From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs
Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:20:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B415E73.1050801@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4807377b1001031906s6b1ee576jc021da2642bb4147@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/03/2010 07:06 PM, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
>> have a system with lots of igb and ixgbe, when iov/vf are enabled for
>> them, we hit the limit of 3064.
>>
>> when system have 20 pcie installed, and one card have 2 functions, and one
>> function need 64 msi-x,
>> may need 20 * 2 * 64 = 2560 for msi-x
>> but if iov and vf are enabled
>> may need 20 * 2 * 64 * 3 = 7680 for msi-x
>> assume system with 5 ioapic, nr_irqs_gsi will be 120.
>> NR_CPUS = 512, and nr_cpu_ids = 128
>> will have NR_IRQS = 256 + 512 * 64 = 33024
>> will have nr_irqs = 120 + 8 * 128 + 120 * 64 = 8824
>>
>> when SPARSE_IRQ is not set, there is no increase with data
>> when NR_CPUS=128, and SPARSE_IRQ is set
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21837444 4216564 12480736 38534744 24bfe58 vmlinux.before
>> 21837442 4216580 12480736 38534758 24bfe66 vmlinux.after
>> when NR_CPUS=4096, and SPARSE_IRQ is set
>> text data bss dec hex filename
>> 21878619 5610244 13415392 40904255 270263f vmlinux.before
>> 21878617 5610244 13415392 40904253 270263d vmlinux.after
>>
>> -v2: update comments to address Ingo's concern
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> I'm not sure this is the best plan, but may be okay for now. What
> happens when all of your slots have 6 port 82599 ixgbe adapters in
> them? They are being made[1], as well as quad port 82576 igb
> adapters, however I'm not fully sure of the SRIOV support of the
> bridges being used on those adapters.
>
> Is it on the table to (re-)design this subsystem to be a little more
> dynamic? There are probably examples in ppc64 or ia64 directories.
> Every time you suggest a limit I can find a case where it won't be
> enough.
>
> [1] http://www.hotlavasystems.com/products_10gbe.html
you mean
20 * 6 * 64 * 3 ?
23040
maybe we can just keep nr_irqs = (256 - 32 - 10) * nr_cpu_ids?
32: for exception
10: for IPI etc.
YH
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-04 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-25 8:42 [PATCH] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2009-12-28 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-29 5:08 ` [PATCH -v2] " Yinghai Lu
2009-12-30 12:21 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Increase " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 3:06 ` [PATCH -v2] x86: increase " Jesse Brandeburg
2010-01-04 3:20 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-04 6:56 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-04 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 0:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-05 0:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-05 5:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Reclaim IDT vectors 0x20-0x2f tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:48 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 20:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 21:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 22:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 5:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Don't waste a vector to improve vector spread tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:08 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: get more exact nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B415E73.1050801@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.