* [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
@ 2008-05-21 18:25 Pekka J Enberg
2008-05-21 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pekka J Enberg @ 2008-05-21 18:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: clameter, mpm, lethal, dhowells
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
This patch changes ksize() to be more strict with objets passed to it. We now
set PageSlab also for objects allocated with page allocator and use page->slab
to check whether page is a regular slab page or a pass-through page.
Also moves kmalloc_large() out-of-line as it's too big for inlining now.
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
---
include/linux/slub_def.h | 5 +----
mm/slub.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/slub_def.h b/include/linux/slub_def.h
index 71e43a1..542f828 100644
--- a/include/linux/slub_def.h
+++ b/include/linux/slub_def.h
@@ -201,10 +201,7 @@ static __always_inline struct kmem_cache *kmalloc_slab(size_t size)
void *kmem_cache_alloc(struct kmem_cache *, gfp_t);
void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags);
-static __always_inline void *kmalloc_large(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
-{
- return (void *)__get_free_pages(flags | __GFP_COMP, get_order(size));
-}
+void *kmalloc_large(size_t, gfp_t);
static __always_inline void *kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
{
diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index a505a82..84b9689 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -2687,15 +2687,29 @@ void *__kmalloc(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__kmalloc);
+void *kmalloc_large(size_t size, gfp_t flags)
+{
+ struct page *page;
+
+ page = alloc_pages(flags | __GFP_COMP, get_order(size));
+ if (!page)
+ return NULL;
+
+ __SetPageSlab(page);
+ return page_address(page);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(kmalloc_large);
+
static void *kmalloc_large_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
{
struct page *page = alloc_pages_node(node, flags | __GFP_COMP,
get_order(size));
- if (page)
- return page_address(page);
- else
+ if (!page)
return NULL;
+
+ __SetPageSlab(page);
+ return page_address(page);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
@@ -2725,12 +2739,12 @@ size_t ksize(const void *object)
return 0;
page = virt_to_head_page(object);
+ BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page));
+ s = page->slab;
- if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page)))
+ if (unlikely(!s))
return PAGE_SIZE << compound_order(page);
- s = page->slab;
-
#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
/*
* Debugging requires use of the padding between object
@@ -2756,6 +2770,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ksize);
void kfree(const void *x)
{
+ struct kmem_cache *s;
struct page *page;
void *object = (void *)x;
@@ -2763,11 +2778,14 @@ void kfree(const void *x)
return;
page = virt_to_head_page(x);
- if (unlikely(!PageSlab(page))) {
+ BUG_ON(!PageSlab(page));
+ s = page->slab;
+ if (unlikely(!s)) {
+ __ClearPageSlab(page);
put_page(page);
return;
}
- slab_free(page->slab, page, object, __builtin_return_address(0));
+ slab_free(s, page, object, __builtin_return_address(0));
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree);
--
1.5.2.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
2008-05-21 18:25 [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through Pekka J Enberg
@ 2008-05-21 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 18:56 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-05-21 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka J Enberg; +Cc: linux-kernel, mpm, lethal, dhowells
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Pekka J Enberg wrote:
> This patch changes ksize() to be more strict with objets passed to it. We now
> set PageSlab also for objects allocated with page allocator and use page->slab
> to check whether page is a regular slab page or a pass-through page.
>
> Also moves kmalloc_large() out-of-line as it's too big for inlining now.
Why is it too big? Without your additions it is converting kmallocs
inline to get_free_pages(). That results in a simple function call with
two constant parameters.
The patch touches the page struct uselessly. I think the PageSlab marking
is useful for debugging but not for a production kernel.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
2008-05-21 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-05-21 18:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 21:18 ` Christoph Lameter
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-05-21 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter; +Cc: linux-kernel, mpm, lethal, dhowells
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> Why is it too big? Without your additions it is converting kmallocs
> inline to get_free_pages(). That results in a simple function call with
> two constant parameters.
Well, it's a PITA because of #include dependencies in any case. Is
moving it out-of-line a problem?
Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The patch touches the page struct uselessly. I think the PageSlab marking
> is useful for debugging but not for a production kernel.
Hmm, where? page_address() already references ->virtual. I suppose
CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is a no no as well then so do we want to add a
CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG config option...? (Btw, I removed the BUG_ON() from
kfree() as spotted by Vegard Nossum.)
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
2008-05-21 18:56 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2008-05-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 21:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 21:18 ` Christoph Lameter
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-05-21 21:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg; +Cc: linux-kernel, mpm, lethal, dhowells
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Why is it too big? Without your additions it is converting kmallocs inline
> > to get_free_pages(). That results in a simple function call with two
> > constant parameters.
>
> Well, it's a PITA because of #include dependencies in any case. Is moving it
> out-of-line a problem?
>
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > The patch touches the page struct uselessly. I think the PageSlab marking is
> > useful for debugging but not for a production kernel.
>
> Hmm, where? page_address() already references ->virtual. I suppose
> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is a no no as well then so do we want to add a
> CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG config option...? (Btw, I removed the BUG_ON() from kfree()
> as spotted by Vegard Nossum.)
If it has to be then add CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG. There are a number of
debugging techniques (kmem_check?) that should not be compiled in. Maybe
add a new config option for those. CONFIG_SLUB_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_DEBUG?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
2008-05-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-05-21 21:15 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2008-05-21 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Lameter, Vegard Nossum; +Cc: linux-kernel, mpm, lethal, dhowells
Christoph Lameter wrote:
>> Hmm, where? page_address() already references ->virtual. I suppose
>> CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG is a no no as well then so do we want to add a
>> CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG config option...? (Btw, I removed the BUG_ON() from kfree()
>> as spotted by Vegard Nossum.)
>
> If it has to be then add CONFIG_KSIZE_DEBUG. There are a number of
> debugging techniques (kmem_check?) that should not be compiled in. Maybe
> add a new config option for those. CONFIG_SLUB_ENABLE_EXPENSIVE_DEBUG?
Oh, kmemcheck is a separate config option already and it's *much much*
more expensive than the ksize() checks will ever be so they shouldn't be
bundled together anyway.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through
2008-05-21 18:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
@ 2008-05-21 21:18 ` Christoph Lameter
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Lameter @ 2008-05-21 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg; +Cc: linux-kernel, mpm, lethal, dhowells
On Wed, 21 May 2008, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hmm, where? page_address() already references ->virtual. I suppose
The ->virtual case is a very special case. page_address() currently should
reduce to a simple shift and an add with VMEMMAP.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-05-21 21:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-05-21 18:25 [RFC/PATCH 2/3] SLUB: make ksize() more strict for page allocator pass-through Pekka J Enberg
2008-05-21 18:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 18:56 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2008-05-21 21:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2008-05-21 21:18 ` Christoph Lameter
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.