All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:47:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A78C79.304@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1235687483.6811.26.camel@localhost.localdomain>

john stultz wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 23:06 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, john stultz wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 22:35 +0100, Jesper Krogh wrote:
>>>>> Also mind sending the full dmesg for both kernels?
>>>> http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.29-rc6.txt
>>>> http://krogh.cc/~jesper/dmesg-2.6.26.8.txt
>>> So one interesting difference:
>>> 2.6.26.8:	TSC calibrated against PM_TIMER
>>> 2.6.29-rc6:	Fast TSC calibration using PIT
>>>
>>> Thomas, any thoughts as to why we might be calibrating off the PIT
>>> instead of the PM_TIMER w/ 2.6.29?
>> Yup, because we introduced the Fast PIT calibration in 2.6.28.
> 
> Ah. Ok.
> 
>> Is the delta anything NTP might get upset about:
>>
>> 2.6.26: time.c: Detected 2311.847 MHz processor.
>> 2.6.29: Detected 2310.029 MHz processor.
> 
> I wouldn't think so.
> 
> Although, I'm recalling on some systems here right after we deploy them
> we'll see something similar to the originally reported ntpd "time reset"
> noise for a period of time while ntpd tries to find the right freq. For
> some reason, I've noticed, having multiple servers in your ntp.conf
> seems to increase NTP's difficulty at picking a time and converging. 
> 
> So this may be just the slight calibration change is confusing ntp or it
> may be the NTP_INTERVAL_LENGTH change from awhile back which would cause
> the drift value to change could be doing the same thing (although I
> thought that landed in the 2.6.24 timeframe, but I may be forgetting).
> 
> I'll kick up some of my own testing between these two releases to see if
> I can't find something similar.
> 
> Jesper: How long was the box up for when you noticed the ntpd noise?

I was booted Feb 25 21:58 .. the first noice from ntp starts here:
Feb 25 22:09:53 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:09:56 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.13, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:14:08 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:16:20 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.13, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:32:25 quad12 ntpd[4901]: time reset -1.601641 s
Feb 25 22:36:18 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13
Feb 25 22:36:45 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to 10.194.133.12, stratum 4
Feb 25 22:51:41 quad12 ntpd[4901]: time reset -0.922993 s
Feb 25 22:55:05 quad12 ntpd[4901]: synchronized to LOCAL(0), stratum 13



> Also what's the output of the following under the different kernels:
> ntpdc -c peers
> ntpdc -c kerninfo

Working (clocksource=acpi_pm) 2.6.29-rc6
jk@quad02:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           -0.001577 s
pll frequency:        -45.787 ppm
maximum error:        0.066739 s
estimated error:      0.000768 s
status:               0001  pll
pll time constant:    6
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad02:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
*hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.81    4   64  377 0.00008  0.003752 0.04816
=svn.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.81    4   64  377 0.00009 -0.008724 0.04979
=LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64  377 0.00000  0.000000 0.03082


Working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.26.8
jk@quad03:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           0.003208 s
pll frequency:        -25.070 ppm
maximum error:        0.833193 s
estimated error:      0.002787 s
status:               4001  pll
pll time constant:    10
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad03:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
*hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.82    4 1024  377 0.00781  0.006788 0.13666
=sal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.82    4 1024  377 0.00018 -0.000541 0.12175
=LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64  377 0.00000  0.000000 0.03041

Non-working (clocksource=tsc) 2.6.29-rc6
jk@quad12:~$ ntpdc -c kerninfo
pll offset:           0 s
pll frequency:        -34.754 ppm
maximum error:        0.023514 s
estimated error:      0 s
status:               0001  pll
pll time constant:    6
precision:            1e-06 s
frequency tolerance:  500 ppm
jk@quad12:~$ ntpdc -c peers
      remote           local      st poll reach  delay   offset    disp
=======================================================================
=hal.nzcorp.net  10.194.132.91    4   64   17 0.00011 -0.069377 0.96895
=trac.nzcorp.net 10.194.132.91    4   64   17 0.00011 -0.096107 0.96904
*LOCAL(0)        127.0.0.1       13   64   17 0.00000  0.000000 0.96857


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27  6:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-23  4:31 Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-23 14:07 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 - Fix oops in i915_gem_retire_requests Karsten Wiese
2009-02-26 11:15 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 17:17   ` MTD_CK804XROM warning (Was: Linux 2.6.29-rc6) Marcin Slusarz
2009-02-26 17:17     ` Marcin Slusarz
2009-02-26 17:53   ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:22     ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:22       ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:31     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:31       ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:36       ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:36         ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:46         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:46           ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:49           ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:49             ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 20:53         ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-02-26 20:53           ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-02-26 20:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 20:32         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:55 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 20:33   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 20:43     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:19       ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:35         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:46           ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:54             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:04               ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27  6:30             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:51             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:49           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-01 15:04             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:54           ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:06             ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:24               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31               ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:40                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:59                   ` john stultz
2009-02-27  7:33                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 20:50                       ` john stultz
2009-02-27  6:47                 ` Jesper Krogh [this message]
2009-02-27 20:35                   ` john stultz
2009-03-01 20:13                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02  9:53                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02 21:27                       ` john stultz
2009-03-03  6:04                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 19:53                           ` john stultz
2009-03-03 20:19                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:22                               ` john stultz
2009-03-04 15:30                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-04 18:36                                   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-04 18:57                                     ` John Stultz
2009-03-05  2:39                                       ` john stultz
2009-03-05  2:52                                         ` john stultz
2009-03-05  8:43                                           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-06  3:13                                             ` john stultz
2009-03-06  3:54                                               ` john stultz
2009-03-06 11:34                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 20:42                                           ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10  4:26                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-10 11:29                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-10 19:42                                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10 22:22                                                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-15 19:53                                                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:40                                                       ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15  1:19                                             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 15:44                                               ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 18:09                                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 18:38                                                   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 19:02                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 19:52                                                       ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:59                                                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 19:32                                                           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17  1:43                                                             ` john stultz
2009-03-17  8:14                                                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 15:48                                                               ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:13                                                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 16:28                                                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:40                                                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 17:28                                                                   ` Olivier Galibert
2009-03-21  9:11                                                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-21 10:06                                                               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 20:32                                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-03 20:39                             ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:16                               ` john stultz
2009-03-04  5:36                                 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:09   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:44     ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 (clocksource) Sitsofe Wheeler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A78C79.304@krogh.cc \
    --to=jesper@krogh.cc \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.