From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:13:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C012A8.2040908@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C00FC1.1070306@qumranet.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2037 bytes --]
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to
>> do that.
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the
>> time used by
>> the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat to display this new field.
>>
>> [PATCH 2/2] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to
>> cpustat->guest if we
>> are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
>> cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code
>> although it
>> is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and
>> user to
>> allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified
>> "top(1)" is
>> able to display good cpu user time and cpu guest time by subtracting
>> cpu guest
>> time from cpu user time.
>>
>
> [copying Ingo and Rusty]
>
> The patches look good. A couple of comments:
>
> - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
> (selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is
> only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine
> cousin will want to use this as well.
There is also a CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION and a CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (from
s390 and powerpc) Which one to use ?
I'm wondering if we can have a more accurate accounting:
- For the moment we add all system time since the previous entering to the VCPU
to the guest time (and I guess there is some real system time in it ???)
- Perhaps we can sum nanoseconds spent in the VCPU and add it to cpustat when
these ns are greater than 1 ms ? (I'm trying to make something in this way)
> - I think that there is per-task accounting of user time and system
> time; that should be extended as well.
it should be easy to do too...
Laurent
--
------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: kvm-devel
<kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org>,
linux-kernel
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
virtualization
<virtualization-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 10:13:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46C012A8.2040908@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C00FC1.1070306-atKUWr5tajBWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2057 bytes --]
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to
>> do that.
>>
>> [PATCH 1/2] introduce a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store the
>> time used by
>> the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat to display this new field.
>>
>> [PATCH 2/2] modify account_system_time() to add cputime to
>> cpustat->guest if we
>> are running a VCPU. We add this cputime to cpustat->user instead of
>> cpustat->system because this part of KVM code is in fact user code
>> although it
>> is executed in the kernel. We duplicate VCPU time between guest and
>> user to
>> allow an unmodified "top(1)" to display correct value. A modified
>> "top(1)" is
>> able to display good cpu user time and cpu guest time by subtracting
>> cpu guest
>> time from cpu user time.
>>
>
> [copying Ingo and Rusty]
>
> The patches look good. A couple of comments:
>
> - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
> (selected by CONFIG_KVM)? that way the (minor) additional overhead is
> only incurred if it can possibly be used. I imagine that our canine
> cousin will want to use this as well.
There is also a CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION and a CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING (from
s390 and powerpc) Which one to use ?
I'm wondering if we can have a more accurate accounting:
- For the moment we add all system time since the previous entering to the VCPU
to the guest time (and I guess there is some real system time in it ???)
- Perhaps we can sum nanoseconds spent in the VCPU and add it to cpustat when
these ns are greater than 1 ms ? (I'm trying to make something in this way)
> - I think that there is per-task accounting of user time and system
> time; that should be extended as well.
it should be easy to do too...
Laurent
--
------------- Laurent.Vivier-6ktuUTfB/bM@public.gmane.org --------------
"Software is hard" - Donald Knuth
[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 315 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 186 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
kvm-devel mailing list
kvm-devel-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kvm-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-13 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-10 15:58 [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:01 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:01 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:13 ` [kvm-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:13 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2007-08-13 8:13 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 8:38 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:38 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 8:38 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 13:08 ` [kvm-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 13:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 13:08 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 13:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 13:22 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:15 ` [kvm-devel] " Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:19 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:19 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:19 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:26 ` [kvm-devel] " Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:37 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 20:40 ` [kvm-devel] " Heiko Carstens
2007-08-13 20:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-08-13 20:40 ` Heiko Carstens
2007-08-19 9:32 ` List stripping out cc's (was: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting) Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 9:32 ` List stripping out cc's (was: " Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 19:53 ` List stripping out cc's Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 19:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 19:53 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-19 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 20:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-19 9:32 ` List stripping out cc's (was: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting) Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:37 ` [kvm-devel] [PATCH 0/2][KVM] guest time accounting Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:26 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:15 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 8:01 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:05 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:10 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 14:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 14:22 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 14:30 ` [kvm-devel] " Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:30 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-13 14:41 ` [kvm-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 14:41 ` Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 15:22 ` [kvm-devel] " Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 15:22 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-08-13 15:36 ` [kvm-devel] " Laurent Vivier
2007-08-13 15:36 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46C012A8.2040908@bull.net \
--to=laurent.vivier@bull.net \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.