All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	NetDEV list <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 13:33:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B425EB5.5080504@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B425BB7.90501@kernel.org>

On 01/04/2010 01:20 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h
> @@ -30,8 +30,17 @@
>  /*
>   * IDT vectors usable for external interrupt sources start
>   * at 0x20:
> + * hpa said we can start from 0x1f.
> + *   0x1f is documented as reserved.  However, the ability for the APIC
> + *   to generate vectors starting at 0x10 is documented, as is the
> + *   ability for the CPU to receive any vector number as an interrupt.
> + *   0x1f is used for IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR since that vector needs
> + *   an entire privilege level (16 vectors) all by itself at a higher
> + *   priority than any actual device vector.  Thus, by placing it in the
> + *   otherwise-unusable 0x10 privilege level, we avoid wasting a full
> + *   16-vector block.
>   */
> -#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR		0x20
> +#define FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR		0x1f
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
>  # define SYSCALL_VECTOR			0x80
> @@ -41,15 +50,19 @@
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> - * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x20 - 0x2f for triggering
> + * Reserve the lowest usable priority level 0x10 - 0x1f for triggering
>   * cleanup after irq migration.
> + * this overlaps with the reserved range for cpu exceptions so this
> + * will need to be changed to 0x20 - 0x2f if the last cpu exception is
> + * ever allocated.
>   */
> +
>  #define IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR		FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR
>  
>  /*
> - * Vectors 0x30-0x3f are used for ISA interrupts.
> + * Vectors 0x20-0x2f are used for ISA interrupts.
>   */
> -#define IRQ0_VECTOR			(FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 0x10)
> +#define IRQ0_VECTOR			(FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 1)
>  
>  #define IRQ1_VECTOR			(IRQ0_VECTOR +  1)
>  #define IRQ2_VECTOR			(IRQ0_VECTOR +  2)
> @@ -68,6 +81,13 @@
>  #define IRQ15_VECTOR			(IRQ0_VECTOR + 15)
>  

I'm not sure that making IRQ_MOVE_CLEANUP_VECTOR and IRQ0_VECTOR offsets
from FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR makes sense from a readability perspective.
These are now magic numbers, and making them offsets is only confusing,
as it implies we could do it differently.

If nothing else, the actual logic for IRQ0_VECTOR should be:

#define IRQ0_VECTOR		((FIRST_EXTERNAL_VECTOR + 16) & ~15)

... since that is what we actually want -- we round up to the next
16-vector boundary.  Both +16 and +1 misrepresent the logic.

>  /*
> + * First APIC vector available to drivers: (vectors 0x30-0xee) we
> + * start at 0x31 to spread out vectors evenly between priority
> + * levels. (0x80 is the syscall vector)
> + */
> +#define FIRST_DEVICE_VECTOR		(IRQ15_VECTOR + 2)
> +

We really should fix that so we can do +1 here instead of +2; that
presumably means fixing the logic so we do something smarter than just
jump over 0x80.

	-hpa

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-04 21:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-12-25  8:42 [PATCH] x86: increase NR_IRQS and nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2009-12-28  9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-12-29  5:08   ` [PATCH -v2] " Yinghai Lu
2009-12-30 12:21     ` [tip:x86/apic] x86: Increase " tip-bot for Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04  3:06     ` [PATCH -v2] x86: increase " Jesse Brandeburg
2010-01-04  3:20       ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04  6:56         ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:18           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 18:40             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:04               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:14                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:01             ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:09               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:35                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:45                   ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-04 19:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05  0:05                       ` Suresh Siddha
2010-01-05  0:16                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-05  5:30                           ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Reclaim IDT vectors 0x20-0x2f tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:48                   ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:06                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:14                       ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 20:33                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:10                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 21:20                             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 21:33                               ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2010-01-04 22:01                                 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:03                                   ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:32                                     ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:38                                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 23:42                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:49                                         ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 23:59                                           ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-05  5:30                                   ` [tip:x86/apic] x86, apic: Don't waste a vector to improve vector spread tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 20:08                   ` Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04  6:58         ` [PATCH 2/2] x86: get more exact nr_irqs Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 16:55           ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:03             ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 19:16               ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 19:30                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04 19:47                   ` Yinghai Lu
2010-01-04 20:05                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2010-01-04 21:50                     ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-01-04  6:59         ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: get back 15 vectors Yinghai Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B425EB5.5080504@zytor.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@gmail.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.