Re: reiser4 inclusion?

[Christian Stroetmann OntoLab <stroetmann@ontolab.com>]

Dear Arend,
> Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>   
>> So I forked. OntoLab too.
>>     
> Where is you fork, and where is the fork from OntoLab? The reiser4
> patches on http://www.ontolinux.com/technology/ontofs.htm are identical
> to the patches from Eduard
>   
1. I declared that it is not really a fork in the normal sense. I would 
call it a further development.
2. I started mirroring the code to support the development of the 
filesystem and to give it a webpage, which others can count on. This was 
done before the code was put into kernel.org space.
3. I do repeat now again: We're running in circles since 2 or 3 years. I 
also said to this kind of questions in this thread, that we aren't at 
this point actually. That means, we still have not got an open source 
(developer) community conform answer by responsible persons.
4. I hold my code back until the actual maintainer declares what he 
really is doing, is gone, or I have build up an own infrastructure with 
a mailing-list and other needed items. The latter will be what is called 
a fork and follow the advice of the actual maintainer (quote: "Go away").
> Cheers,
>
> Arend
Best regards
Christian *<:o)