From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
a.gruenbacher
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan >
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:01:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C425273.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
The comment for struct shrinker in include/linux/mm.h says
"shrink...It should return the number of objects which remain in the
cache."
Please notice the word "remain".
In fs/mbcache.h, mb_cache_shrink_fn is used as the shrink function:
static struct shrinker mb_cache_shrinker = {
.shrink = mb_cache_shrink_fn,
.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
};
In mb_cache_shrink_fn, the return value for nr_to_scan > 0 is the
number of mb_cache_entry before shrink operation. It may because the
memory usage for mbcache is low, so the effect is not so obvious.
I think we'd better fix the return value issue.
Following patch is against 2.6.35-rc5. Please check it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..412e7cc 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ count = 0;
+ list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
+ struct mb_cache *cache + list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
out:
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.7.1.1
--
Thanks and Regards,
shenghui
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
a.gruenbacher
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:01:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C425273.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
The comment for struct shrinker in include/linux/mm.h says
"shrink...It should return the number of objects which remain in the
cache."
Please notice the word "remain".
In fs/mbcache.h, mb_cache_shrink_fn is used as the shrink function:
static struct shrinker mb_cache_shrinker = {
.shrink = mb_cache_shrink_fn,
.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
};
In mb_cache_shrink_fn, the return value for nr_to_scan > 0 is the
number of mb_cache_entry before shrink operation. It may because the
memory usage for mbcache is low, so the effect is not so obvious.
I think we'd better fix the return value issue.
Following patch is against 2.6.35-rc5. Please check it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..412e7cc 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ count = 0;
+ list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
+ struct mb_cache *cache =
+ list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
out:
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.7.1.1
--
Thanks and Regards,
shenghui
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>,
a.gruenbacher@computer.org
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:01:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C425273.5000702@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi,
The comment for struct shrinker in include/linux/mm.h says
"shrink...It should return the number of objects which remain in the
cache."
Please notice the word "remain".
In fs/mbcache.h, mb_cache_shrink_fn is used as the shrink function:
static struct shrinker mb_cache_shrinker = {
.shrink = mb_cache_shrink_fn,
.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
};
In mb_cache_shrink_fn, the return value for nr_to_scan > 0 is the
number of mb_cache_entry before shrink operation. It may because the
memory usage for mbcache is low, so the effect is not so obvious.
I think we'd better fix the return value issue.
Following patch is against 2.6.35-rc5. Please check it.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..412e7cc 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -228,6 +228,16 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ count = 0;
+ list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
+ struct mb_cache *cache =
+ list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
out:
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.7.1.1
--
Thanks and Regards,
shenghui
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2010-07-18 1:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-18 1:01 Wang Sheng-Hui [this message]
2010-07-18 1:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 1:01 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 4:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 4:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 4:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 6:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-18 6:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-18 6:36 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 6:36 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 6:36 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-19 18:39 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:39 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 1:02 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-20 1:02 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` shenghui
2010-07-20 15:13 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 15:13 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:40 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:40 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 10:53 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 10:53 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 14:00 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-21 14:00 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-21 14:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-19 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mbcache: Remove unused features Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 16:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 16:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 23:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-07-22 0:07 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] mbcache: fix shrinker function return value Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] mbcache fixes Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-22 0:54 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` shenghui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C425273.5000702@gmail.com \
--to=crosslonelyover@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.