All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO	mappings
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:55:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C7998D.1030408@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C68EA3.4050508@qumranet.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure; I still don't really understand how _PAGE_SPECIAL gets
>> used, other than being user-mode mapping only.  But in principle,
>> _PAGE_IOMAP could be set on both kernel and user mappings (if you direct
>> map a device into a process address space), so I think they would
>> conflict then?
>>
>>   
>
> It's a "don't refcount me" flag, which is not sematically the same as 
> I/O, but may be close enough.

Actually it's more of a "no struct page" flag, which implies no 
refcounting.  And not having a struct page should correspond well to a 
pte not requiring pfn->mfn conversion and being an I/O page.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO	mappings
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 12:55:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48C7998D.1030408@qumranet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48C68EA3.4050508@qumranet.com>

Avi Kivity wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure; I still don't really understand how _PAGE_SPECIAL gets
>> used, other than being user-mode mapping only.  But in principle,
>> _PAGE_IOMAP could be set on both kernel and user mappings (if you direct
>> map a device into a process address space), so I think they would
>> conflict then?
>>
>>   
>
> It's a "don't refcount me" flag, which is not sematically the same as 
> I/O, but may be close enough.

Actually it's more of a "no struct page" flag, which implies no 
refcounting.  And not having a struct page should correspond well to a 
pte not requiring pfn->mfn conversion and being an I/O page.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-09-10  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-09-07 22:21 [PATCH 0 of 7] x86: lay groundwork for Xen domain 0 support Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 1 of 7] x86: add _PAGE_IOMAP pte flag for IO mappings Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 13:32   ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 13:32     ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:47     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:47       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 14:56       ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 14:56         ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-09 15:29         ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:29           ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 15:48           ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 15:48             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-09 16:05             ` [Xen-devel] " Keir Fraser
2008-09-09 16:05               ` Keir Fraser
2008-09-10  9:55         ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2008-09-10  9:55           ` Avi Kivity
2008-09-10 16:38           ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 16:38             ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 16:55             ` [Xen-devel] " Nick Piggin
2008-09-10 17:27               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 2 of 7] x86: remove duplicate early_ioremap declarations Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 3 of 7] x86: add early_memremap() Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 4 of 7] x86: use early_memremap() in setup.c Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 5 of 7] x86-64: don't check for map replacement Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 6 of 7] x86: use early_ioremap in __acpi_map_table Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:44   ` Andi Kleen
2008-09-08  0:03     ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:03       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 14:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 14:26         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-08 16:29         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 16:29           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41         ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08 19:41           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-10 11:55         ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-10 16:49           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11  7:33             ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 18:36               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-11 18:56                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-11 20:34             ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-11 21:07               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-12  9:49                 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-09-12 17:31                   ` Yinghai Lu
     [not found]             ` <20080911125748.GA14698@elte.hu>
2008-09-11 21:33               ` [PATCH] acpi: remove final __acpi_map_table mapping before setting acpi_gbl_permanent_mmap Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 22:21 ` [PATCH 7 of 7] x86: always explicitly map acpi memory Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-07 23:35   ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-07 23:35     ` Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08  0:02     ` [Xen-devel] " Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:02       ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-09-08  0:14       ` [Xen-devel] " Yinghai Lu
2008-09-08  0:14         ` Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48C7998D.1030408@qumranet.com \
    --to=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.