* Re: Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status
[not found] ` <4BD86CC1.7050405-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-04-28 17:25 ` Kevin Constantine
[not found] ` <4BD86FA1.6010108-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Constantine @ 2010-04-28 17:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-nfs
Re-sending to the non-deprecated list...
On 04/28/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Constantine wrote:
> Hey Everyone-
> I was hoping that someone might provide an update on the status of
> Directory Delegations and specifically the Negative Caching pieces that
> are talked about here:
>
> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/CITI_Experience_with_Directory_Delegations
>
>
> Thanks so much
>
> -kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status
[not found] ` <4BD86FA1.6010108-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
@ 2010-04-28 17:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-29 16:39 ` Kevin Constantine
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2010-04-28 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Constantine; +Cc: linux-nfs
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:25:53AM -0700, Kevin Constantine wrote:
> Re-sending to the non-deprecated list...
Hm, the forwarding from it to here doesn't seem to be working.
Anyway, no, as far as I know, nobody is working on directory
delegations.
--b.
>
> On 04/28/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Constantine wrote:
>> Hey Everyone-
>> I was hoping that someone might provide an update on the status of
>> Directory Delegations and specifically the Negative Caching pieces that
>> are talked about here:
>>
>> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/CITI_Experience_with_Directory_Delegations
>>
>>
>> Thanks so much
>>
>> -kevin
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status
2010-04-28 17:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
@ 2010-04-29 16:39 ` Kevin Constantine
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Constantine @ 2010-04-29 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: J. Bruce Fields; +Cc: linux-nfs
On 04/28/2010 10:45 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:25:53AM -0700, Kevin Constantine wrote:
>> Re-sending to the non-deprecated list...
>
> Hm, the forwarding from it to here doesn't seem to be working.
>
> Anyway, no, as far as I know, nobody is working on directory
> delegations.
>
Ahh bummer. That's too bad. Thanks for the update Bruce.
-kevin
> --b.
>
>>
>> On 04/28/2010 10:13 AM, Kevin Constantine wrote:
>>> Hey Everyone-
>>> I was hoping that someone might provide an update on the status of
>>> Directory Delegations and specifically the Negative Caching pieces that
>>> are talked about here:
>>>
>>> http://wiki.linux-nfs.org/wiki/index.php/CITI_Experience_with_Directory_Delegations
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks so much
>>>
>>> -kevin
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-30 17:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <4BD86CC1.7050405@disney.com>
[not found] ` <4BD86CC1.7050405-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-28 17:25 ` Directory Delegations and Negative Caching Status Kevin Constantine
[not found] ` <4BD86FA1.6010108-P5ys19MLBK/QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-28 17:45 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-04-29 16:39 ` Kevin Constantine
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.