All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH4/4] [POWERPC] Fix cpm_uart driver
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:22:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F80049.2030509@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F7EE95.1040509@scram.de>

Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Scott Wood schrieb:
>> Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>>>
>>> In cpm_uart_core, functions cpm_uart_init_bd and cpm_uart_init_scc
>>> an offset into DP RAM is calculated by substracting a physical
>>> memory constant from an virtual address. This patch fixes the
>>> problem by converting the virtual address into a physical
>>> first.
>>
>> Huh?  DPRAM_BASE is a virtual address.  With this patch, you'd be 
>> subtracting a virtual address from a physical address.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me to it. So the bug is in cpm_uart_cpm1.h assigning 
> a physical memory to DPRAM_BASE (at least on ARC=ppc). cpm_uart_cpm2.h 
> seems to be correct though. I'll submit a new patch for this.

cpmp is a physical address on arch/ppc?
/me looks at arch/ppc/8xx_io/commproc.c

Yikes.  Please don't change cpm_uart_cpm1.h, as it's correct for 
arch/powerpc, and there are numerous other places that assume cpmp is 
virtual (including in the very same function that assigns it a physical 
address).

You could fix arch/ppc if you want, though it may be easier to wait for 
it to die, and insist on identity maps in the meantime. :-)

-Scott

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
To: Jochen Friedrich <jochen@scram.de>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH4/4] [POWERPC] Fix cpm_uart driver
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:22:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F80049.2030509@freescale.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46F7EE95.1040509@scram.de>

Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> Scott Wood schrieb:
>> Jochen Friedrich wrote:
>>>
>>> In cpm_uart_core, functions cpm_uart_init_bd and cpm_uart_init_scc
>>> an offset into DP RAM is calculated by substracting a physical
>>> memory constant from an virtual address. This patch fixes the
>>> problem by converting the virtual address into a physical
>>> first.
>>
>> Huh?  DPRAM_BASE is a virtual address.  With this patch, you'd be 
>> subtracting a virtual address from a physical address.
> 
> Thanks for pointing me to it. So the bug is in cpm_uart_cpm1.h assigning 
> a physical memory to DPRAM_BASE (at least on ARC=ppc). cpm_uart_cpm2.h 
> seems to be correct though. I'll submit a new patch for this.

cpmp is a physical address on arch/ppc?
/me looks at arch/ppc/8xx_io/commproc.c

Yikes.  Please don't change cpm_uart_cpm1.h, as it's correct for 
arch/powerpc, and there are numerous other places that assume cpmp is 
virtual (including in the very same function that assigns it a physical 
address).

You could fix arch/ppc if you want, though it may be easier to wait for 
it to die, and insist on identity maps in the meantime. :-)

-Scott

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-24 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-23 20:17 [PATCH4/4] [POWERPC] Fix cpm_uart driver Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-23 20:17 ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-24 15:57 ` Scott Wood
2007-09-24 15:57   ` Scott Wood
2007-09-24 17:06   ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-24 17:06     ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-24 18:22     ` Scott Wood [this message]
2007-09-24 18:22       ` Scott Wood
2007-09-24 19:16       ` Dan Malek
2007-09-24 19:16         ` Dan Malek
2007-09-24 19:29         ` Scott Wood
2007-09-24 19:29           ` Scott Wood
2007-09-26 20:32           ` Rune Torgersen
2007-09-26 20:32             ` Rune Torgersen
2007-09-26 20:41             ` Scott Wood
2007-09-26 20:41               ` Scott Wood
2007-09-25 12:09       ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-25 12:09         ` Jochen Friedrich
2007-09-25 15:11         ` Scott Wood
2007-09-25 15:11           ` Scott Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F80049.2030509@freescale.com \
    --to=scottwood@freescale.com \
    --cc=jochen@scram.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.