fully virtualized vista

fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known issue.

K. Y

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Mats Petersson]

At 19:29 08/08/2007, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a 
>known issue.


Yes, it's been happening for a long time, and it appears to be a 
problem with the Vista driver for the RealTek 8139(?) network adapter 
and the compatibility with the QEMU implementation of 8139. Someone 
reported that Win2K3 driver can be made working, but I've not tested 
this myself.

--
Mats


>K. Y
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  2:37 PM, in message
<46ba0d8b.0269300a.7873.7a9b@mx.google.com>, Mats Petersson
<mats@planetcatfish.com> wrote: 
> At 19:29 08/08/2007, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>>I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a 
>>known issue.
> 
> 
> Yes, it's been happening for a long time, and it appears to be a 
> problem with the Vista driver for the RealTek 8139(?) network adapter 
> and the compatibility with the QEMU implementation of 8139. Someone 
> reported that Win2K3 driver can be made working, but I've not tested 
> this myself.
Thanks,

K. Y
> 
> --
> Mats
> 
> 
>>K. Y
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Xen-devel mailing list
>>Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Tim Deegan]

At 12:29 -0600 on 08 Aug (1186576152), Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known issue.

What issues are you having?  And what version of Xen?  32bit Vista's RX
path didn't work at all with the emulated rtl8139 before about three
weeks ago (cset 15596 of xen-unstable).

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xensource.com>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  2:39 PM, in message
<20070808183949.GA30474@york.uk.xensource.com>, Tim Deegan
<Tim.Deegan@xensource.com> wrote: 
> At 12:29 -0600 on 08 Aug (1186576152), Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known 
> issue.
> 
> What issues are you having?  And what version of Xen?  32bit Vista's RX
> path didn't work at all with the emulated rtl8139 before about three
> weeks ago (cset 15596 of xen-unstable).

I was trying on a 3.04 based system with a lot of post 3.04 features backported. Tim, is the problem fixed on cset 15596. Would you know which cset fixed the problem?

Thanks,

K. Y
> 
> Tim.

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Tim Deegan]

At 13:02 -0600 on 08 Aug (1186578168), Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> I was trying on a 3.04 based system with a lot of post 3.04 features backported. Tim, is the problem fixed on cset 15596. Would you know which cset fixed the problem?

Yes, 15596:d99903a98ad0 fixes the Vista issue.  You should probably take
15595 as well, which fixes an issue for older Windows versions.  They
should backport easily to older qemu-dm versions.

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xensource.com>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

Thanks Tim.

K. Y

>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  3:14 PM, in message
<20070808191432.GB30474@york.uk.xensource.com>, Tim Deegan
<Tim.Deegan@xensource.com> wrote: 
> At 13:02 -0600 on 08 Aug (1186578168), Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>> I was trying on a 3.04 based system with a lot of post 3.04 features 
> backported. Tim, is the problem fixed on cset 15596. Would you know which 
> cset fixed the problem?
> 
> Yes, 15596:d99903a98ad0 fixes the Vista issue.  You should probably take
> 15595 as well, which fixes an issue for older Windows versions.  They
> should backport easily to older qemu-dm versions.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Tim.

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ben Guthro]

There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.

We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.

If there is interest in seeing the 3.1 patch, I'd be happy to post it.



Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known issue.
>
> K. Y
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>   

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

Thanks Ben. I would be interested in the patch.

K. Y

>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  2:42 PM, in message <46BA0E9B.6020305@virtualiron.com>,
Ben Guthro <bguthro@virtualiron.com> wrote: 
> There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
> There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.
> 
> We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
> since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.
> 
> If there is interest in seeing the 3.1 patch, I'd be happy to post it.
> 
> 
> 
> Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known 
> issue.
>>
>> K. Y
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>   

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ben Guthro]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 978 bytes --]

Patch is attached. Hope this helps


Ky Srinivasan wrote:
> Thanks Ben. I would be interested in the patch.
>
> K. Y
>
>   
>>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  2:42 PM, in message <46BA0E9B.6020305@virtualiron.com>,
>>>>         
> Ben Guthro <bguthro@virtualiron.com> wrote: 
>   
>> There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
>> There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.
>>
>> We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
>> since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.
>>
>> If there is interest in seeing the 3.1 patch, I'd be happy to post it.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>>     
>>> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known 
>>>       
>> issue.
>>     
>>> K. Y
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>   
>>>       
>
>
>   


[-- Attachment #2: qemu-rtl8139-crc.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1014 bytes --]

diff -r 05858d742ba7 tools/ioemu/hw/rtl8139.c
--- a/tools/ioemu/hw/rtl8139.c	Wed Jul 18 10:46:24 2007 -0400
+++ b/tools/ioemu/hw/rtl8139.c	Wed Jul 18 10:46:30 2007 -0400
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
 
 /* RTL8139 provides frame CRC with received packet, this feature seems to be
    ignored by most drivers, disabled by default */
-//#define RTL8139_CALCULATE_RXCRC 1
+#define RTL8139_CALCULATE_RXCRC 1
 
 /* Uncomment to enable on-board timer interrupts */
 //#define RTL8139_ONBOARD_TIMER 1
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static void rtl8139_do_receive(void *opa
 
         /* write checksum */
 #if defined (RTL8139_CALCULATE_RXCRC)
-        val = cpu_to_le32(crc32(~0, buf, size));
+        val = cpu_to_le32(crc32(0, buf, size));
 #else
         val = 0;
 #endif
@@ -1138,7 +1138,7 @@ static void rtl8139_do_receive(void *opa
 
         /* write checksum */
 #if defined (RTL8139_CALCULATE_RXCRC)
-        val = cpu_to_le32(crc32(~0, buf, size));
+        val = cpu_to_le32(crc32(0, buf, size));
 #else
         val = 0;
 #endif

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 138 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ky Srinivasan]

Thanks Ben. I would be interested in the patch.

K. Y

>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2007 at  2:42 PM, in message <46BA0E9B.6020305@virtualiron.com>,
Ben Guthro <bguthro@virtualiron.com> wrote: 
> There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
> There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.
> 
> We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
> since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.
> 
> If there is interest in seeing the 3.1 patch, I'd be happy to post it.
> 
> 
> 
> Ky Srinivasan wrote:
>> I am having networking issues on fully virtualized Vista. Is this a known 
> issue.
>>
>> K. Y
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>   

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Tim Deegan]

At 14:42 -0400 on 08 Aug (1186584155), Ben Guthro wrote:
> There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
> There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.

Yes; I fixed it in unstable and sent the patch upstream to qemu-devel.

> We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
> since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.

If your patch covers more than the one in -unstable, I'd be very
interested in seeing it. 

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xensource.com>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508

Re: fully virtualized vista

[Ben Guthro]

It looks like its the same patch as 15596.
We must have pulled the patch from the qemu list, without realizing it 
was in unstable.

Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 14:42 -0400 on 08 Aug (1186584155), Ben Guthro wrote:
>   
>> There is a CRC bug in the RTL8139 implementation in the QEMU used in 3.1
>> There have been discussions of this on the QEMU list, as well.
>>     
>
> Yes; I fixed it in unstable and sent the patch upstream to qemu-devel.
>
>   
>> We have a patch for 3.1, but have not ported it forward to unstable yet, 
>> since unstable is using a newer version of QEMU.
>>     
>
> If your patch covers more than the one in -unstable, I'd be very
> interested in seeing it. 
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim.
>
>