D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

* D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
@ 2010-10-13  9:12 Peter Trenkamp
  2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Trenkamp @ 2010-10-13  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netfilter

Hello everybody,

I was searching in the Internet about how to change the destination
IPv6 address into another IPv6 address. Unfortunately I did not find
anything about this, except the information that ip6tables does not
support this kind of NAT.
So my question is: Is there a workaround for selecting a packet by
Source and/or Destination address and then change the IPv6
destination address into a new one?

Kind regards

Peter Trenkamp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
  2010-10-13  9:12 D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6 Peter Trenkamp
@ 2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
  2010-10-13 15:27   ` Grant Taylor
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-13 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Peter Trenkamp; +Cc: netfilter

On Wednesday 2010-10-13 11:12, Peter Trenkamp wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> I was searching in the Internet about how to change the destination
> IPv6 address into another IPv6 address. Unfortunately I did not find
> anything about this, except the information that ip6tables does not
> support this kind of NAT.
> So my question is: Is there a workaround for selecting a packet by
> Source and/or Destination address and then change the IPv6
> destination address into a new one?

IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
  2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
@ 2010-10-13 15:27   ` Grant Taylor
  2010-10-13 15:46     ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant Taylor @ 2010-10-13 15:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mail List - Netfilter

On 10/13/10 05:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.

That doesn't negate the desire for it.



Grant. . . .

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6
  2010-10-13 15:27   ` Grant Taylor
@ 2010-10-13 15:46     ` Jan Engelhardt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Engelhardt @ 2010-10-13 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Grant Taylor; +Cc: Mail List - Netfilter

On Wednesday 2010-10-13 17:27, Grant Taylor wrote:
> On 10/13/10 05:01, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> IPv6 was designed to do without NAT.
>
> That doesn't negate the desire for it.

Buddhistic saying goes, what you desire, and what you get, are two 
different worlds.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-10-13 15:46 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-10-13  9:12 D-NAT and S-NAT in IPv6 Peter Trenkamp
2010-10-13 10:01 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-10-13 15:27   ` Grant Taylor
2010-10-13 15:46     ` Jan Engelhardt

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.