From: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>,
mtosatti@redhat.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp
Subject: [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:52:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B728FF9.6010707@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
dirty-bitmap-traveling is carried out by byte size in qemu-kvm.c.
But We think that dirty-bitmap-traveling by long size is faster than by byte
size especially when most of memory is not dirty.
Signed-off-by: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
bswap.h | 1 -
qemu-kvm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bswap.h b/bswap.h
index 4558704..d896f01 100644
--- a/bswap.h
+++ b/bswap.h
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static inline void cpu_to_be32wu(uint32_t *p, uint32_t v)
#define cpu_to_32wu cpu_to_le32wu
#endif
-#undef le_bswap
#undef be_bswap
#undef le_bswaps
#undef be_bswaps
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index a305907..ea07912 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -2438,27 +2438,29 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(unsigned long start_addr,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long mem_size)
{
- unsigned int i, j, n = 0;
- unsigned char c;
- unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1;
+ unsigned int i, j;
+ unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1, c;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
- unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + 7) / 8;
+ unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) /
+ HOST_LONG_BITS;
+ unsigned long *bitmap_ul = (unsigned long *)bitmap;
/*
* bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
* especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- c = bitmap[i];
- while (c > 0) {
- j = ffsl(c) - 1;
- c &= ~(1u << j);
- page_number = i * 8 + j;
- addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
- addr = offset + addr1;
- ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
- cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
- n++;
+ if (bitmap_ul[i] != 0) {
+ c = le_bswap(bitmap_ul[i], HOST_LONG_BITS);
+ while (c > 0) {
+ j = ffsl(c) - 1;
+ c &= ~(1ul << j);
+ page_number = i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j;
+ addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ addr = offset + addr1;
+ ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
+ cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
+ }
}
}
return 0;
--
1.6.3.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Cc: ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com,
Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 19:52:41 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B728FF9.6010707@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
dirty-bitmap-traveling is carried out by byte size in qemu-kvm.c.
But We think that dirty-bitmap-traveling by long size is faster than by byte
size especially when most of memory is not dirty.
Signed-off-by: OHMURA Kei <ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
---
bswap.h | 1 -
qemu-kvm.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bswap.h b/bswap.h
index 4558704..d896f01 100644
--- a/bswap.h
+++ b/bswap.h
@@ -209,7 +209,6 @@ static inline void cpu_to_be32wu(uint32_t *p, uint32_t v)
#define cpu_to_32wu cpu_to_le32wu
#endif
-#undef le_bswap
#undef be_bswap
#undef le_bswaps
#undef be_bswaps
diff --git a/qemu-kvm.c b/qemu-kvm.c
index a305907..ea07912 100644
--- a/qemu-kvm.c
+++ b/qemu-kvm.c
@@ -2438,27 +2438,29 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_pages_log_range(unsigned long start_addr,
unsigned long offset,
unsigned long mem_size)
{
- unsigned int i, j, n = 0;
- unsigned char c;
- unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1;
+ unsigned int i, j;
+ unsigned long page_number, addr, addr1, c;
ram_addr_t ram_addr;
- unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + 7) / 8;
+ unsigned int len = ((mem_size / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) + HOST_LONG_BITS - 1) /
+ HOST_LONG_BITS;
+ unsigned long *bitmap_ul = (unsigned long *)bitmap;
/*
* bitmap-traveling is faster than memory-traveling (for addr...)
* especially when most of the memory is not dirty.
*/
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
- c = bitmap[i];
- while (c > 0) {
- j = ffsl(c) - 1;
- c &= ~(1u << j);
- page_number = i * 8 + j;
- addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
- addr = offset + addr1;
- ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
- cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
- n++;
+ if (bitmap_ul[i] != 0) {
+ c = le_bswap(bitmap_ul[i], HOST_LONG_BITS);
+ while (c > 0) {
+ j = ffsl(c) - 1;
+ c &= ~(1ul << j);
+ page_number = i * HOST_LONG_BITS + j;
+ addr1 = page_number * TARGET_PAGE_SIZE;
+ addr = offset + addr1;
+ ram_addr = cpu_get_physical_page_desc(addr);
+ cpu_physical_memory_set_dirty(ram_addr);
+ }
}
}
return 0;
--
1.6.3.3
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-10 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-10 10:52 OHMURA Kei [this message]
2010-02-10 10:52 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] qemu-kvm: Speed up of the dirty-bitmap-traveling OHMURA Kei
2010-02-10 13:10 ` Ulrich Drepper
2010-02-10 13:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ulrich Drepper
2010-02-10 13:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 13:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 15:54 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 15:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 15:57 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 15:57 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:00 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 16:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 16:43 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:43 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:47 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:47 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:52 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:54 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:54 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-10 16:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 16:43 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-10 15:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-02-10 15:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Anthony Liguori
2010-02-12 2:03 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-12 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " OHMURA Kei
2010-02-14 12:34 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-14 12:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Avi Kivity
2010-02-15 6:12 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-15 6:12 ` [Qemu-devel] " OHMURA Kei
2010-02-15 8:24 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-15 8:24 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 11:16 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-16 11:16 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-16 11:18 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-16 11:18 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17 9:42 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-17 9:42 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-17 9:46 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17 9:46 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 5:57 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-18 5:57 ` OHMURA Kei
2010-02-18 10:30 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-18 10:30 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 9:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-02-17 9:49 ` Alexander Graf
2010-02-17 9:49 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B728FF9.6010707@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--to=ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.