From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: sandeen@redhat.com, agruen@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.orgkerne
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan >
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 10:53:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C46D1C5.90200@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4C425273.5000702@gmail.com>
Sorry. regerated the patch, please check it.
I wrapped most code in single pair of spinlock ops for 2 reasons:
1) get spinlock 2 times seems time consuming
2) use single pair of spinlock ops can keep "count"
consistent for the shrink operation. 2 pairs may
get some new ces created by other processes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..ee57aa3 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -201,21 +201,15 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
+ struct mb_cache *cache;
int count = 0;
- spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
- list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
- struct mb_cache *cache - list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
- mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
- atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
- count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
- }
mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
- if (nr_to_scan = 0) {
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ if (nr_to_scan = 0)
goto out;
- }
+
while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
struct mb_cache_entry *ce list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
@@ -223,12 +217,18 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
list_for_each_safe(l, ltmp, &free_list) {
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
out:
+ list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.6.3.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: sandeen@redhat.com, agruen@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, kerne
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:53:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C46D1C5.90200@gmail.com> (raw)
Sorry. regerated the patch, please check it.
I wrapped most code in single pair of spinlock ops for 2 reasons:
1) get spinlock 2 times seems time consuming
2) use single pair of spinlock ops can keep "count"
consistent for the shrink operation. 2 pairs may
get some new ces created by other processes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..ee57aa3 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -201,21 +201,15 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
+ struct mb_cache *cache;
int count = 0;
- spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
- list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
- struct mb_cache *cache =
- list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
- mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
- atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
- count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
- }
mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
- if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ if (nr_to_scan == 0)
goto out;
- }
+
while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
@@ -223,12 +217,18 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
list_for_each_safe(l, ltmp, &free_list) {
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
out:
+ list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.6.3.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: sandeen@redhat.com, agruen@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:53:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C46D1C5.90200@gmail.com> (raw)
Sorry. regerated the patch, please check it.
I wrapped most code in single pair of spinlock ops for 2 reasons:
1) get spinlock 2 times seems time consuming
2) use single pair of spinlock ops can keep "count"
consistent for the shrink operation. 2 pairs may
get some new ces created by other processes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..ee57aa3 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -201,21 +201,15 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
+ struct mb_cache *cache;
int count = 0;
- spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
- list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
- struct mb_cache *cache =
- list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
- mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
- atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
- count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
- }
mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
- if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ if (nr_to_scan == 0)
goto out;
- }
+
while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
@@ -223,12 +217,18 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
list_for_each_safe(l, ltmp, &free_list) {
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
out:
+ list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.6.3.3
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
To: sandeen@redhat.com, agruen@suse.de, hch@infradead.org,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 18:53:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C46D1C5.90200@gmail.com> (raw)
Sorry. regerated the patch, please check it.
I wrapped most code in single pair of spinlock ops for 2 reasons:
1) get spinlock 2 times seems time consuming
2) use single pair of spinlock ops can keep "count"
consistent for the shrink operation. 2 pairs may
get some new ces created by other processes.
Signed-off-by: Wang Sheng-Hui <crosslonelyover@gmail.com>
---
fs/mbcache.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index ec88ff3..ee57aa3 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -201,21 +201,15 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
LIST_HEAD(free_list);
struct list_head *l, *ltmp;
+ struct mb_cache *cache;
int count = 0;
- spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
- list_for_each(l, &mb_cache_list) {
- struct mb_cache *cache =
- list_entry(l, struct mb_cache, c_cache_list);
- mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
- atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
- count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
- }
mb_debug("trying to free %d entries", nr_to_scan);
- if (nr_to_scan == 0) {
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
+ spin_lock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+ if (nr_to_scan == 0)
goto out;
- }
+
while (nr_to_scan-- && !list_empty(&mb_cache_lru_list)) {
struct mb_cache_entry *ce =
list_entry(mb_cache_lru_list.next,
@@ -223,12 +217,18 @@ mb_cache_shrink_fn(int nr_to_scan, gfp_t gfp_mask)
list_move_tail(&ce->e_lru_list, &free_list);
__mb_cache_entry_unhash(ce);
}
- spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
list_for_each_safe(l, ltmp, &free_list) {
__mb_cache_entry_forget(list_entry(l, struct mb_cache_entry,
e_lru_list), gfp_mask);
}
out:
+ list_for_each_entry(cache, &mb_cache_list, c_cache_list) {
+ mb_debug("cache %s (%d)", cache->c_name,
+ atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count));
+ count += atomic_read(&cache->c_entry_count);
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&mb_cache_spinlock);
+
return (count / 100) * sysctl_vfs_cache_pressure;
}
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-07-21 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-18 1:01 [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 1:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 1:01 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 4:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 4:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 4:06 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-18 6:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-18 6:01 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Christoph Hellwig
2010-07-18 6:36 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 6:36 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-18 6:36 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-19 18:39 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:39 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 1:02 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-20 1:02 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-20 1:04 ` shenghui
2010-07-20 15:13 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 15:13 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-20 16:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:40 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 18:40 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui [this message]
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 10:53 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-21 14:00 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Eric Sandeen
2010-07-21 14:00 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Eric Sandeen
2010-07-21 14:00 ` Eric Sandeen
2010-07-19 16:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] mbcache: Remove unused features Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 16:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-19 16:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 23:18 ` Andreas Dilger
2010-07-22 0:07 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] mbcache: fix shrinker function return value Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:44 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 0/2] mbcache fixes Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 17:57 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-21 23:22 ` Al Viro
2010-07-22 0:54 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 0:54 ` Wang Sheng-Hui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` [PATCH] fix return value for mb_cache_shrink_fn when nr_to_scan > 0 shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` shenghui
2010-07-22 1:06 ` shenghui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C46D1C5.90200@gmail.com \
--to=crosslonelyover@gmail.com \
--cc=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.orgkerne \
--cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.