* Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
@ 2010-11-04 8:27 Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-04 11:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Schmidt @ 2010-11-04 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello.
Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
Looking throught it during OEDEM did still show up way to many entries. Some are
still from 2009. Next Saturday and Sunday I would like to reduce our current
count from 273 patches. 100 or less would be a nice goal imho.
Steps to help out:
1) make sure you have a patchwork account and are added to the admin group to
change patches
2) Hang out on IRC on saturday and sunday
3) Go through the patchwork and find all patches from yourself and up date them
with a current status. e.g. mark them as superseeded if you send a new version
or applied if they hit the tree.
4) After your own patches pick other ones and try to find out about their
current staus. Usually git log, the ml or asking people on IRC helps here to
find out stuff about the patch.
If you cleaned up more then 10 patches a day you are allowed to drink a beer in
the evening. ;)
regards
Stefan Schmidt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-04 8:27 Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days Stefan Schmidt
@ 2010-11-04 11:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-04 13:17 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Frans Meulenbroeks @ 2010-11-04 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
2010/11/4 Stefan Schmidt <stefan@datenfreihafen.org>:
> Hello.
>
> Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
> patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
>
> Looking throught it during OEDEM did still show up way to many entries. Some are
> still from 2009. Next Saturday and Sunday I would like to reduce our current
> count from 273 patches. 100 or less would be a nice goal imho.
>
> Steps to help out:
> 1) make sure you have a patchwork account and are added to the admin group to
> change patches
> 2) Hang out on IRC on saturday and sunday
> 3) Go through the patchwork and find all patches from yourself and up date them
> with a current status. e.g. mark them as superseeded if you send a new version
> or applied if they hit the tree.
> 4) After your own patches pick other ones and try to find out about their
> current staus. Usually git log, the ml or asking people on IRC helps here to
> find out stuff about the patch.
>
> If you cleaned up more then 10 patches a day you are allowed to drink a beer in
> the evening. ;)
I would love to help out, but as it stands I'll be travelling on
saturday and won't have internet access on sat and sun (and probably
the rest of the week neither)
(but I'll drink the beer anyway :-) ).
Wish you all the best cleaning up!
Frans
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-04 8:27 Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-04 11:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
@ 2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
` (2 more replies)
1 sibling, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Schmidt @ 2010-11-07 18:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello.
On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
> Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
> patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
>
> Looking throught it during OEDEM did still show up way to many entries. Some are
> still from 2009. Next Saturday and Sunday I would like to reduce our current
> count from 273 patches. 100 or less would be a nice goal imho.
We are no down to a patch count of 186. With the new patches that came in the
last two days that makes 100 patches that are gone. Most of them had already
been applied or superseded by other patches and often were just missing a status
update.
For the outstanding patches I see three big groups which need our attention:
1) Core/class patches: It would be great if some people more familiar with the
core internals of OE could have a look at them and discuss outstanding issues
or apply them.
2) Stable/2009 patches: We still have patches sitting in patchwork for the
stable branch. It would be great if they also could get some attention, not
only patches for master.
3) Outdated patches: We have patches reaching as far back as 2009. This needs
improvement. Besides making sure that patches are getting review in a timely
manner and really get applied when already acked we should think about
patches that do not get and feedback at all.
As a side note the patchwork installation will move to our OSUOSL server. The
new installation will not hold the old patch history we have right now. This
should be taken as motivation to clean up the rest we have in there. :)
I have mixed feeling after this weekend. On the one hand we got rid of quite
some outstanding stuff on the other hand most of the changes have been updates
on the patch status and finding out if they have already been applied. Also only
a handfull people could get motivated to help. For the next incarnation of such
a weekend (I would aim for early december after the first release was tagged) it
would be great if more people could join the fun.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
@ 2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
2010-11-08 8:28 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 14:25 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-08 14:53 ` Koen Kooi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Mueller @ 2010-11-08 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On Sunday 07 November 2010 19:20:29 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
> > patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
>
/patch/2970/ was nak'd / superseded.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
@ 2010-11-08 8:28 ` Stefan Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Schmidt @ 2010-11-08 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello.
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 09:12, Andreas Mueller wrote:
> On Sunday 07 November 2010 19:20:29 Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
> > > patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
> >
> /patch/2970/ was nak'd / superseded.
Thanks I updated it in patchwork. In the future you can do this by yourself by
adding an account and asking Philip/Crofton to add your account to maintainers.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
@ 2010-11-08 14:25 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-09 8:18 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 14:53 ` Koen Kooi
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2010-11-08 14:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On Thu, 2010-11-04 at 09:27, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Its time for some house-keeping again. I know many people are working on
>> patchwork on-going, thanks for that.
>>
>> Looking throught it during OEDEM did still show up way to many entries. Some are
>> still from 2009. Next Saturday and Sunday I would like to reduce our current
>> count from 273 patches. 100 or less would be a nice goal imho.
>
> We are no down to a patch count of 186. With the new patches that came in the
> last two days that makes 100 patches that are gone. Most of them had already
> been applied or superseded by other patches and often were just missing a status
> update.
>
> For the outstanding patches I see three big groups which need our attention:
>
> 1) Core/class patches: It would be great if some people more familiar with the
> core internals of OE could have a look at them and discuss outstanding issues
> or apply them.
>
> 2) Stable/2009 patches: We still have patches sitting in patchwork for the
> stable branch. It would be great if they also could get some attention, not
> only patches for master.
Would it be possible to get a list of patches that the folks (thanks a
lot for doing it, everyone!) who did the cleanup felt fit into these areas?
--
Tom Rini
Mentor Graphics Corporation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
2010-11-08 14:25 ` Tom Rini
@ 2010-11-08 14:53 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-09 1:05 ` Philip Balister
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Koen Kooi @ 2010-11-08 14:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 07-11-10 19:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> As a side note the patchwork installation will move to our OSUOSL server. The
> new installation will not hold the old patch history we have right now. This
> should be taken as motivation to clean up the rest we have in there. :)
When will the OSUOSL instance start logging patches? If the patch
history is lost, will the userdatabase be moved over?
regards,
Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFM2A7ZMkyGM64RGpERAoQeAJ48BWKEmSiUIZH/ejMxOVKdZjzGVwCeI9ut
AnSlbYl5loOijjjPznrYnHQ=
=IW4l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-08 14:53 ` Koen Kooi
@ 2010-11-09 1:05 ` Philip Balister
2010-11-09 8:07 ` Stefan Schmidt
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Philip Balister @ 2010-11-09 1:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
On 11/08/2010 06:53 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07-11-10 19:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
>> As a side note the patchwork installation will move to our OSUOSL server. The
>> new installation will not hold the old patch history we have right now. This
>> should be taken as motivation to clean up the rest we have in there. :)
>
> When will the OSUOSL instance start logging patches? If the patch
> history is lost, will the userdatabase be moved over?
The user database has more spam accounts than real users.
Philip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days
2010-11-09 1:05 ` Philip Balister
@ 2010-11-09 8:07 ` Stefan Schmidt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Schmidt @ 2010-11-09 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: openembedded-devel
Hello.
On Mon, 2010-11-08 at 17:05, Philip Balister wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 06:53 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
> >
> >On 07-11-10 19:20, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >
> >>As a side note the patchwork installation will move to our OSUOSL server. The
> >>new installation will not hold the old patch history we have right now. This
> >>should be taken as motivation to clean up the rest we have in there. :)
> >
> >When will the OSUOSL instance start logging patches? If the patch
> >history is lost, will the userdatabase be moved over?
>
> The user database has more spam accounts than real users.
Do we know when the new installation should happen?
regards
Stefan Schmidt
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-11-09 8:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-11-04 8:27 Patchwork cleanup weekend in two days Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-04 11:33 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-04 13:17 ` Frans Meulenbroeks
2010-11-07 18:20 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 8:12 ` Andreas Mueller
2010-11-08 8:28 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 14:25 ` Tom Rini
2010-11-09 8:18 ` Stefan Schmidt
2010-11-08 14:53 ` Koen Kooi
2010-11-09 1:05 ` Philip Balister
2010-11-09 8:07 ` Stefan Schmidt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.