All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:03:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C46BCB.2060209@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080907234418.GB26079@one.firstfloor.org>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 03:21:18PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> __acpi_map_table() effectively reimplements early_ioremap().  Rather
>> than have that duplication, just implement it in terms of
>> early_ioremap().
>>
>> However, unlike early_ioremap(), __acpi_map_table() just maintains a
>> single mapping which gets replaced each call, and has no corresponding
>> unmap function.  Implement this by just removing the previous mapping
>> each time its called.  Unfortunately, this will leave a stray mapping
>> at the end.
>>     
>
> It would be better to just fix the ACPI code to unmap.

I was concerned that would cause lots of cross-arch churn, but of course
the only other relevant architecture is ia64.  I'll prep a followup patch.

    J

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:03:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C46BCB.2060209@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080907234418.GB26079@one.firstfloor.org>

Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 03:21:18PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>   
>> __acpi_map_table() effectively reimplements early_ioremap().  Rather
>> than have that duplication, just implement it in terms of
>> early_ioremap().
>>
>> However, unlike early_ioremap(), __acpi_map_table() just maintains a
>> single mapping which gets replaced each call, and has no corresponding
>> unmap function.  Implement this by just removing the previous mapping
>> each time its called.  Unfortunately, this will leave a stray mapping
>> at the end.
>>     
>
> It would be better to just fix the ACPI code to unmap.

I was concerned that would cause lots of cross-arch churn, but of course
the only other relevant architecture is ia64.  I'll prep a followup patch.

    J

  reply	other threads:[~2008-09-08  0:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-07 22:21 [PATCH 0 of 7] x86: lay groundwork for Xen domain 0 support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 13:32   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 13:32     ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:47     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:47       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:56       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:56         ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 15:29         ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:29           ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:48           ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 15:48             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 16:05             ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 16:05               ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-10  9:55         ` [Xen-devel] " Avi Kivity
2008-09-10  9:55           ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-10 16:38           ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 16:38             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 16:55             ` [Xen-devel] " Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 17:27               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 2 of 7] x86: remove duplicate early_ioremap declarations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 3 of 7] x86: add early_memremap() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 4 of 7] x86: use early_memremap() in setup.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 5 of 7] x86-64: don't check for map replacement Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:44   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08  0:03     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2008-09-08  0:03       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 14:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 14:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 16:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 16:29           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 11:55         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 16:49           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11  7:33             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 18:36               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11 18:56                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:34             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-11 21:07               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-12  9:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-12 17:31                   ` Yinghai Lu
     [not found]             ` <20080911125748.GA14698@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 21:33               ` [PATCH] acpi: remove final __acpi_map_table mapping before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:35   ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-07 23:35     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08  0:02     ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:02       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:14       ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08  0:14         ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48C46BCB.2060209@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.