* Stand at FOSDEM
@ 2008-11-10 2:20 Philip Balister
2008-11-10 11:36 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2008-11-10 14:10 ` Phil Blundell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philip Balister @ 2008-11-10 2:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 150 bytes --]
It looks like FOSDEM is Feb 7-8 this year.
Do we want to do a stand again this year? Who would be interested in
working on the stand?
Philip
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 2:20 Stand at FOSDEM Philip Balister
@ 2008-11-10 11:36 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2008-11-10 14:10 ` Phil Blundell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alessandro GARDICH @ 2008-11-10 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Philip Balister wrote:
> It looks like FOSDEM is Feb 7-8 this year.
>
> Do we want to do a stand again this year? Who would be interested in
> working on the stand?
>
> Philip
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>
mhhh really early this year ...
my intention is to attend at fosdem this year too
and if we have a stand I can help on it.
--
/-------------------------------------------------------------\
| Alessandro Gardich : gremlin#gremlin!it |
>-------------------------------------------------------------<
| I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. |
| A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough |
| without ever having felt sorry for itself. |
\-------------------------------------------------------------/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 2:20 Stand at FOSDEM Philip Balister
2008-11-10 11:36 ` Alessandro GARDICH
@ 2008-11-10 14:10 ` Phil Blundell
2008-11-10 14:16 ` Philip Balister
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2008-11-10 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel; +Cc: openembedded-devel
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 19:20 -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
> It looks like FOSDEM is Feb 7-8 this year.
>
> Do we want to do a stand again this year? Who would be interested in
> working on the stand?
Not that I want to pour cold water on any such plan, but personally I'm
not terribly convinced that a stand is very good value in terms of
benefits that it brings compared to the time taken to man it. FOSDEM
represents one of the fairly rare occasions when you have a significant
number of developers all in one place and, face-to-face time being such
a scarce resource, I can't help thinking that there are probably better
things to do with it.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 14:10 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2008-11-10 14:16 ` Philip Balister
2008-11-10 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philip Balister @ 2008-11-10 14:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 831 bytes --]
Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 19:20 -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
>> It looks like FOSDEM is Feb 7-8 this year.
>>
>> Do we want to do a stand again this year? Who would be interested in
>> working on the stand?
>
> Not that I want to pour cold water on any such plan, but personally I'm
> not terribly convinced that a stand is very good value in terms of
> benefits that it brings compared to the time taken to man it. FOSDEM
> represents one of the fairly rare occasions when you have a significant
> number of developers all in one place and, face-to-face time being such
> a scarce resource, I can't help thinking that there are probably better
> things to do with it.
So you are suggesting we request a devroom for some grooup hacking? Last
year the stand was a mini devroom :)
Philip
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3303 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 14:16 ` Philip Balister
@ 2008-11-10 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
2008-11-10 18:33 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2008-11-10 21:53 ` Philippe De Swert
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Phil Blundell @ 2008-11-10 16:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 07:16 -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
> So you are suggesting we request a devroom for some grooup hacking? Last
> year the stand was a mini devroom :)
Not necessarily for hacking as such, but yes: I think a devroom (either
dedicated, or as some kind of splinter faction of the embedded track)
would probably be more productive than a stand.
Alternatively we could set up an unofficial OE track in, say, the Cafe
de l'Université. :-) Of course, downside there is no internet access.
p.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
@ 2008-11-10 18:33 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2008-11-10 21:53 ` Philippe De Swert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Michael 'Mickey' Lauer @ 2008-11-10 18:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
As much as I love getting in touch with "visitors", I have to share Phil's
concerns.
I'm afraid though that we are too unimportant to qualify for a developer room.
This and we would need to have a more formal program (presentations et. al.)
than just a hackathon.
> Alternatively we could set up an unofficial OE track in, say, the Cafe
> de l'Université. :-)
This is a very good idea! Leffe...
:M:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Stand at FOSDEM
2008-11-10 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
2008-11-10 18:33 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
@ 2008-11-10 21:53 ` Philippe De Swert
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Philippe De Swert @ 2008-11-10 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hi peeps,
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 16:03 +0000, Phil Blundell wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 07:16 -0700, Philip Balister wrote:
> > So you are suggesting we request a devroom for some grooup hacking? Last
> > year the stand was a mini devroom :)
>
> Not necessarily for hacking as such, but yes: I think a devroom (either
> dedicated, or as some kind of splinter faction of the embedded track)
> would probably be more productive than a stand.
Depending on the quality and amount of presentations in the embedded
devroom, I could always try to make some room on Sunday morning for OE.
Of course I am not the only one to decide on this, so I cannot make any
promises. But given a decent proposal this could be considered.
> Alternatively we could set up an unofficial OE track in, say, the Cafe
> de l'Université. :-) Of course, downside there is no internet access.
It should be possible to track down a pub/bar/brasserie with Wifi in
Brussels.
Cheers,
Philippe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-11-10 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-10 2:20 Stand at FOSDEM Philip Balister
2008-11-10 11:36 ` Alessandro GARDICH
2008-11-10 14:10 ` Phil Blundell
2008-11-10 14:16 ` Philip Balister
2008-11-10 16:03 ` Phil Blundell
2008-11-10 18:33 ` Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
2008-11-10 21:53 ` Philippe De Swert
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.