From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:16:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4284C6.9030107@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1262649945.2700.364.camel@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com>
On 01/04/2010 04:05 PM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:50 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> On 01/04/2010 11:45 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:35 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>> sth like this?
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 16 vectors
>>>>
>>>> -v2: according to hpa that we could start from 0x10
>>>> according to Eric, we should hold 16 vectors for IRQ MOVE
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yinghai we have to change IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR to 0x1f or so. From
>>> the cpu perspective this vector is documented as illegal, so we need to
>>> check if this change will work on the cpu's we have today to get some
>>> confidence.
>>>
>>
>> It's documented as reserved, not illegal. The ability for the APIC to
>> generate vectors starting at 0x10 is documented, as is the ability for
>> the CPU to receive any vector number as an interrupt -- in fact, the
>> legacy BIOS relies on being able to receive interrupts starting at
>> vector 0x08. It causes problems galore, but only at the software level.
>
> I have checked out couple of platforms (including 32-bit atom) and 0x1f
> vector logic seems to be working.
>
> Hopefully we won't have other hardware or software issues (vmm
> restrictions etc) with this logic.
>
good. hope it is final version. let's have hpa own it.
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: get back 16 vectors
-v2: according to hpa that we could start from 0x1f
-v3: update comments from Eric
-v4: update comments from hpa
-v5: use round up for IRQ0_VECTOR according to hpa
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
@@ -30,26 +30,38 @@
/*
* IDT vectors usable for external interrupt sources start
* at 0x20:
+ * hpa said we can start from 0x1f.
+ * 0x1f is documented as reserved. However, the ability for the APIC
+ * to generate vectors starting at 0x10 is documented, as is the
+ * ability for the CPU to receive any vector number as an interrupt.
+ * 0x1f is used for IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR since that vector needs
+ * an entire privilege level (16 vectors) all by itself at a higher
+ * priority than any actual device vector. Thus, by placing it in the
+ * otherwise-unusable 0x10 privilege level, we avoid wasting a full
+ * 16-vector block.
*/
-#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR 0x20
+#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR 0x1f
+#define IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR 0x80
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
# define SYSCALL_VECTOR 0x80
-# define IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR 0x80
-#else
-# define IA32_SYSCALL_VECTOR 0x80
#endif
/*
- * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x20 - 0x2f for triggering
+ * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x10 - 0x1f for triggering
* cleanup after irq migration.
+ * this overlaps with the reserved range for cpu exceptions so this
+ * will need to be changed to 0x20 - 0x2f if the last cpu exception is
+ * ever allocated.
*/
+
#define IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR
/*
- * Vectors 0x30-0x3f are used for ISA interrupts.
+ * Vectors 0x20-0x2f are used for ISA interrupts.
+ * round up to the next 16-vector boundary
*/
-#define IRQ0_VECTOR (FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 0x10)
+#define IRQ0_VECTOR ((FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 16) & ~15)
#define IRQ1_VECTOR (IRQ0_VECTOR + 1)
#define IRQ2_VECTOR (IRQ0_VECTOR + 2)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-01-05 0:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-25 8:42 [PATCH] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2009-12-28 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-29 5:08 ` [PATCH -v2] " Yinghai Lu
2009-12-30 12:21 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Increase " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 3:06 ` [PATCH -v2] x86: increase " Jesse Brandeburg
2010-01-04 3:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 6:56 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:18 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 18:40 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:04 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:14 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:01 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:35 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:45 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-04 19:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 0:05 ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-05 0:16 ` Yinghai Lu [this message]
2010-01-05 5:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Reclaim IDT vectors 0x20-0x2f tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:48 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:14 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 20:33 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 21:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 22:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:32 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:38 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:42 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05 5:30 ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Don't waste a vector to improve vector spread tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:08 ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 6:58 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: get more exact nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:03 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:16 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:47 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:50 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B4284C6.9030107@kernel.org \
--to=yinghai@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.