All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>,
	cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D4FBB0.7090109@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702151537.51202.arnd@arndb.de>

Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:52, Carl Love wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>>--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig	2007-01-18 16:43:14.000000000 -0600
>>+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig	2007-02-13 19:04:46.271028904 -0600
>>@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
>> 
>> config OPROFILE
>> 	tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>-	depends on PROFILING
>>+	default m
>>+	depends on SPU_FS && PROFILING
>> 	help
>> 	  OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
>> 	  whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
>>    
>>
>
>Milton already commented on this being wrong. I think what you want
>is
>	depends on PROFILING && (SPU_FS = n || SPU_FS)
>
>that should make sure that when SPU_FS=y that OPROFILE can not be 'm'.
>  
>
The above suggestion would not work if SPU_FS is not defined, since the 
entire config option is ignored if an undefined symbol is used.  So, 
here's what I propose instead: 
    - Leave the existing 'config OPROFILE' unchanged from its current 
form in mainline (shown below)
    - Add the new 'config OPROFILE_CELL' (shown below)
    - In arch/powerpc/configs/cell-defconfig, set CONFIG_OPROFILE=m, to 
correspond to setting for CONFIG_SPU_FS
    - In arch/powerpc/oprofile/Makefile, do the following:
                oprofile-$(CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL) += op_model_cell.o \
                                                            
cell/spu_profiler.o cell/vma_map.o cell/spu_task_sync.o

===========
config OPROFILE
        tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on PROFILING
        help
          OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
          whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
          and applications.

          If unsure, say N.

config OPROFILE_CELL
        bool "OProfile for Cell Broadband Engine"
        depends on OPROFILE && SPU_FS
        default y if ((SPU_FS = y && OPROFILE = y) || (SPU_FS = m && 
OPROFILE = m))
        help
          Profiling of Cell BE SPUs requires special support enabled
          by this option.  Both SPU_FS and OPROFILE options must be
          set 'y' or both be set 'm'.
=============

Can anyone see a problem with any of this . . . or perhaps a suggestion 
of a better way?

Thanks.

-Maynard

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Carl Love <cel@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 18:32:48 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <45D4FBB0.7090109@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702151537.51202.arnd@arndb.de>

Arnd Bergmann wrote:

>On Thursday 15 February 2007 00:52, Carl Love wrote:
>
>
>  
>
>>--- linux-2.6.20-rc1.orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig	2007-01-18 16:43:14.000000000 -0600
>>+++ linux-2.6.20-rc1/arch/powerpc/oprofile/Kconfig	2007-02-13 19:04:46.271028904 -0600
>>@@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
>> 
>> config OPROFILE
>> 	tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)"
>>-	depends on PROFILING
>>+	default m
>>+	depends on SPU_FS && PROFILING
>> 	help
>> 	  OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
>> 	  whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
>>    
>>
>
>Milton already commented on this being wrong. I think what you want
>is
>	depends on PROFILING && (SPU_FS = n || SPU_FS)
>
>that should make sure that when SPU_FS=y that OPROFILE can not be 'm'.
>  
>
The above suggestion would not work if SPU_FS is not defined, since the 
entire config option is ignored if an undefined symbol is used.  So, 
here's what I propose instead: 
    - Leave the existing 'config OPROFILE' unchanged from its current 
form in mainline (shown below)
    - Add the new 'config OPROFILE_CELL' (shown below)
    - In arch/powerpc/configs/cell-defconfig, set CONFIG_OPROFILE=m, to 
correspond to setting for CONFIG_SPU_FS
    - In arch/powerpc/oprofile/Makefile, do the following:
                oprofile-$(CONFIG_OPROFILE_CELL) += op_model_cell.o \
                                                            
cell/spu_profiler.o cell/vma_map.o cell/spu_task_sync.o

===========
config OPROFILE
        tristate "OProfile system profiling (EXPERIMENTAL)"
        depends on PROFILING
        help
          OProfile is a profiling system capable of profiling the
          whole system, include the kernel, kernel modules, libraries,
          and applications.

          If unsure, say N.

config OPROFILE_CELL
        bool "OProfile for Cell Broadband Engine"
        depends on OPROFILE && SPU_FS
        default y if ((SPU_FS = y && OPROFILE = y) || (SPU_FS = m && 
OPROFILE = m))
        help
          Profiling of Cell BE SPUs requires special support enabled
          by this option.  Both SPU_FS and OPROFILE options must be
          set 'y' or both be set 'm'.
=============

Can anyone see a problem with any of this . . . or perhaps a suggestion 
of a better way?

Thanks.

-Maynard


  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-02-16  0:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-14 23:52 [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch Carl Love
2007-02-15 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 14:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 16:15   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 16:15     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 18:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 18:13       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 20:21   ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 20:21     ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 21:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:50     ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-15 21:50       ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-16  0:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16  0:33         ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16  0:32   ` Maynard Johnson [this message]
2007-02-16  0:32     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 17:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 17:14       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 21:43       ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 21:43         ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18         ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18           ` Maynard Johnson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-22  0:02 Carl Love
2007-02-26 23:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-26 23:50   ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-27  1:31   ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27  1:31     ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27 16:52   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-27 16:52     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-28  1:44     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-28  1:44       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-06  0:28 [RFC,PATCH] CELL PPU " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02   ` Carl Love
2007-02-07 15:41   ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 15:41     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 22:48     ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-07 22:48       ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-08 15:03       ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 15:03         ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 14:18   ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 14:18     ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 17:21     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 17:21       ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 18:01       ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 18:01         ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 22:51       ` Carl Love
2007-02-08 22:51         ` Carl Love
2007-02-09  2:46         ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09  2:46           ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 16:17           ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 16:17             ` Carl Love
2007-02-11 22:46             ` Milton Miller
2007-02-11 22:46               ` Milton Miller
2007-02-12 16:38               ` Carl Love
2007-02-12 16:38                 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 18:47       ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 18:47         ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:10         ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:10           ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:46           ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:46             ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 23:59     ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 23:59       ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-09 18:03       ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 18:03         ` Milton Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=45D4FBB0.7090109@us.ibm.com \
    --to=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=cel@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.