* D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
@ 2010-10-13 9:12 Peter Trenkamp
2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Trenkamp @ 2010-10-13 9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netfilter
Hello everybody,
I was searching in the Internet about how to change the destination
IPv6 address into another IPv6 address. Unfortunately I did not find
anything about this, except the information that ip6tables does not
support this kind of NAT.
So my question is: Is there a workaround for selecting a packet by
Source and/or Destination address and then change the IPv6
destination address into a new one?
Kind regards
Peter Trenkamp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
2010-10-13 9:12 D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6 Peter Trenkamp
@ 2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-13 15:27 ` Grant Taylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Trenkamp; +Cc: netfilter
On Wednesday 2010-10-13 11:12, Peter Trenkamp wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I was searching in the Internet about how to change the destination
> IPv6 address into another IPv6 address. Unfortunately I did not find
> anything about this, except the information that ip6tables does not
> support this kind of NAT.
> So my question is: Is there a workaround for selecting a packet by
> Source and/or Destination address and then change the IPv6
> destination address into a new one?
IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-10-13 15:27 ` Grant Taylor
2010-10-13 15:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2010-10-13 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mail List - Netfilter
On 10/13/10 05:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.
That doesn't negate the desire for it.
Grant. . . .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
2010-10-13 15:27 ` Grant Taylor
@ 2010-10-13 15:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-13 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Taylor; +Cc: Mail List - Netfilter
On Wednesday 2010-10-13 17:27, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 10/13/10 05:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.
>
> That doesn't negate the desire for it.
Buddhistic saying goes, what you desire, and what you get, are two
different worlds.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-13 15:46 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-13 9:12 D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6 Peter Trenkamp
2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-13 15:27 ` Grant Taylor
2010-10-13 15:46 ` Jan Engelhardt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.