All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
@ 2007-10-18 20:16 Paul
  2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
  2007-10-19  3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul @ 2007-10-18 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: adeos-main


Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures 
cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in 
arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c. Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or 
following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?


Regards, Paul.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
  2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
@ 2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
  2007-10-19  3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2007-10-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul; +Cc: adeos-main

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 528 bytes --]

Paul wrote:
> Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures 
> cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in 
> arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c. Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or 
> following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?

Nope, we should rather remove the obsolete code from the ipipe core. You
could simply kill ipipe_declare_cpuid and replace the cpuid spots with
ipipe_processor_id() (compare to latest i386 ipipe). Cleanup patches
always welcome!

Jan


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
  2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
  2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2007-10-19  3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Gerum @ 2007-10-19  3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul; +Cc: adeos-main

On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 21:16 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures 
> cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in 
> arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c.

It seems I forgot to compile with IPIPE_COMPAT off before releasing...
Sorry for that. This one should be ok:

http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/x86_64/adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-x86_64-1.2-05.patch

> Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or 
> following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?
> 

We really want to get rid of the ipipe_get/lock_cpu constructs, so i386
should be followed.

> 
> Regards, Paul.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Adeos-main mailing list
> Adeos-main@domain.hid
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
-- 
Philippe.




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-19  3:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-10-19  3:38 ` Philippe Gerum

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.