From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
Mike Perks <mperks@us.ibm.com>,
oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:52:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E461D4.6050807@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702270051.00393.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1279 bytes --]
I have applied the "cleanup" patch that Arnd sent, but had to fix up a
few things:
- Bug fix: Initialize retval in spu_task_sync.c, line 95, otherwise
OProfile this function returns non-zero and OProfile fails.
- Remove unused codes in include/linux/oprofile.h
- Compile warnings: Initialize offset and spu_cookie at lines 283
and 284 in spu_task_sync.c
With these changes and some userspace changes that were necessary to
correspond with Arnd's changes, our testing was successful.
A fixup patch is attached.
P.S. We have a single patch with all these changes applied if anyone
would like us to post it.
-Maynard
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Thursday 22 February 2007, Carl Love wrote:
>
>
>>This patch updates the existing arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
>>to add in the SPU profiling capabilities. In addition, a 'cell' subdirectory
>>was added to arch/powerpc/oprofile to hold Cell-specific SPU profiling
>>code.
>>
>>
>
>There was a significant amount of whitespace breakage in this patch,
>which I cleaned up. The patch below consists of the other things
>I changed as a further cleanup. Note that I changed the format
>of the context switch record, which I found too complicated, as
>I described on IRC last week.
>
> Arnd <><
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: fixups-to-arnd-oprof_spu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1416 bytes --]
diff -paur linux-orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c linux-new/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c
--- linux-orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c 2007-02-27 17:10:24.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-new/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c 2007-02-27 17:08:57.000000000 -0600
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ prepare_cached_spu_info(struct spu * spu
{
unsigned long flags;
struct vma_to_fileoffset_map * new_map;
- int retval;
+ int retval = 0;
struct cached_info * info;
/* We won't bother getting cache_lock here since
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static int process_context_switch(struct
{
unsigned long flags;
int retval;
- unsigned int offset;
- unsigned long spu_cookie, app_dcookie;
+ unsigned int offset = 0;
+ unsigned long spu_cookie = 0, app_dcookie;
retval = prepare_cached_spu_info(spu, objectId);
if (retval)
goto out;
diff -paur linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h
--- linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h 2007-02-27 14:41:29.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h 2007-02-27 14:43:18.000000000 -0600
@@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
#define XEN_ENTER_SWITCH_CODE 10
#define SPU_PROFILING_CODE 11
#define SPU_CTX_SWITCH_CODE 12
-#define SPU_OFFSET_CODE 13
-#define SPU_COOKIE_CODE 14
-#define SPU_SHLIB_COOKIE_CODE 15
struct super_block;
struct dentry;
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maynard Johnson <maynardj@us.ibm.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net,
Gerhard Stenzel <gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com>,
Mike Perks <mperks@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 10:52:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45E461D4.6050807@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200702270051.00393.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1279 bytes --]
I have applied the "cleanup" patch that Arnd sent, but had to fix up a
few things:
- Bug fix: Initialize retval in spu_task_sync.c, line 95, otherwise
OProfile this function returns non-zero and OProfile fails.
- Remove unused codes in include/linux/oprofile.h
- Compile warnings: Initialize offset and spu_cookie at lines 283
and 284 in spu_task_sync.c
With these changes and some userspace changes that were necessary to
correspond with Arnd's changes, our testing was successful.
A fixup patch is attached.
P.S. We have a single patch with all these changes applied if anyone
would like us to post it.
-Maynard
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>On Thursday 22 February 2007, Carl Love wrote:
>
>
>>This patch updates the existing arch/powerpc/oprofile/op_model_cell.c
>>to add in the SPU profiling capabilities. In addition, a 'cell' subdirectory
>>was added to arch/powerpc/oprofile to hold Cell-specific SPU profiling
>>code.
>>
>>
>
>There was a significant amount of whitespace breakage in this patch,
>which I cleaned up. The patch below consists of the other things
>I changed as a further cleanup. Note that I changed the format
>of the context switch record, which I found too complicated, as
>I described on IRC last week.
>
> Arnd <><
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: fixups-to-arnd-oprof_spu.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 1416 bytes --]
diff -paur linux-orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c linux-new/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c
--- linux-orig/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c 2007-02-27 17:10:24.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-new/arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_task_sync.c 2007-02-27 17:08:57.000000000 -0600
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ prepare_cached_spu_info(struct spu * spu
{
unsigned long flags;
struct vma_to_fileoffset_map * new_map;
- int retval;
+ int retval = 0;
struct cached_info * info;
/* We won't bother getting cache_lock here since
@@ -280,8 +280,8 @@ static int process_context_switch(struct
{
unsigned long flags;
int retval;
- unsigned int offset;
- unsigned long spu_cookie, app_dcookie;
+ unsigned int offset = 0;
+ unsigned long spu_cookie = 0, app_dcookie;
retval = prepare_cached_spu_info(spu, objectId);
if (retval)
goto out;
diff -paur linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h
--- linux-orig/include/linux/oprofile.h 2007-02-27 14:41:29.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-new/include/linux/oprofile.h 2007-02-27 14:43:18.000000000 -0600
@@ -36,9 +36,6 @@
#define XEN_ENTER_SWITCH_CODE 10
#define SPU_PROFILING_CODE 11
#define SPU_CTX_SWITCH_CODE 12
-#define SPU_OFFSET_CODE 13
-#define SPU_COOKIE_CODE 14
-#define SPU_SHLIB_COOKIE_CODE 15
struct super_block;
struct dentry;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-27 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-22 0:02 [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL Oprofile SPU profiling updated patch Carl Love
2007-02-26 23:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-26 23:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-27 1:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27 1:31 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-27 16:52 ` Maynard Johnson [this message]
2007-02-27 16:52 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-28 1:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-28 1:44 ` Arnd Bergmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-14 23:52 Carl Love
2007-02-15 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 14:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 16:15 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 16:15 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-15 18:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 18:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 20:21 ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 20:21 ` Carl Love
2007-02-15 21:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-15 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-15 21:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-02-16 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 0:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 0:32 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 0:32 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 17:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 17:14 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-16 21:43 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-16 21:43 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-18 23:18 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-06 0:28 [RFC,PATCH] CELL PPU " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [RFC, PATCH] CELL " Carl Love
2007-02-06 23:02 ` Carl Love
2007-02-07 15:41 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 15:41 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-07 22:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-07 22:48 ` Michael Ellerman
2007-02-08 15:03 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 15:03 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 14:18 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 14:18 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-08 18:01 ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 18:01 ` Adrian Reber
2007-02-08 22:51 ` Carl Love
2007-02-08 22:51 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 2:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 2:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 16:17 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 16:17 ` Carl Love
2007-02-11 22:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-11 22:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-12 16:38 ` Carl Love
2007-02-12 16:38 ` Carl Love
2007-02-09 18:47 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 18:47 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-02-09 19:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 19:46 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-08 23:59 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-08 23:59 ` Maynard Johnson
2007-02-09 18:03 ` Milton Miller
2007-02-09 18:03 ` Milton Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45E461D4.6050807@us.ibm.com \
--to=maynardj@us.ibm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=gerhard.stenzel@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=mperks@us.ibm.com \
--cc=oprofile-list@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.