* [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
@ 2007-10-18 20:16 Paul
2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-10-19 3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Paul @ 2007-10-18 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: adeos-main
Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures
cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in
arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c. Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or
following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?
Regards, Paul.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
@ 2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-10-19 3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kiszka @ 2007-10-18 21:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul; +Cc: adeos-main
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 528 bytes --]
Paul wrote:
> Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures
> cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in
> arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c. Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or
> following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?
Nope, we should rather remove the obsolete code from the ipipe core. You
could simply kill ipipe_declare_cpuid and replace the cpuid spots with
ipipe_processor_id() (compare to latest i386 ipipe). Cleanup patches
always welcome!
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 249 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ?
2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
@ 2007-10-19 3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Philippe Gerum @ 2007-10-19 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul; +Cc: adeos-main
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 21:16 +0100, Paul wrote:
> Attempting to compile on x86_64 with SMP enabled, getting quite a few failures
> cetered around ipipe_declare_cpuid being undeclared in
> arch/x86_64/kernel/ipipe.c.
It seems I forgot to compile with IPIPE_COMPAT off before releasing...
Sorry for that. This one should be ok:
http://download.gna.org/adeos/patches/v2.6/x86_64/adeos-ipipe-2.6.23-x86_64-1.2-05.patch
> Should we be including ipipe_compat.h or
> following the lead set in arch/i386/kernel/ipipe.c ?
>
We really want to get rid of the ipipe_get/lock_cpu constructs, so i386
should be followed.
>
> Regards, Paul.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Adeos-main mailing list
> Adeos-main@domain.hid
> https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/adeos-main
--
Philippe.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-19 3:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-18 20:16 [Adeos-main] 2.6.23 x86_64 broken for SMP ? Paul
2007-10-18 21:50 ` Jan Kiszka
2007-10-19 3:38 ` Philippe Gerum
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.