From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 19:36:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49AECA3B.5030503@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49AE9EA4.2080500@krogh.cc>
Jesper Krogh wrote:
> john stultz wrote:
>> I guess something to test my idea above (that the drift is bad enough
>> that NTPd isn't making slew adjustments via adjtimex offset) is to
>> remove NTPd from the init.d startup.
>>
>> Then after rebooting (into 2.6.29), run the attached python script for
>> 10 minutes or so to get an idea of the ppm drift. Then repeat with
>> 2.6.26.
>>
>> To run: ./drift-test.py <ntp server>
>>
>> It will give some wild ppm numbers, but after a few minutes it should
>> settle down to the "natural drift" of the system.
>
> Ok. I removed ntpd from the system... heres is from "non-working
Updated. I think I has NTPd running in the former "non-working" test. I
just tried to reproduce the numbers, and they look like this
(reproducible on 2.6.29-rc6).
jk@quad12:~$ python drift-test.py 10.192.96.19
04 Mar 19:27:10 offset: -0.157696 drift: -693.0 ppm
04 Mar 19:28:10 offset: -0.195134 drift: -625.098360656 ppm
04 Mar 19:29:10 offset: -0.232579 drift: -624.595041322 ppm
04 Mar 19:30:10 offset: -0.270021 drift: -624.408839779 ppm
04 Mar 19:31:11 offset: -0.307461 drift: -621.727272727 ppm
04 Mar 19:32:11 offset: -0.344903 drift: -622.185430464 ppm
04 Mar 19:33:11 offset: -0.382345 drift: -622.491712707 ppm
04 Mar 19:34:11 offset: -0.419794 drift: -622.727488152 ppm
04 Mar 19:35:11 offset: -0.457239 drift: -622.89626556 ppm
Still the same.
> And from working 2.6.27.19 kernel.
>
> jk@quad12:~$ python drift-test.py 10.192.96.19
> 04 Mar 16:17:23 offset: -0.006929 drift: -62.0 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:18:24 offset: -0.010252 drift: -54.5967741935 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:19:24 offset: -0.013574 drift: -54.9754098361 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:20:24 offset: -0.016897 drift: -55.1098901099 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:21:24 offset: -0.020233 drift: -55.2314049587 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:22:24 offset: -0.023566 drift: -55.2947019868 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:23:24 offset: -0.026895 drift: -55.3259668508 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:24:24 offset: -0.030217 drift: -55.3317535545 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:25:24 offset: -0.033539 drift: -55.3360995851 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:26:24 offset: -0.036865 drift: -55.3468634686 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:27:25 offset: -0.038266 drift: -52.0713101161 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:28:25 offset: -0.039747 drift: -49.592760181 ppm
> 04 Mar 16:29:25 offset: -0.041331 drift: -47.6680497925 ppm
--
Jesper
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-04 18:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-23 4:31 Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-23 14:07 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 - Fix oops in i915_gem_retire_requests Karsten Wiese
2009-02-26 11:15 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 17:17 ` MTD_CK804XROM warning (Was: Linux 2.6.29-rc6) Marcin Slusarz
2009-02-26 17:17 ` Marcin Slusarz
2009-02-26 17:53 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:22 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:22 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:31 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:31 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:36 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:36 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:46 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:46 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 19:49 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 19:49 ` David Woodhouse
2009-02-26 20:53 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-02-26 20:53 ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2009-02-26 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 19:55 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 20:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 20:43 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:19 ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:35 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:46 ` john stultz
2009-02-26 21:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:04 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 6:30 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:51 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-01 15:04 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-26 21:54 ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-02-26 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:31 ` john stultz
2009-02-26 22:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-02-26 22:59 ` john stultz
2009-02-27 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-02-27 20:50 ` john stultz
2009-02-27 6:47 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35 ` john stultz
2009-03-01 20:13 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02 9:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-02 21:27 ` john stultz
2009-03-03 6:04 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 19:53 ` john stultz
2009-03-03 20:19 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:22 ` john stultz
2009-03-04 15:30 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-04 18:36 ` Jesper Krogh [this message]
2009-03-04 18:57 ` John Stultz
2009-03-05 2:39 ` john stultz
2009-03-05 2:52 ` john stultz
2009-03-05 8:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-06 3:13 ` john stultz
2009-03-06 3:54 ` john stultz
2009-03-06 11:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-09 20:42 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10 4:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-10 11:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-10 19:42 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-10 22:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-03-15 19:53 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:40 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 1:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 15:44 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 18:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 18:38 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-15 19:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-15 19:52 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 18:59 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 19:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 1:43 ` john stultz
2009-03-17 8:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 16:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-17 16:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-17 17:28 ` Olivier Galibert
2009-03-21 9:11 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-21 10:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-03-15 20:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-03-03 20:39 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-03 22:16 ` john stultz
2009-03-04 5:36 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:09 ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 15:44 ` Linux 2.6.29-rc6 (clocksource) Sitsofe Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49AECA3B.5030503@krogh.cc \
--to=jesper@krogh.cc \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.