG_NCQ) {
+ dev->flags |= ATA_DFLAG_NCQ_OFF;
+ ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_WARNING,
+ "NCQ disabled due to excessive errors\n");
+ goto done;
+ }
+
+ /* speed down? */
+ if (verdict & ATA_EH_SPDN_SPEED_DOWN) {
+ /* speed down SATA link speed if possible */
+ if (sata_down_spd_limit(dev->ap) == 0) {
+ action |= ATA_EH_HARDRESET;
+ goto done;
+ }
- /* speed down SATA link speed if possible */
- if (sata_down_spd_limit(dev->ap) == 0)
- return ATA_EH_HARDRESET;
+ /* lower transfer mode */
+ if (dev->spdn_cnt < 2) {
+ static const int dma_dnxfer_sel[] =
+ { ATA_DNXFER_DMA, ATA_DNXFER_40C };
+ static const int pio_dnxfer_sel[] =
+ { ATA_DNXFER_PIO, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 };
+ int sel;
- /* lower transfer mode */
- if (ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_ANY) == 0)
- return ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
+ if (dev->xfer_shift != ATA_SHIFT_PIO)
+ sel = dma_dnxfer_sel[dev->spdn_cnt];
+ else
+ sel = pio_dnxfer_sel[dev->spdn_cnt];
+
+ dev->spdn_cnt++;
+
+ if (ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, sel) == 0) {
+ action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Fall back to PIO? Slowing down to PIO is meaningless for
+ * SATA. Consider it only for PATA.
+ */
+ if ((verdict & ATA_EH_SPDN_FALLBACK_TO_PIO) && (dev->spdn_cnt >= 2) &&
+ (dev->ap->cbl != ATA_CBL_SATA) &&
+ (dev->xfer_shift != ATA_SHIFT_PIO)) {
+ if (ata_down_xfermask_limit(dev, ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO) == 0) {
+ dev->spdn_cnt = 0;
+ action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
+ goto done;
+ }
+ }
- ata_dev_printk(dev, KERN_ERR,
- "speed down requested but no transfer mode left\n");
return 0;
+ done:
+ /* device has been slowed down, blow error history */
+ ata_ering_clear(&dev->ering);
+ return action;
}
/**
diff --git a/include/linux/libata.h b/include/linux/libata.h
index 4c3ed59..1b3963f 100644
--- a/include/linux/libata.h
+++ b/include/linux/libata.h
@@ -495,6 +495,7 @@ struct ata_device {
/* error history */
struct ata_ering ering;
+ int spdn_cnt;
unsigned int horkage; /* List of broken features */
};
--
1.4.4.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Subject is [PATCH,RESEND] libata: put some intelligence into speed down sequence
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] libata: kill ATA_DNXFER_ANY Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 7:24 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 16:59 ` asdf Ric Wheeler
6 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-02 7:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jeff; +Cc: alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide
Sorry, bad script day.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: asdf
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2007-02-02 7:24 ` Subject is [PATCH,RESEND] libata: put some intelligence into speed down sequence Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-02 16:59 ` Ric Wheeler
2007-02-03 4:07 ` asdf Tejun Heo
6 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Ric Wheeler @ 2007-02-02 16:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: jeff, alan, edmudama, linux-ide, Mark Lord
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The current EH speed down code is more of a feature demonstration and
> goes through rdiculously many meaningless steps when condition is met.
> This patchset tries to put some intelligence into speed down sequence.
> The goal is to achieve reasonable number of speed down steps
> reasonably spaced from one another and consider NCQ, cable type and
> the current protocol when determining speed down steps, while not
> bloating the code too much with nitty gritty details.
>
> Roughly, the rules are...
>
> 1. If NCQ and protocol/timeout/unknown dev errors occur, turn off NCQ
>
> 2. If excessive transfer errors occur, speed down within the current
> transfer mode (UDMA/MWDMA/PIO). If UDMA, it's first adjusted down
> a step, if error conditions persist, 40c limit is applied. Speed
> down is done only twice.
>
> 3. If PATA && used up all DMA speed down steps && a LOT of
> transmission/unknown errors occur, switch to PIO. So, we never
> automatically step down to PIO on SATA. This is intended. Some
> SATA hdd even seems to have problem with PIO data transfer
> commands.
>
> The last patch makes ahci report HSM violation error on spurious
> completion of NCQ commands, thus causing NCQ off after several such
> incidents. These drives should be blacklisted for DMA eventually.
>
> This patchset is against...
>
> upstream (eb0e63cca36a3389f0ccab4584f6d479b983fad5)
> + [1] pata_platform-fix-devres-conversion
> + [2] libata-convert-to-iomap
>
> Ric, I guess this resolves the to-do item from you which has been
> sitting in my mailbox for way too long. What do you think about the
> rules?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
Thanks, this looks great!
The key here is making sure that we get a really good classification of
error types and don't go down the step down path when the error does not
indicate that the drive got the command and just correctly failed it.
(That behavior, which we hit with one specific issues earlier & you have
already fixed, reminds me of the American tourist abroad syndrome. If
someone does not understand what you asked in English, just say it again
slower and louder until they get it ;-)).
We might still want/need to be able to "lock" specific drives so that
they do not drop out of DMA mode, not as the default but as a system
tuning issue. What we see in the set of ATA drives that we have in the
field is that dropping out of DMA mode is basically useless (for us at
least) since it is so slow and we always have other drives to fall back
on. Clearly not the case for typical end users, but a common case in the
storage space where we pack as many disk drives into each box as we can.
On that other thread, I mentioned that we need to get some good testing
done with this kind of thing. With Mark's error injection fixes (or the
new ATA spec'ed ability to inject errors that Doug mentioned), along
with our population of real world flaky drives, I hope to be able to
beat on this in a realistic way in our labs,
ric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: asdf
2007-02-02 16:59 ` asdf Ric Wheeler
@ 2007-02-03 4:07 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-03 4:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ric Wheeler; +Cc: jeff, alan, edmudama, linux-ide, Mark Lord
Ric Wheeler wrote:
[--snip--]
> We might still want/need to be able to "lock" specific drives so that
> they do not drop out of DMA mode, not as the default but as a system
> tuning issue. What we see in the set of ATA drives that we have in the
> field is that dropping out of DMA mode is basically useless (for us at
> least) since it is so slow and we always have other drives to fall back
> on. Clearly not the case for typical end users, but a common case in the
> storage space where we pack as many disk drives into each box as we can.
I agree that some tuning knobs can be useful. SATA drives now never
drops to PIO mode due to errors. Even PATA drives should be failing
really hard to get degraded into PIO mode.
> On that other thread, I mentioned that we need to get some good testing
> done with this kind of thing. With Mark's error injection fixes (or the
> new ATA spec'ed ability to inject errors that Doug mentioned), along
> with our population of real world flaky drives, I hope to be able to
> beat on this in a realistic way in our labs,
Yeap, really. Things are pretty easy to adjust. With all the posted
patches applied...
* Errors are categorized by ata_eh_categorize_error() considering
whether the failed request was regular IO operation and the err_mask.
* ata_eh_speed_down_verdict() scans error history and determines
verdicts (or'd bitmask of ATA_EH_SPDN_* flags).
* ata_eh_speed_down() tries to apply the verdict. It always prefers the
least severe verdict and once a verdict is applied all others are
ignored and error history is cleared.
So, the basic tuning point is ata_eh_speed_down_verdict(). It's a very
short and easy-to-tune function which determines for how far back the
error history is scanned and which categories of errors trigger which
verdict.
Experimenting in realistic setup and reporting how the current setting
works and how better can it be adjusted will be a huge help.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit()
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-02-20 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Make ata_down_xfermask_limit() accept @sel instead of @force_pio0.
> @sel selects how the xfermask limit will be adjusted. The following
> selectors are defined.
>
> * ATA_DNXFER_PIO : only speed down PIO
> * ATA_DNXFER_DMA : only speed down DMA, don't cause transfer mode change
> * ATA_DNXFER_40C : apply 40c cable limit
> * ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO : force PIO
> * ATA_DNXFER_FORCE_PIO0 : force PIO0 (same as original with @force_pio0 == 1)
> * ATA_DNXFER_ANY : same as original with @force_pio0 == 0
>
> Currently, only ANY and FORCE_PIO0 are used to maintain the original
> behavior. Other selectors will be used later to improve EH speed down
> sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 9 +++-
> drivers/ata/libata.h | 12 +++++-
> 3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
applied 1-4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-21 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated) Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-02-20 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide
Tejun Heo wrote:
> SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions is a clear protocol
> violation. Currently, only some Maxtors with early firmware revisions
> are showing this problem. Those firmwares have other NCQ related
> problems including buggy NCQ error reporting and occasional lock up
> after NCQ errors.
>
> Consider spurious NCQ completions HSM violation and freeze the port
> after it. EH will turn off NCQ after this happens several times.
> Eventually drives which show this behavior should be blacklisted for
> NCQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
ACK, but patch does not apply to current #upstream
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated)
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2007-02-21 7:34 ` Tejun Heo
2007-02-23 10:37 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2007-02-21 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Garzik; +Cc: alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide
SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions is a clear protocol
violation. Currently, only some Maxtors with early firmware revisions
are showing this problem. Those firmwares have other NCQ related
problems including buggy NCQ error reporting and occasional lock up
after NCQ errors.
Consider spurious NCQ completions HSM violation and freeze the port
after it. EH will turn off NCQ after this happens several times.
Eventually drives which show this behavior should be blacklisted for
NCQ.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
---
Regenerated against the current #upstream
(b216f3f887bb3e73808250841035a6fc4f6fc9e0).
Thanks.
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 6a3543e..334f54c 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -198,7 +198,6 @@ struct ahci_port_priv {
void *rx_fis;
dma_addr_t rx_fis_dma;
/* for NCQ spurious interrupt analysis */
- int ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt;
unsigned int ncq_saw_d2h:1;
unsigned int ncq_saw_dmas:1;
};
@@ -1160,23 +1159,24 @@ static void ahci_host_intr(struct ata_port *ap)
known_irq = 1;
}
- if (status & PORT_IRQ_SDB_FIS &&
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt < 10) {
+ if (status & PORT_IRQ_SDB_FIS) {
/* SDB FIS containing spurious completions might be
- * dangerous, we need to know more about them. Print
- * more of it.
- */
+ * dangerous, whine and fail commands with HSM
+ * violation. EH will turn off NCQ after several such
+ * failures.
+ */
const __le32 *f = pp->rx_fis + RX_FIS_SDB;
- ata_port_printk(ap, KERN_INFO, "Spurious SDB FIS during NCQ "
- "issue=0x%x SAct=0x%x FIS=%08x:%08x%s\n",
- readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE),
- readl(port_mmio + PORT_SCR_ACT),
- le32_to_cpu(f[0]), le32_to_cpu(f[1]),
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt < 10 ?
- "" : ", shutting up");
+ ata_ehi_push_desc(ehi, "spurious completion during NCQ "
+ "issue=0x%x SAct=0x%x FIS=%08x:%08x",
+ readl(port_mmio + PORT_CMD_ISSUE),
+ readl(port_mmio + PORT_SCR_ACT),
+ le32_to_cpu(f[0]), le32_to_cpu(f[1]));
+
+ ehi->err_mask |= AC_ERR_HSM;
+ ehi->action |= ATA_EH_SOFTRESET;
+ ata_port_freeze(ap);
- pp->ncq_saw_spurious_sdb_cnt++;
known_irq = 1;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated)
2007-02-21 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated) Tejun Heo
@ 2007-02-23 10:37 ` Jeff Garzik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2007-02-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tejun Heo; +Cc: alan, ric, edmudama, linux-ide
Tejun Heo wrote:
> SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions is a clear protocol
> violation. Currently, only some Maxtors with early firmware revisions
> are showing this problem. Those firmwares have other NCQ related
> problems including buggy NCQ error reporting and occasional lock up
> after NCQ errors.
>
> Consider spurious NCQ completions HSM violation and freeze the port
> after it. EH will turn off NCQ after this happens several times.
> Eventually drives which show this behavior should be blacklisted for
> NCQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
> ---
> Regenerated against the current #upstream
> (b216f3f887bb3e73808250841035a6fc4f6fc9e0).
applied
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2011-04-28 12:20 Alexander Simon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Simon @ 2011-04-28 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-wireless
subscribe linux-wireless
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2011-12-06 8:08 Dan Carpenter
2011-12-06 8:48 ` asdf Kyungmin Park
0 siblings, 1 reply; 24+ messages in thread
From: Dan Carpenter @ 2011-12-06 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kyungmin Park, Adrian Hunter; +Cc: linux-mmc
There is a new gcc warning in this function:
drivers/mmc/card/block.c:836:18: warning: ‘arg’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
810 /* The sanitize operation is supported at v4.5 only */
811 if (mmc_can_sanitize(card)) {
812 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
813 EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
1) arg is uninitialized here. mmc_switch() can return -EIO.
814 goto out;
815 }
816
817 from = blk_rq_pos(req);
818 nr = blk_rq_sectors(req);
819
820 if (mmc_can_trim(card) && !mmc_erase_group_aligned(card, from, nr))
821 arg = MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG;
822 else
823 arg = MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG;
824 retry:
825 if (card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38) {
826 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
827 INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD,
828 arg == MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG ?
^^^
3) uninitialized.
829 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM1 :
830 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECERASE,
831 0);
832 if (err)
833 goto out;
834 }
835 err = mmc_erase(card, from, nr, arg);
836 if (!err && arg == MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG) {
837 if (card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38) {
838 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
839 INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD,
840 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM2,
841 0);
842 if (err)
843 goto out;
844 }
845 err = mmc_erase(card, from, nr, MMC_SECURE_TRIM2_ARG);
846 }
847 out:
848 if (err == -EIO && !mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type))
849 goto retry;
2) We could maybe hit the goto retry here if the reset works.
regards,
dan carpenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: asdf
2011-12-06 8:08 asdf Dan Carpenter
@ 2011-12-06 8:48 ` Kyungmin Park
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Kyungmin Park @ 2011-12-06 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dan Carpenter; +Cc: Adrian Hunter, linux-mmc
Hi
Yes possible scenario, it should be changed like this.
out:
if (err == -EIO) {
int ret = !mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type);
if (ret && !mmc_can_sanitize(card))
goto retry;
}
anyway, I will find the more fancy way.
Thank you for pointing out.
BR,
Kyungmin Park
On 12/6/11, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> There is a new gcc warning in this function:
>
> drivers/mmc/card/block.c:836:18: warning: ‘arg’ may be used uninitialized in
> this function [-Wuninitialized]
>
> 810 /* The sanitize operation is supported at v4.5 only */
> 811 if (mmc_can_sanitize(card)) {
> 812 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> 813 EXT_CSD_SANITIZE_START, 1, 0);
>
> 1) arg is uninitialized here. mmc_switch() can return -EIO.
>
> 814 goto out;
> 815 }
> 816
> 817 from = blk_rq_pos(req);
> 818 nr = blk_rq_sectors(req);
> 819
> 820 if (mmc_can_trim(card) && !mmc_erase_group_aligned(card,
> from, nr))
> 821 arg = MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG;
> 822 else
> 823 arg = MMC_SECURE_ERASE_ARG;
> 824 retry:
> 825 if (card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38) {
> 826 err = mmc_switch(card, EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> 827 INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD,
> 828 arg == MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG ?
> ^^^
>
> 3) uninitialized.
>
> 829 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM1 :
> 830 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECERASE,
> 831 0);
> 832 if (err)
> 833 goto out;
> 834 }
> 835 err = mmc_erase(card, from, nr, arg);
> 836 if (!err && arg == MMC_SECURE_TRIM1_ARG) {
> 837 if (card->quirks & MMC_QUIRK_INAND_CMD38) {
> 838 err = mmc_switch(card,
> EXT_CSD_CMD_SET_NORMAL,
> 839 INAND_CMD38_ARG_EXT_CSD,
> 840 INAND_CMD38_ARG_SECTRIM2,
> 841 0);
> 842 if (err)
> 843 goto out;
> 844 }
> 845 err = mmc_erase(card, from, nr,
> MMC_SECURE_TRIM2_ARG);
> 846 }
> 847 out:
> 848 if (err == -EIO && !mmc_blk_reset(md, card->host, type))
> 849 goto retry;
>
> 2) We could maybe hit the goto retry here if the reset works.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-mmc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2023-03-31 10:04 Christian Brauner
2023-04-21 18:52 ` asdf Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-21 18:58 ` asdf Kernel.org Bugbot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Christian Brauner @ 2023-03-31 10:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev; +Cc: Tools
Hey Konstantin,
Can't be said enough: thanks for b4!
I have two inquiries about b4 send:
(1) Currently the message id that is generated for each patch sent by b4
has the format:
[date] - [branch name] - [version] - [patch number] - [random] @ kernel.org
where [date] is fixed and is taken from the change-id of the series
as you mentioned in a fediverse thread.
It would be nice if we could - potentially opt-in via a config opt -
set [date] to the date when the patch series was sent.
(2) I couldn't find an option to tell b4 send to set In-Reply-To: to one
or more messages. That comes in handy when e.g., generating a patch
in reply to syzbot report.
Maybe that's something worth adding.
Thanks!
Christian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: asdf
2023-03-31 10:04 asdf Christian Brauner
@ 2023-04-21 18:52 ` Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-21 18:58 ` asdf Kernel.org Bugbot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev @ 2023-04-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christian Brauner; +Cc: Tools
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 12:04:14PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Can't be said enough: thanks for b4!
Glad to see so many people start to use it.
> I have two inquiries about b4 send:
>
> (1) Currently the message id that is generated for each patch sent by b4
> has the format:
>
> [date] - [branch name] - [version] - [patch number] - [random] @ kernel.org
>
> where [date] is fixed and is taken from the change-id of the series
> as you mentioned in a fediverse thread.
>
> It would be nice if we could - potentially opt-in via a config opt -
> set [date] to the date when the patch series was sent.
Sounds reasonable.
bugbot on
> (2) I couldn't find an option to tell b4 send to set In-Reply-To: to one
> or more messages. That comes in handy when e.g., generating a patch
> in reply to syzbot report.
>
> Maybe that's something worth adding.
I worry that this can create really weird thread interactions. E.g. if you
have a bot report and it results in two different series being proposed:
original bot report
\
-- [PATCH] fixes one issue from the report
\
| -- [PATCH v2] fixes one issue from the report
|
-- [PATCH] fixes a different issue from the report
\
-- [PATCH v2] fixes a different issue from the report
This will confuse absolutely everyone, not just b4. :)
It's best to just use Link:, I think.
-K
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* Re: asdf
2023-03-31 10:04 asdf Christian Brauner
2023-04-21 18:52 ` asdf Konstantin Ryabitsev
@ 2023-04-21 18:58 ` Kernel.org Bugbot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: Kernel.org Bugbot @ 2023-04-21 18:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: brauner, tools, konstantin
Hello:
This conversation is now tracked by Kernel.org Bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217359
There is no need to do anything else, just keep talking.
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
Kernel.org Bugzilla (peebz 0.1)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
* asdf
@ 2024-04-15 0:39 임준수(Junesoo Im) 수석 두산로보틱스
0 siblings, 0 replies; 24+ messages in thread
From: 임준수(Junesoo Im) 수석 두산로보틱스 @ 2024-04-15 0:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xenomai@lists.linux.dev
Cc: 박경훈(Kyunghoon Park) 팀장 두산로보틱스
hello. I am a Linux Application Developer.
Application uses Xenomai 3.1x.
The machine environment is 64bit and kernel 5.4.255.
Repeat machine reboot at 55 second intervals.
Most of the time it works fine, but sometimes the system freezes.
The mouse doesn't move and the keyboard doesn't work.
The screen also freezes.
There are no special messages in the kernel log.
The same goes for syslog.
So I'm running some tests.
If you test without running the application, there is no problem with the system.
Problems occur when the application runs.
However, I don't see any special messages in the application log.
I haven't found the cause of Freezing yet.
I am currently viewing the “https://v3.xenomai.org/troubleshooting/” site.
I would like to test some of the things mentioned on this site.
If possible, I would like you to look at this site together.
This site is talking about Kernel configuration that needs to be removed.
"CONFIG_KGDB"
This option is currently enabled, so I removed it and tested it.
But Freezing occurred.
A problem has occurred, but should this option be removed?
This site talks about "Freeze or machine lockup".
1. “Stack space overflow issue now biting sim real-time kernel thread?”
2. “Spurious delay/timeout values computed by the application (specifically: too short)”
3. “A case of freeze is a system call called in a loop which fails without its return value being properly checked.”
There are three explanations: I have a question about the first one.
How many threads can the xenomai program create?
What is the maximum stack size per thread in the xenomai program?
Our program has at least 22 xenomai threads.
The stack size is different for each thread. It may have a maximum of 8 MB and a minimum of 2 MB.
The question is complicated and long, but I desperately need help.
Please, reply.
Thank you.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 24+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-15 0:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-02 7:22 asdf Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] libata: improve ata_down_xfermask_limit() Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] libata: improve probe failure handling Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] libata: put some intelligence into EH speed down sequence Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation Tejun Heo
2007-02-20 15:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-21 7:34 ` [PATCH 5/5] ahci: consider SDB FIS containing spurious NCQ completions HSM violation (regenerated) Tejun Heo
2007-02-23 10:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-02-02 7:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] libata: kill ATA_DNXFER_ANY Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 7:24 ` Subject is [PATCH,RESEND] libata: put some intelligence into speed down sequence Tejun Heo
2007-02-02 16:59 ` asdf Ric Wheeler
2007-02-03 4:07 ` asdf Tejun Heo
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2024-04-15 0:39 asdf 임준수(Junesoo Im) 수석 두산로보틱스
2023-03-31 10:04 asdf Christian Brauner
2023-04-21 18:52 ` asdf Konstantin Ryabitsev
2023-04-21 18:58 ` asdf Kernel.org Bugbot
2011-12-06 8:08 asdf Dan Carpenter
2011-12-06 8:48 ` asdf Kyungmin Park
2011-04-28 12:20 asdf Alexander Simon
2006-07-06 10:15 asdf Horms
2004-03-02 21:48 asdf Jonathan
2004-03-02 19:15 asdf Jonathan
2001-10-11 10:53 asdf thunder7
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.